Can Reforming Dismissal Procedures in State Administrative Courts Enhance Transparency and Accountability?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v7i1.18862Keywords:
Dismissal Procedures, State Administrative Courts, Transparency, Accountability, Judicial ReformAbstract
The effectiveness of Indonesia’s State Administrative Courts is increasingly under scrutiny, particularly regarding the dismissal procedures that often lack transparency and accountability. This research explores the urgent need for reform in these procedures to foster greater public trust in the judicial system. In a country where citizens’ rights and access to justice are vital to democratic governance, the lack of clarity and fairness in dismissal decisions can undermine confidence in the court’s integrity. The novelty of this study lies in its focus on dismissal procedures as a critical yet often overlooked area of judicial reform. By examining current practices, legal frameworks, and case law, the research identifies key weaknesses in the system, proposing innovative reforms aimed at enhancing procedural transparency, consistency, and accountability. A comparative analysis with international best practices highlights practical solutions that could be adopted to improve the fairness and efficiency of dismissal processes. This research makes a significant contribution by offering a targeted framework for reform that prioritizes the protection of citizens’ rights, ensuring that judicial decisions, particularly dismissals, are made with clarity, fairness, and public scrutiny. It calls for systemic change to align administrative justice with democratic principles of openness and accountability.
References
Al Kautsar, I., & Muhammad, D. W. (2022). Sistem Hukum Modern Lawrence M. Friedman: Budaya Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat dari Industrial Ke Digital. Sapientia Et Virtus, 7(2), 84-99.
Arja, S. (2000). Akuntabilitas dan Pengukuran Kinerja Pemerintah. Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Vol 2, Nopember 2000: 138, 150.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2019). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Cet-11 (Grafindo Persada),
Bimasakti, M. A. (2020). Pembaruan Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca-Reformasi Di Era Peradilan Elektronik. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 3(2), 111-126.
Friedman, Lawrence M. (2009) Sistem Hukum Perspektif Ilmu Sosial, terj. M. Khozim (Jakarta: Nusa Media).
Halim, M. A. A., Amni, S. Z., & Maulana, M. (2023). Legal System in the Perspectives of HLA Hart and Lawrence M. Friedman. Peradaban Journal of Law and Society, 2(1), 51-61.
Herlambang, P. H. (2024). Pengantar Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika).
Herlambang, P. H., Muhtada, D., Yudhanti, R., Pratama, N. W., Wiguna, C. A., Santalia, M., ... & Safarin, M. H. A. F. (2024). Peranan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan. Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif, 3.
Kansil, C. S., & Ma’rifa, G. S. (2024). Efektivitas Pemeriksaan Dismissal Proses. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah dan Riset Sosial Humaniora, 4(2), 163-169.
Khair, A., Siswanto, S. E., & Saleh, M. (2016). Penyelesaian Sengketa Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Melalui Upaya Banding Administratif. Jatiswara, 31(3), 416-436.
Pattipawae, D. R. (2014). Fungsi Pemeriksaan Dismissal dalam Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Sasi, 20(1), 37-55.
Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Disfungsional Proses Dismissal Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 41/G/LH/2018/PTUN. PBR.
Prakasa, A. W., & Adlhiyanti, Z. (2022). Esensi Prosedur Dismissal dalam Tahap Pra-Persidangan Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Borneo Law Review, 6(2), 175-186.
Raba, M. (2006). Akuntabilitas konsep dan Implementasi (Vol. 1). UMMPress.
Riri, S. (2023). Eksistensi dalam Mengoptimalisasikan Pelaksanaan Proses Dismissal dan Pemeriksaan Persiapan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara: Prosedur Dismissal, PTUN, Gugatan. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(1), 124-127.
Saputro, R. E. (2012). Tinjauan Yuridis Pelaksanaan Dismissal Prosedur Serta Eksistensinya Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada).
Suyatno, S. S. (2023). Kelemahan Teori Sistem Hukum Menurut Lawrence M. Friedman Dalam Hukum Indonesia. IUS FACTI: Jurnal Berkala FakultasHukum Universitas Bung Karno, 2(1 Juni), 197-205.
Tjandra, W Riawan. (2023). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Filosofi, Teori, dan Praktek. (Sleman, D.I. Yogyakarta: PT Kanisius)
Triwulan, T., & Sh, M. H. (2016). Hukum Tata Usaha Negara dan Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia. Prenada Media.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
18862Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Maulidhiyo Aprarel Ashilsyah, Eko Nuriyatman, Rodiyah Rodiyah, Bayangsari Wedhatami
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All works published in the Indonesian State Law Review are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions.