Digital Rights Advocacy and Victim Protection in Cybercrime Law Enforcement in Indonesia

Aryo  Fadlian; HS  Tisnanta; Maya  Shafira; Ade Maman  Suherman; Faiqah Nur  Azizah

doi:10.15294/ijals.v8i2.63821

Authors

Aryo Fadlian Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7322-5256
HS Tisnanta Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8310-4478
Maya Shafira Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0949-6036
Ade Maman Suherman Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, Indonesia, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6888-8972
Faiqah Nur Azizah Institute of Law RUDN University, Russia, Russian Federation Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2691-6079

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v8i2.63821

Keywords:

Digital Rights, Cybercrime Victims , Freedom of Expression, Legal Advocacy, Rights-Balancing Structural Advocacy

Abstract

The need to protect victims of cybercrime and the need to preserve freedom of expression are two legal interests that must be balanced in Indonesia's digital criminal justice system. The present study examines how Indonesian law deals with this balance and proposes a rights-based advocacy framework. To do this, this study employs normative legal research to analyze the ITE Law, the Criminal Code, and the Personal Data Protection Law, alongside the decisions of the Constitutional Court and relevant human rights standards, Statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches are applied based on the principles of legality, victim protection, necessity, and proportionality. The analysis shows two normative shortcomings: the mechanisms of criminal law do not consistently take account of victim recovery, and the legal distinction between harmful digital behavior and protected public-interest expression is not sufficiently clear. On the basis of this normative analysis, the study establishes the Rights-Balancing Structural Advocacy (RBSA) Model. The innovation of this model is that it combines victim-centered protection with safeguards against over-criminalization in a single structural advocacy mechanism comprising four stages: rights-based screening, proportionality assessment, dual-track advocacy and structural correction. Unlike case-by-case advocacy, RBSA links victim protection and recovery with limits on excessive criminal intervention and with the correction of persistent regulatory and institutional inconsistencies. Its conceptual contribution is thus a normative-operational framework that shifts digital-rights advocacy from being a response to individual cases to becoming a mechanism for protecting rights and promoting structural reform within Indonesia's digital criminal justice governance.

References

’t Hoff-de Goede, M S van, S van de Weijer, and R Leukfeldt. “Explaining Cybercrime Victimization Using a Longitudinal Population-Based Survey Experiment. Are Personal Characteristics, Online Routine Activities, and Actual Self-Protective Online Behavior Related to Future Cybercrime Victimization?” Journal of Crime and Justice 47, no. 4 (August 7, 2024): 472–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2023.2222719.

Addo, M K. “Are Judges beyond Criticism under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.” International & Comparative Law Quarterly 47, no. 2 (1998): 425–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589300061923.

Alexy, Robert. “Balancing, Constitutional Review, and Representation.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 3, no. 4 (October 1, 2005): 572–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moi040.

———. “Constitutional Rights, Proportionality, and Argumentation BT - Proportionality, Balancing, and Rights : Robert Alexy’s Theory of Constitutional Rights.” edited by Jan-R. Sieckmann, 1–10. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77321-2_1.

Ardiansyah, Indra, Anis Widyawati, I S Utari, and M Fadhil. “Taking Restitution Seriously? Victim-Oriented Gaps in the Criminal Justice System.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies 10, no. 1 (2025): 1–44.

Bechtold, Eliza. “Regulating Online Harms: An Examination of Recent Developments in the UK and the US through a Free Speech Lens.” Journal of Media Law 16, no. 2 (2024): 358–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2024.2395094.

Begishev, I, D Kirpichnikov, E Latypova, E Nechaeva, and S Tasakov. “Criminal Legal Support for Safeguarding the Citizens’ Digital Rights.” SHS Web of Conferences 93 (2021): 2023. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219302023.

Casino, Fran, Claudia Pina, Pablo López-Aguilar, Edgar Batista, Agusti Solanas, and Constantinos Patsakis. “SoK: Cross-Border Criminal Investigations and Digital Evidence.” Journal of Cybersecurity 8, no. 1 (January 1, 2022): tyac014. https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac014.

Clough, Jonathan. Principles of Cybercrime. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139540803.

“Cyber Harassment Against Women Journalists in Indonesia: A Feminist Legal Perspective.” The Indonesian Journal of Feminist Legal Studies 1, no. 1 SE-Articles (n.d.): 103–22. https://inleads.id/publications/index.php/IJFLS/article/view/4.

“Digital Surveillance, State Power, and Civil Liberties in Contemporary Indonesia.” The Indonesian Journal of Critical Legal Studies 1, no. 1 SE-Articles (n.d.): 57–88. https://inleads.id/publications/index.php/IJCLS/article/view/19.

