Neurocognitive Dysfunction and Criminal Liability: Integrating Neuroscience, Legal Theory, and Islamic Thought
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/ciils.v3i1.31833Keywords:
Neuroethics, Criminal Law, Neuroscience Evidence, Moral Responsibility, Islamic JusticeAbstract
This article examines the relationship between neurocognitive dysfunction, criminal behaviour, legal theory, and Islamic thought, with particular attention to the neurobiological foundations of moral decision-making and criminal responsibility. Employing an interdisciplinary normative approach that integrates cognitive neuroscience, criminal law theory, moral philosophy, and Islamic jurisprudence, this study analyses how neurobiological dysfunctions especially those affecting the prefrontal cortex and amygdala may influence impulse control, moral judgement, and antisocial conduct. Drawing exclusively on a critical review of scholarly literature, judicial decisions, and normative legal sources, the article explores the implications of neuroscientific findings for concepts of free will, moral agency, and criminal liability. The analysis demonstrates that while neuroscientific evidence has the potential to inform sentencing mitigation and rehabilitative strategies, its application raises significant ethical and legal challenges, particularly concerning biological determinism, evidentiary reliability, and procedural fairness. From an Islamic legal perspective, sound intellect (‘aql) constitutes the foundation of taklīf (legal responsibility), yet Islamic jurisprudence recognises circumstances in which responsibility may be diminished or removed, in accordance with the principles of raf‘ al-ḥaraj and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. The article argues that the absence of clear procedural standards and limited doctrinal integration of neuroscience within criminal justice systems particularly in Indonesia and Malaysia necessitates a more coherent normative framework. Ultimately, this study proposes a holistic and ethically grounded approach to criminal justice reform that integrates neuroscientific insights with legal principles and religious values, aiming to enhance proportionality, procedural justice, and human dignity.
References
Abi Dawud, Sulayman ibn al-Ashʿath. Sunan Abi Dawud. Vol. 3. Cairo: Dar Hijr, 1999.
Al-Nawawi, Abu Zakariya Yahya ibn Sharaf. Al-Minhāj Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Vol. 7. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1392 AH.
Al-Qurtubi, Abu ʿAbd Allah Muhammad ibn Ahmad. Al-Jāmiʿ li Aḥkām al-Qurʾān. Vol. 6. Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah.
Al-Syārikh, M., and A. M. Hariz. “Mafhūm al-Iʿāqāt al-ʿAqliyyah wa Atharuhu fī al-Taklīf al-Sharʿī.” Journal of the Islamic University of Sharia and Legal Studies 27, no. 3 (2019): 165–83.
Al-Zuhayli, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuh. 2nd ed. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1985.
Alimardani, Armin. “An Empirical Study of the Use of Neuroscience in Sentencing in New South Wales, Australia.” Frontiers in Psychology 14 (August 2023): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1228354.
Alimardani, Armin, and Jason Chin. “Neurolaw in Australia: The Use of Neuroscience in Australian Criminal Proceedings.” Neuroethics 12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-09395-z.
Anderson, Nathaniel E., and Kent A. Kiehl. “Re-Wiring Guilt: How Advancing Neuroscience Encourages Strategic Interventions Over Retributive Justice.” Frontiers in Psychology (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00390.
Anselmo, Anna, Chiara Lucifora, Patrice Rusconi, Gabriella Martino, Giuseppe Craparo, Mohammad A. Salehinejad, and Carmelo M. Vicario. “Can We Rewire the Criminal Mind via Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation of Prefrontal Cortex? Insights from Clinical, Forensic and Social Cognition Studies.” Current Psychology (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03210-y.
Auguste, Evan, Molly Bowdring, Steven W. Kasparek, Jeanne McPhee, Alexandra R. Tabachnick, Irene Tung, and Chardée A. Galán. “Psychology’s Contributions to Anti-Blackness in the United States Within Psychological Research, Criminal Justice, and Mental Health.” Perspectives on Psychological Science (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221141374.
Aulia, M. Zulfa. “Hukum Progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum (2018). https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.1.159-185.
Aziz, Nurfaizatul Aisyah Ab, Muzaimi Mustapha, and Sabarisah Hashim. “Reflections on Neuroethical Issues in Neuroimaging Research from the Islamic Perspective.” International Journal of Islamic Thought 25 (2024). https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.25.2024.291.
