Freedom of Speech: Democracy or a Threat to the Country?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/imrev.v5i1.36595Keywords:
Freedom of speech, Democracy, ITE Law, Human rights, Pancasila, Digital literacyAbstract
Freedom of speech is a fundamental human right protected by Indonesia’s Constitution and is an essential component of democratic life. However, its implementation faces serious challenges due to ambiguous laws, such as the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), and the low level of political and digital literacy among citizens. This study employs a descriptive qualitative method using literature review to examine how freedom of speech is practiced in Indonesia and the factors that hinder it within the Pancasila democratic framework. The findings reveal that freedom of speech remains caught between the protection of individual rights and the pursuit of state stability. Misinterpretations of criticism as threats, coupled with repressive legal actions, have limited public expression. In the digital era, social media provides space for public participation but also raises issues of misinformation and hate speech. Therefore, reforms in regulation, improved digital literacy, and stronger civic education are necessary to align freedom of expression with Pancasila values—ensuring that it is exercised ethically, responsibly, and constructively for the advancement of Indonesian democracy.
Downloads
References
Agustina, Anis Defri, Habib Andre Wijaya, Fachri Attalah, Rudi Santoso, and Fakultas Syariah. “Rekonstruksi Politik Untuk Menganalisis Polarisasi Dan Gangguan Demokrasi Di Media Sosial Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan 4, no. 2 (2026): 7–16. https://jurnal.unusultra.ac.id/index.php/jisdik/article/view/847/274.
Ayon Diniyanto, Iqbal Kamalludin. “Menyelamatkan Korban Dari Jerat UU ITE: Studi Kasus Baiq Nuril Maknun Dan Relevansinya Bagi Penguatan Peran Pemerintah Melindungi Pelapor Tindak Asusila.” Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 10, no. 1 (2021): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v10i1.2341.
Bambang, Ihsan, Nadhratun Najwa, and Muhammad Risky Rahmadani. “Kebebasan Berbicara Di Media Sosial : Antara Regulasi Dan Ekspresi.” Student Research Journal 3, no. 1 (2025): 87–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55606/srj-yappi.v3i1.1692.
Budiardjo, Miriam. Dasar Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Penerbit PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2007.
Chakim, M. Lutfi. “Freedom of Speech and the Role of Constitutional Courts: The Cases of Indonesia and South Korea.” Indonesia Law Review 10, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v10n2.605.
Ersa Kusuma, Septya Wahyu, Tutik Yuniani, Firza Zaenatin, Putra Gilang, Aris Prio Agus Santoso. “Kebebasan Berpendapat Dan Kaitannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia ( HAM ).” Sanskara Hukum Dan HAM 01, no. 03 (2023): 97–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58812/shh.v1i03.63.
Fajrin, M. “Penyimpangan Hukum Kasus Prita Mulyasari.” Jurnal Mahasiswa S2 Untan, 2014. https://www.neliti.com/publications/10596/penyimpangan-hukum-kasus-prita-mulyasari.
Faturahman, Andi Adam. “Rilis Indeks HAM 2025, SETARA Institute: Hak Kebebasan Berekspresi Jadi Indikator Paling Rendah.” Tempo, December 10, 2025. https://www.tempo.co/politik/rilis-indeks-ham-2025-setara-institute-hak-kebebasan-berekspresi-jadi-indikator-paling-rendah-2097665.
Fery Auzatas Sa’di, Salahudin, Muhammad Firdaus. “Tinjauan Terhadap Demokrasi Dalam Konteks Masyarakat: Literatur Riview Sistematis.” Jurnal Demokrasi Dan Politik Lokal 6, no. 1 (2024): 13–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25077/jdpl.6.1.13-28.2024.
Indonesia, CNN. “Buntut Kritik Lampung, TikToker Bima Berhadapan Dengan Hukum.” CNN Indonesia, April 16, 2023. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20230416090734-12-938339/buntut-kritik-lampung-tiktoker-bima-berhadapan-dengan-hukum.
Kumar, Shailesh. “Democratising The Fourth Pillar,” n.d. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3618592.
Masferrer, Aniceto. “The Decline of Freedom of Expression and Social Vulnerability in Western Democracy.” Int J Semiot Law 36 (2023): 1443–1475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-09990-1.
Putri Limilia, Ikhsan Fuady. “Literasi Media, Chilling Effect , Dan Partisipasi Politik Remaja.” Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi 9, no. 1 (2021): 40–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v9i1.31939.
Rabith Madah Khulaili Harsya, Filep Wamafma, Marius Supriyanto Sakmaf, Andri, and Triyantoro. “Regulasi Konten Online Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Hak Kebebasan Berbicara Di Platform Digital Di Indonesia.” Sanskara Hukum Dan HAM 3, no. 01 (2024): 43–52. https://doi.org/10.58812/shh.v3.i01.
Sarwono, Jonathan. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Kualitiatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2006.
Wardhani, Untung Sumarwan & Lita Tyesta Addy Listya. “Perwujudan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Dalam Kebebasan Pers Pasca Reformasi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 5 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i3.484-509.
Wiranata, Moh.Khamim, Imam Asmarudin. “Kebebasan Berekspresi Melalui Media Digital Dan Penerapannya Di Indonesia.” Pancasakti Law Journal 1, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24905/plj.v1i2.21.
Wiratraman, Herlambang P. “Indonesia’s Press Freedom And Law at Twenty-Five: Achievements, Legal Changes And Continuing Challenges.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 13, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429326943-51.10.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
36595Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bojezziera Emmet Syaiba Arrasheen Arrasheen, Maula Inayah , Ahmad Dzaki Bagus Andrian, Alya Dwiana Aufani, Prof. Dr. Dewi Sulistianingsih, S.H., M.H. (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the license of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