Dror-Shpoliansky, Dafna, and Yuval Shany. “It’s the End of the (Offline) World as We Know It: From Human Rights to Digital Human Rights—A Proposed Typology.” European Journal of International Law 32, no. 4 (2021): 1249–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chab087.

Efriliandis, Rio. “Criminal Law Enforcement towards Journalists Who Spread False News.” Ius Poenale 2, no. 1 (2021): 53–62. https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v2i1.2159.

Eide, Elisabeth. “Chilling Effects on Free Expression: Surveillance, Threats and Harassment.” In Making Transparency Possible: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue, 227–42, 2019.

Flora, Henny Saida, Tiromsi Sitanggang, Berlian Simarmata, and Ica Karina. “Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Melindungi Hak Korban Tindak Pidana Cyber: Manifestasi Dan Implementasi.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 8, no. 2 SE-Articles (n.d.): 169–84. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v8i2.6365.

“From Hate Speech to Social Exclusion: Rethinking Legal Protection for Religious Minorities in Indonesia’s Digital Public Sphere.” Indonesian Minority Justice Review 3, no. 2 SE-Articles (n.d.): 89–104. https://doi.org/10.65815/pacv9b83.

Goodwin, Laura, and Vivek Maru. “What Do We Know about Legal Empowerment? Mapping the Evidence.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 9 (2017): 157–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-016-0047-5.

Grover, Rohan. “The Geopolitics of Digital Rights Activism: Evaluating Civil Society’s Role in the Promises of Multistakeholder Internet Governance.” Telecommunications Policy 46, no. 10 (2022): 102437. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102437.

Handayani, Emi Puasa, Zainal Arifin, and Zico Junius Fernando. “Criminal Penalties in Cyberspace: Between the Development of Digital Democracy and Authoritarianism.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies 10, no. 1 (2025): 45–82.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 1, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6842 § (2023).

———. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2008 Nomor 58, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4843 § (2008).

Indonesia, Amnesty International. “Refleksi HUT Ke-80 RI: Kemerdekaan? 903 Orang Dijerat UU ITE Dan Makar Sejak 2018,” n.d. https://doi.org/2025.

Indonesia, Constitutional Court of the Republic of. Decision No. 105/PUU-XXII/2024 (n.d.).

Indriasari, Devi Tri, and Karman. “Freedom of Expression in Regulatory Pressure: Case Study on the Electronic Information and Transaction Law.” Jurnal The Messenger 15, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v15i1.5787.

Irrynta, Dwilani, and Nanik Prasetyoningsih. “An Analysis of Freedom of Speech: Whether the Indonesian Electronic Information and Transactions Law Is Contradictory.” SASI 29, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i2.1061.

Jaishankar, K. “Cyber Victimology: A New Sub-Discipline of the Twenty-First Century Victimology.” In An International Perspective on Contemporary Developments in Victimology, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41622-5_1.

Jeßberger, Florian, and Leonie Steinl. “Strategic Litigation in International Criminal Justice: Facilitating a View from Within.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 20, no. 2 (May 1, 2022): 379–401. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqac008.

Junius Fernando, Zico, Pujiyono, Umi Rozah, and Nur Rochaeti. “The Freedom of Expression in Indonesia.” Cogent Social Sciences 8, no. 1 (December 31, 2022): 2103944. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2103944.

Kalliris, Konstantinos. “Online Harm, Free Speech, and the ‘Legal but Harmful’ Debate: An Interest-Based Approach.” Journal of Media Law 16, no. 2 (2024): 390–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2024.2425547.

Kremling, Janine, and Amanda M Sharp Parker. Cyberspace, Cybersecurity, and Cybercrime. SAGE Publications, 2017.

“Legalizing Defamation or Protecting Free Speech? The Indonesian Court’s Rulings on Digital Libel in the Age of Social Media.” Indonesian Court and Justice Review 2, no. 2 SE-Articles (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.65815/asda9739.

Leukfeldt, Eric Rutger, and Majid Yar. “Applying Routine Activity Theory to Cybercrime: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” Deviant Behavior 37, no. 3 (March 3, 2016): 263–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2015.1012409.

Makarim, Edmon, Muhammad Ibrahim Brata, and Nabilla Arsyafira. “Limitation of Rights as a Manifestation of Duties and Responsibilities Pertaining to the Freedom Expression in Digital Communications.” Indonesia Law Review 9, no. 3 (2019): Article 5. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v9n3.586.

Manitra, Ramalina Ranaivo Mikea, Adya Paramita Prabandari, Abubakar Muhammad Jibril, and Arafat Hossain. “A Proposal for Decriminilisation of Online Defamation in Indonesia: Towards a Human Rights-Based Approach.” Cogent Social Sciences 12, no. 1 (December 31, 2026): 2613959. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2613959.