Berryessa, Colleen M. “Judicial Stereotyping Associated with Genetic Essentialist Biases toward Mental Disorders and Potential Negative Effects on Sentencing.” Law and Society Review (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12382.
Borbón, Diego. “Neurosociology and Penal Neuroabolitionism: Rethinking Justice with Neuroscience.” Frontiers in Sociology (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.814338.
Cholidin, Achmad, Zico Junius Fernando, and Mikhael Feka. “Utilization of Neuroimaging in Criminal Justice: Unveiling Truth Through Brain Technology.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies 9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v9i2.50316.
Choy, Olivia, Farah Focquaert, and Adrian Raine. “Benign Biological Interventions to Reduce Offending.” Neuroethics (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-9360-0.
Coppola, Frederica. “Mapping the Brain to Predict Antisocial Behaviour: New Frontiers in Neurocriminology, ‘New’ Challenges for Criminal Justice.” UCL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence (2022). https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.2052-1871.008.
Darmawati, Rafika Nur, and Harun Abadu. “The Idea of Legal Reform Implementation Assessment Risks and Criminogenic Needs of Residivist Inmates in Overcoming Residivism.” IJLR: International Journal of Law Reconstruction 8, no. 2 (2024): 1–23.
Das, Jayatri, Cynthia Forlini, Darrell M. Porcello, Karen S. Rommelfanger, and Arleen Salles. “Neuroscience Is Ready for Neuroethics Engagement.” Frontiers in Communication 7 (December 2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.909964.
Denno, Deborah W. “Neuroscience and the Personalization of Criminal Law Symposium: Personalized Law.” University of Chicago Law Review 86 (2019): 359–402.
Febriana, Putri, and Nina Zulida Situmorang. “Mengapa Remaja Agresi?” Jurnal Psikologi Terapan dan Pendidikan 1, no. 1 (2019): 16. https://doi.org/10.26555/jptp.v1i1.15128.
Fernando, Zico Junius, Agusalim, Ria Anggraeni Utami, Hamonangan Albariansyah, and Rian Sacipto. “Neurolaw: A Concept in Development and Enforcement of Criminal Law in Indonesia.” Jambura Law Review 7, no. 1 (2025): 55–87. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v7i1.24144.
Feuerbach, Lea, and Anna-Maria Getoš Kalac. “On (Measuring) Recidivism, Penal Populism and the Future of Recidivism Research.” Godišnjak Akademije Pravnih Znanosti Hrvatske (2023). https://doi.org/10.32984/gapzh.14.1.1.
Focquaert, Farah. “Neurobiology and Crime: A Neuro-Ethical Perspective.” Journal of Criminal Justice (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.01.001.
Gaudet, Lyn M., and Gary E. Marchant. “Under the Radar: Neuroimaging Evidence in the Criminal Courtroom.” Drake Law Review (2016).
Hadiputra, A., M. A. Maskur, R. Arifin, I. Amrullah, and H. Maajid. “Juvenile Justice in Comparative Perspective: A Study of Indonesian State Law and Islamic Law.” Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society 3, no. 2 (2024): 203–228. https://doi.org/10.15294/ciils.v3i2.79011.
Ibn Ashur, Muhammad ibn Tahir. Al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Vol. 4. Tunis: al-Dār al-Tūnisiyyah li al-Nashr, 1984.
Indraswara, Dede, Cahya Wulandari, Muhammad Azil Maskur, and Aisyah Nur Rafidah. “The Legal Politics of Regulating Special Terrorism Crimes under Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Terrorism Studies 4, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.15294/ijctns.v4i1.3480.
Kolla, Nathan J., and Marco Bortolato. “The Role of Monoamine Oxidase A in the Neurobiology of Aggressive, Antisocial, and Violent Behavior: A Tale of Mice and Men.” Progress in Neurobiology 194, no. 1 (November 2020): 101875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101875.
Kusrin, Zuliza Mohd, Wan Nur A’ina Mardhiah Wan Rushdan, and Mohd Al Adib Samuri. “Standard Operating Procedure for Arrest and Detention of Autists by Royal Malaysia Police.” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (2021). https://doi.org/10.47836/PJSST.29.1.10.
