Small Claim Court as the Alternative of Bad Credit Settlement for Legal Certainty of the Economic Actors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v3i2.23077Keywords:
court; default; small claim courtAbstract
This article aimed to analyze the problem of legal cases accumulation, especially default on credit contracts in court. It also analyzes the effectiveness of implementing a small claim court in contract default and the independence of a single judge in handling cases through the small claim court mechanism. Small claim court also to offer a breakthrough in the settlement of bad loans related to contract defaults to reduce the burden on courts in Indonesia and provide legal certainty to business actors. The sole judge also examine, resolve and decide on inheritance cases in a fast and efficient process to issue a fair decision for all parties. This normative study was carried out using statutory, case, comparative law, and analysis content approaches. The research results showed that the filing of small claim court increased 10 times from 2015 to 2020, with the plaintiffs dominated by banks in bad credit cases. A small claim court provides benefits the bank and the customer because it speeds up the settlement of the plaintiff's money in a bad credit case with a case value of not more than 500 million, especially for microloans in a maximum period of 25 days. Furthermore, the latest regulation of 2019 concerning small claim court gives judges the authority to confiscate guarantees and conduct auctions to carry out forced executions through the Court Execution Auction process.
References
Ariani, N. V. (2018). Gugatan Sederhana dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 18(3), 381-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.381-396.
Arifin, R. (2020). Crimes and Society, How Do the Law Respond to Disruptive Conditions?. Law Research Review Quarterly, 6(1), i-iv. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/snh/article/view/37437.
Arifin, R. (2020). Legal Reform Discourse in Indonesia and Global Context: How Does The Law Respond to Crime. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 1(2), 193-196. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v1i2.37057.
Asrun, A. M. (2004). Krisis Peradilan: Mahkamah Agung di Bawah Suharto. Jakarta: ELSAM.
Court. (2021). Case Tracking Information System. Central Jakarta.
Darmawati, D., & Zainuddin, A. (2015). Penerapan Keputusan Verstek di Pengadilan Agama. Al-Mizan, 11(1), 90-101. https://doi.org/10.30603/am.v11i1.997
Harahap, M. Y. (2009). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hartini, S., Widihastuti, S., & Nurhayati, I. (2017). Eksekusi Putusan Hakim dalam Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Sleman. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 14(2), 128-138. https://doi.org/10.21831/civics.v14i2.16852
Ismiyanto, I. (2018). Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah Melalui Gugatan Sederhana Berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (Perma) No. 2 Tahun 2015 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana. Spektrum Hukum, 15(2), 236-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.35973/sh.v15i2.1119
LeIP. (2019). “Supreme Court Case Data Statistics.” Retrieved January 10, 2020 (https://leip.or.id/Statistik-Data-Perkara-Mahkamah-Agung/).
Mertokusumo, S. (2006). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia 6th ed. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Noor, T. (2019). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Hutang Piutang Melalui Akta Perdamaian (Studi Putusan Nomor: 1/Pdt.G.S/2017/PN.Blg). Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Masyarakat, 18(3), 101-113. https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v18i3.1206
Permatasari, L. A. D. (2019). Prosedur dan Pelaksanaan Kartu Kredit Nasabah Bank BRI Cabang Waru Sidoarjo. Thesis. Surabaya: STIE Perbanas Surabaya.
Pratiwi, D. A. (2016). Penyelesaian Hukum oleh Bank Terhadap Nasabah Kartu Kredit yang Wanprestasi (Studi di Kota Malang). Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum, 1-21. http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/2032
Risdianto, R. (2020). Kajian Pelaksanaan Perma Nomor 4 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Atas Perma Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana. Thesis. Tegal: Universitas Pancasakti Tegal.
Saputri, L. R., Kahar, K., & Sulaeman, S. (2019). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Kasus Kredit Macet Pada Bank Rakyat Indonesia Cabang Majene Nomor: 35/Pdt. GS/2018/PN. Mjn. Jurnal Hukum Unsulbar, 2(1), 16-31. https://doi.org/10.31605/j-law.v2i1.589
Setiono, G. C. (2018). Jaminan Kebendaan Dalam Proses Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan (Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Jaminan Benda Bergerak Tidak Berwujud). Transparansi Hukum, 1(1), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.30737/transph.v1i1.159
Supreme Court. (2016). Statictics.
Supreme Court. (2020). Statistics.
Susatyo, R. (2011). Aspek Hukum Kredit Bermasalah di PT. Bank International Indonesia Cabang Surabaya. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7(13), 11-20. http://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/dih/article/view/253
Tampi, R. B. (2018). Kebebasan Bank dalam Memilih Lembaga Penyelesaian Kredit Macet di Indonesia. Lex Privatum, 6(1), 142-150. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/19446
Tejomurti, K. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum yang Berkeadilan Terhadap Aparatur Pemerintah Pada Kasus Pengadaang Barang dan Jasa. Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi, 8(2), 42-52. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v8i2.722
Tjoneng, A. (2017). Gugatan Sederhana Sebagai Terobosan Mahkamah Agung dalam Menyelesaikan Penumpukan Perkara di Pengadilan dan Permasalahannya. Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Dan Investasi, 8(2), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v8i2.726
Tracy, K., & Caron, M. (2017). How the Language Style of Small-Claims Court Judges Does Ideological Work. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 36(3), 321-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X16652191
Weller, S., Ruhnka, J. C., & Martin, J. A. (1990). American Small Claim Courts. Oxford: Ckndompres.
Yunanto, Y. (2019). Menerjemahkan Keadilan dalam Putusan Hakim. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 7(2), 192-205. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.7.2.192-205
Downloads
Published
Article ID
23077Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyrights of the published materials under an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions.