Mones, Enys, Piotr Sapieżyński, Sune Thordal, Henrik Palmer Olsen, and Sune Lehmann. “Emergence of Network Effects and Predictability in the Judicial System.” Scientific Reports 11, no. 1 (2021): 2740. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82430-x.

Nations, United. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 999 U.N.T.S. 171 § (1966).

———. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, General Assembly Resolution 217 A (III) § (1948).

O’Connell, Michael. “A Comparison of Crime Victims’ Rights Laws in Six Countries: For Victims Is It ‘Same, Same But Different’?” Journal of Victimology and Victim Justice 9, no. 1 (April 1, 2026): 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/25166069261416575.

Otu, Smart E, Babatunde M Idowu, Gilbert Ordu, Benedictta Okezie, and Gilbert Aro. “Revisiting Packer’s Models: Examining Nigeria’s Criminal Justice System in the COVID-19 and Post-COVID-19 Era.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 77 (2024): 100663. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100663.

Pangaribuan, Aristo. “Victim Protection in Indonesia: Rhetoric, Reality, and the Functionalisation Thesis.” International Review of Victimology, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580261441319.

Pas, Kris van der. “Conceptualising Strategic Litigation.” Oñati Socio-Legal Series 11, no. 6(S) SE-Individual Articles (December 22, 2021): S116–45. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1226.

Penagos, E V. “The Digital Prior Restraint: Applying Human Rights Safeguards to Upload Filters in the EU.” Computer Law & Security Review 59 (2025): 106219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106219.

Prahassacitta, Vidya, and Harkristuti Harkrisnowo. “Criminal Disinformation in Relation to the Freedom of Expression in Indonesia: A Critical Study.” Comparative Law Review 27 (2021): 135–65.

Raharjo, Agus, Rahadi Wasi Bintoro, and Nurani Ajeng Tri Utami. “The Legal Policy of Criminal Justice Bureaucracy Cybercrime.” Bestuur 10, no. 2 (2022): 105–22.

Rahayu, Rahayu, Kholis Roisah, Khansadhia Afifah Wardana, and Vania Lutfi Safira Erlangga. “Human Rights Defenders in Indonesia’s Digital Age: Navigating Limited Spaces in the Quest for Digital Democracy.” Sriwijaya Law Review, 2024, 358–75.

“Religious Freedom in the Digital Era: Online Religious Expression, Hate Speech, and Theological Justice in Indonesia.” Indonesian Theological Justice Review 3, no. 3 SE-Articles (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.65815/8q5bep11.

Roberts, Tony. “Understanding Digital Rights: Definitions, Conceptions, and Myths.” Institute of Development Studies, 2025.

Rustam, Xursanov. “Theoretical and Legal Analysis of Digital Law.” Eurasian Journal of Academic Research 2, no. 13 (2022): 651–57. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7460703.

Selmini, Rossella, and Anna Di Ronco. “The Criminalization of Dissent and Protest.” Crime and Justice 52, no. 1 (2023): 197–231. https://doi.org/10.1086/727553.

Shahrullah, Rina Shahriyani, Jihyun Park, and Irwansyah Irwansyah. “Examining Personal Data Protection Law of Indonesia and South Korea: The Privacy Rights Fulfilment.” Hasanuddin Law Review 10, no. 1 (2024): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v10i1.5016.

Simandjuntak, Marcella Elwina, Petrus Soerjowinoto, Emilia Metta Karunia Wijaya, and Hana Mumtazah. “A Snapshot of Violence and Criminalization Against Journalists in Indonesia: Enhancing the Safety of Journalists.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies 9, no. 1 (2024): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v9i1.36416.

Stevens, Marion. “The Value of Advocacy in Promoting Social Change: Implementing the New Domestic Violence Act in South Africa.” Reproductive Health Matters 8, no. 16 (2000): 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(00)90187-3.

Swardhana, G M, S P M Purwani, and D Kelly. “Protection of Victims of Cybercrime in the Era of Industrial Technology 4.0.” Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicacoes 17, no. 2 (2025): 263–80.

Talukdar, J S. “Transnational Crime: A Growing Threat to National and International Security.” SSRN, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6187400.

Tama, Rifqi Anugrah, Mohamad Ikrom, Edward Dixon, Ngaboawaji Daniel Nte, and Siti Hafsyah Idris. “The Role of Legal Empowerment Based Advocacy for Rural Communities on Structural Social Inequality.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 5, no. 2 (2023): 161–80. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v5i2.29864.