Lansdell, Gaye T., Bernadette J. Saunders, and Anna Eriksson. Neurodisability and the Criminal Justice System: Comparative and Therapeutic Responses. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789907636.
Lara, Francisco. “Neurorehabilitation of Offenders, Consent and Consequentialist Ethics.” Neuroethics (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-022-09510-1.
Mahaiyadin, Mohd Hapiz, Norsyifa Harun, Roshaimizam Suhaimi, and Zakiah Samori. “Islamic Legal Perspective on Hemp Cultivation in Malaysia: Wonder or Evil?” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences (2022). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i12/14810.
Marzbani, Hengameh, Hamid Reza Marateb, and Marjan Mansourian. “Methodological Note: Neurofeedback: A Comprehensive Review on System Design, Methodology and Clinical Applications.” Basic and Clinical Neuroscience (2016). https://doi.org/10.15412/j.bcn.03070208.
Md Tah, Ikmal Hisham, and Khairil Azmin Mokhtar. “Malaysia’s Ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” International Journal of Business, Economics and Law (2016).
Newsome, Jamie, and Francis T. Cullen. “The Risk-Need-Responsivity Model Revisited: Using Biosocial Criminology to Enhance Offender Rehabilitation.” Criminal Justice and Behavior (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817715289.
Njatrijani, Rinitami. “Law, Development & Justice Review.” Law, Development & Justice Review 3, no. 2 (2022): 1–9.
Paladin, A. V. “Ethics and Neurology in the Islamic World.” Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences 19 (1998): 255–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02427614.
Puspaningrum, F. D., C. T. Adhi, and A. S. D. Satrio. “A Comparative Study of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia and America: Religious and Legal Aspects.” Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society 2, no. 1 (2023): 1–30.
Putra, T. I., A. J. Islam, and A. M. A. Rahman. “Integrating Islamic Laws into Indonesian Data Protection Laws: An Analysis of Regulatory Landscape and Ethical Considerations.” Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society 3, no. 1 (2024): 85–118.
Rahmadania, Anisyah, and Hery Noer Aly. “Implementasi Teori Hierarchy of Needs Maslow dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar di Yayasan Cahaya Generasi Islam Kota Bengkulu.” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK) 5, no. 4 (2023): 261–72. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v5i4.17456.
Saputro, M. E., A. Febriansyah, and F. D. Putri. “A Discourse of Capital Punishment in Islamic Law and Human Rights Law.” Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society 2, no. 1 (2023): 35–70.
Sitasari, Novendawati Wahyu. “Mengenal Analisa Konten dan Analisa Tematik dalam Penelitian Kualitatif.” Forum Ilmiah 19 (2022): 77.
Soma, Kiran K., Melissa Ann L. Scotti, Amy E. M. Newman, Thierry D. Charlier, and Gregory E. Demas. “Novel Mechanisms for Neuroendocrine Regulation of Aggression.” Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 29, no. 4 (2008): 476–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2007.12.003.
Sulayman ibn al-Ashʿath, Abi Dawud. Sunan Abi Dawud. Vol. 3. Cairo: Dar Hijr, 1999.
Sunawari, Ahmad Luqmanulhakim, Azira Khalil, Madihah Mat Idris, and Azlina Mokhtar. “A Patient-Centered Hospital in Malaysia in Accordance with Maqasid Syariah Principles: A Comprehensive Review and Prospective Research Directions.” International Journal of Islamic Thought (2023). https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.24.2023.266.
Valentini, Laura. “Dignity and Human Rights: A Reconceptualisation.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqx011.
Waller, Bruce N. Against Moral Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262016599.001.0001.
Wenzel, Amy. “Basic Strategies of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy.” Psychiatric Clinics of North America (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2017.07.001.
Wishart, Hannah, and Colleen M. Berryessa. Neurolaw in the Courtroom: Comparative Perspectives on Vulnerable Defendants. London: Routledge, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003331056
Downloads
Published
Article ID
31833Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rafika Nur, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar, Azwad Rachmat Hambali , Ridwanto Igirisa, Ahmad Fakhrurrazi Mohammed Zabidi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the author and do not represent the views of this journal and the author’s affiliated institutions.
