The Digital Sanctuary: Forging Legal And Ethical Frameworks For Interfaith Coexistence Online

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/ciils.v4i2.35309

Keywords:

Digital Sanctuary, Interfaith Coexistence, Online Hate Speech, Internet Governance

Abstract

The internet has profoundly transformed interfaith relations, offering an unprecedented global arena for dialogue and community building. Yet this transformative power is shadowed by a growing threat: the digital space is increasingly weaponized as a battleground for religious tensions, fueled by hate speech, misinformation, and targeted harassment. The absence of robust legal and ethical frameworks tailored to the complexities of online interaction leaves interfaith communities vulnerable and undermines genuine cooperation. This article introduces the conceptual model of a “digital sanctuary”—a deliberately designed and protected online space where diverse faiths can coexist and flourish. Achieving this ideal is not an organic outcome of technology but requires intentional, multi-faceted efforts from all stakeholders. The paper critically examines regulatory gaps and ethical dilemmas obstructing interfaith harmony online, highlighting the limitations of fragmented national laws in a borderless environment and analyzing the responsibilities of technology platforms. We advocate moving beyond simple content moderation toward a proactive, rights-based approach that prioritizes the safety and dignity of religious minorities. By proposing a model of “digital jurisprudence,” the article calls for holistic guidelines that extend beyond traditional statutes. These include policy recommendations for algorithmic transparency, community-led dialogue, and greater international cooperation to establish standards that balance freedom of expression with protection from religious incitement. Ultimately, the paper contends that the future of peaceful interfaith coexistence depends on transforming the digital realm from a passive, ungoverned space into a resilient ecosystem where principles of mutual respect are systematically protected and nurtured

References

Altomonte, John Charles A. “Future Politics: Living Together in a World Transformed by Tech.” The Social Science Journal 60, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.2014213.

Balkin, Jack M. “The First Amendment in the Second Gilded Age.” Buffalo Law Review 66, no. 5 (2018).

Bejan, Felicia. “CYBERSECURITY AND CYBERCRIME: CHALLENGES OF AN INVISIBLE SPACE.” Perspectives of Law and Public Administration 11, no. 1 (2022).

Campbell, Heidi A. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203084861.

Castells, Manuel. “75. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age.” In Democracy, 2017. https://doi.org/10.7312/blau17412-091.

Chew, Sing C., Roland Robertson, and William R. Garrett. “Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture.” Contemporary Sociology 22, no. 6 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2307/2075975.

Cooper, Richard N., and Anthony Giddens. “The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 78, no. 2 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/20049222.

Fernández Pedemonte, Damián. “Turkle, Sherry. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other?” Austral Comunicación 1, no. 2 (2012). https://doi.org/10.26422/aucom.2012.0102.fer.

Giddens, Anthony. “Runaway World: How Globalization Is Reshaping Our Lives.” In Rugman Reviews, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-28787-8_45.

Hindman, Douglas B. “The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier.” Journal of Applied Communications 80, no. 1 (1996). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1358.

Kanellis, Grigoris. “Freedom of Speech vs. Hate Speech in European Law: A Balancing Act.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5165261.

Laine, Matias. “Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do?” Social and Environmental Accountability Journal 32, no. 1 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160x.2012.656425.

Lessig, Lawrence. Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace. ReadHowYouWant. com, 2009.

Masyhar, Ali, Ali Murtadho, Rohadhatul Aisy, and Roziya Abu. “Economic Assistance as a Form of Non-Penal Policy in Countering Terrorism for Ex-Prisoners in Indonesia.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 5, no. 2 (2024): 681–704.

Mosley, Layna, and Thomas L. Friedman. “The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century.” International Journal 61, no. 3 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2307/40204208.

Noble, Safiya Umoja. “Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism.” In Algorithms of Oppression. New York university press, 2018.

Nye Jr, Joseph S. “Cyber Power,” 2010.

Pasculli, L, and Lorenzo Pasculli. “The Global Causes of Cybercrime and State Responsibilities: Towards an Integrated Interdisciplinary Theory.” Journal of Ethics and Legal Technologies (JELT) 2, no. 1 (2020).

Payne, Brian K., and Lora Hadzhidimova. “Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Trends in Cybercrime Research: An Examination.” International Journal of Cyber Criminology 14, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.3106a17b.

Ramada, Diandra Preludio, and Indah Sri Utari. “Unveiling the Surge in Corruption: A Menacing Threat to Indonesia’s Stability in Anti-Corruption Law Reform.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 5, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.vol5i1.2092.

Stark, David, and Manuel Castells. “The Rise of the Network Society.” Contemporary Sociology 26, no. 6 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/2654643.

Sumadinata, Widya Setiabudi. “Cybercrime and Global Security Threats: A Challenge in International Law.” Russian Law Journal 11, no. 3 (2023): 438–44.

Tapscott, Don, and Anthony D Williams. Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. Penguin, 2008.

Taylor, Steve John. “The Complexity of Authenticity in Religious Innovation:‘Alternative Worship’ and Its Appropriation as ‘Fresh Expressions.’” M/C Journal 18, no. 1 (2015).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Article ID

35309

How to Cite

“The Digital Sanctuary: Forging Legal And Ethical Frameworks For Interfaith Coexistence Online”. 2025. Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society 4 (2): 183-206. https://doi.org/10.15294/ciils.v4i2.35309.