Empowering Rural Communities through Appropriate Technology: A Case Study of Cattle Farming in West Bandung, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v12i1.24031Keywords:
Appropriate technology, cattle farming, community empowerment, Indonesia, sustainable agriculture, rural development.Abstract
Background - Rural communities, particularly cattle farmers in Indonesia, often face challenges related to low productivity, economic vulnerability, and unsustainable agricultural practices. The integration of appropriate technology is posited as a critical driver for enhancing productivity and fostering sustainable livelihoods, yet its concrete impacts and implementation challenges in specific rural contexts like West Bandung require detailed investigation.
Research Urgency - There is a pressing need to identify effective strategies for rural community empowerment that can simultaneously boost economic outcomes and promote sustainable agriculture. While technology is often proposed as a solution, a significant gap exists in understanding its practical application, measurable impacts, and the real-world barriers to its adoption among smallholder cattle farmers in Indonesia.
Research Method - This research employed a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews. Data was collected from cattle farmers in West Bandung Regency, West Java, to quantitatively measure changes in production and income, and qualitatively explore the experiences and challenges of technology adoption.
Research Findings - The implementation of appropriate technology led to significant improvements: a 70% increase in milk production, a 40% increase in meat production, and a 40% rise in farmer income, alongside a 37.5% reduction in labor hours. However, major challenges were identified, including high initial costs, technical operational difficulties, and significant knowledge gaps among farmers.
Research Conclusion - The study concludes that appropriate technology serves as a powerful catalyst for the economic empowerment and sustainable development of rural cattle farmers. For its transformative potential to be fully realized, the identified adoption barriers must be addressed through targeted strategies.
Research Novelty/Contribution - This research provides a novel, empirically grounded demonstration of how context-specific technological interventions, when supported by a robust cooperative system, can create an integrated model for community empowerment. It offers a replicable framework for achieving sustainable agricultural development in similar rural contexts across Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Abdel-Basset, M., Gamal, A., Chakrabortty, R. K., & Ryan, M. (2021). Development of a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for sustainability evaluation of bioenergy production technologies: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125805.
Aritenang, A. F., & Chandramidi, A. N. (2023). The spatial effects of fiscal decentralization on regional convergence: the case of regions in indonesia. GeoJournal, 88(2), 2011-2030.
Balcom, S., Doucet, S., & Dubé, A. (2021). Observation and institutional ethnography: Helping us to see better. Qualitative Health Research, 31(8), 1534-1541.
Bishop, C. P. (2021). Sustainability lessons from appropriate technology. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 49, 50-56.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology, 9(1), 3.
Castro-Arce, K., & Vanclay, F. (2020). Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: An analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 45-54.
Coy, D., Malekpour, S., Saeri, A. K., & Dargaville, R. (2021). Rethinking community empowerment in the energy transformation: A critical review of the definitions, drivers and outcomes. Energy Research & Social Science, 72, 101871.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.
Dunn, P. D. (1979). Appropriate technology: technology with a human face (pp. xi+-220pp).
Eriksson, L. (2014). The understandings of social pedagogy from Northern European perspectives. Journal of Social Work, 14(2), 165-182.
Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World (Vol. 1). Princeton University Press.
Fowler Jr, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage publications.
Hayati, S., Yusuf, M. N., & Andrie, B. M. (2023). Strategi pengembangan agroindustri keripik sukun di kecamatan Baregbeg kabupaten Ciamis. Jurnal Agristan, 5(2), 340-353.
Holmberg, J., & Sandbrook, R. (2019). Sustainable development: What is to be done? In Policies for a Small Planet (pp. 19-38). Routledge.
Hudson, H. (2021). It Matters How You ‘Do’Gender in Peacebuilding: African Approaches and Challenges. Insight on Africa, 13(2), 142-159.
Ibn-Mohammed, T., Mustapha, K. B., Godsell, J., Adamu, Z., Babatunde, K. A., Akintade, D. D., ... & Koh, S. C. L. (2021). A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 164, 105169.
Jamali, D. (2006). Insights into triple bottom line integration from a learning organization perspective. Business Process Management Journal, 12(6), 809-821.
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.
Kaplinsky, R. (1990). The economies of small: appropriate technology in a changing world. Intermediate Technology Publications.
Kollalpitiya, K. M. P. M. B., Premaratne, S., & Peiris, B. L. (2012). Reproductive and productive performance of up-country exotic dairy cattle breeds of Sri Lanka.
Kuosa, T. (2016). The evolution of strategic foresight: Navigating public policy making. Routledge.
Kylili, A., Thabit, Q., Nassour, A., & Fokaides, P. A. (2021). Adoption of a holistic framework for innovative sustainable renewable energy development: A case study. Energy sources, Part A: Recovery, utilization, and environmental effects, 1-21.
Manza, J. (2023). Sociology for Beginners. Annual Review of Sociology, 49, 241-261.
Mathur, M., Mehta, R., & Swami, S. (2020). Developing a marketing framework for the bottom of the pyramid consumers. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 17(3), 455-471.
Mishra, M. K. (2020). Sustainable Development: Linking economy and environment in the era of globalization.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research, 42, 533-544.
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge.
Patton, M. Q. (2010). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. Guilford press.
Ray, C., & Jain, R. (Eds.). (2011). Drinking water treatment: focusing on appropriate technology and sustainability. Springer Science & Business Media.
Resnik, D. B. (2015). What is ethics in research & why is it important.
Romero-Castro, N., Miramontes-Viña, V., & López-Cabarcos, M. Á. (2022). Understanding the antecedents of entrepreneurship and renewable energies to promote the development of community renewable energy in rural areas. Sustainability, 14(3), 1234.
Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360-371.
Samaranayake, D. I. J. (2015). Small is Beautiful–A Study of Economics as if People Mattered.
Scherr, S. J. (2000). A downward spiral? Research evidence on the relationship between poverty and natural resource degradation. Food policy, 25(4), 479-498.
Shajahan, K., Sahati, W. Z., & Radović, M. M. (2022). Women empowerment through agricultural technology: case study of Mymensingh-Bangladesh. International Review, (3-4), 57-66.
Speer, P. W., & Hughey, J. (1995). Community organizing: An ecological route to empowerment and power. American journal of community psychology, 23(5), 729-748.
Talitha, T., Firman, T., & Hudalah, D. (2020). Welcoming two decades of decentralization in Indonesia: a regional development perspective. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(5), 690-708.
Wadsworth, Y. (2016). Building in research and evaluation: Human inquiry for living systems. Routledge.
Wei, H., Xu, W., Kang, B., Eisner, R., Muleke, A., Rodriguez, D., ... & Harrison, M. T. (2024). Irrigation with Artificial Intelligence: Problems, Premises, Promises. Human-Centric Intelligent Systems, 1-19.
Willoughby, K. W. (2019). Technology choice: A critique of the appropriate technology movement. Routledge.
Zhong, Y. P., Tang, L. R., & Li, Y. (2022). Role of digital empowerment in developing farmers’ green production by agro-tourism integration in Xichong, Sichuan. Agriculture, 12(11), 1761.
Published
Article ID
24031Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yanti Karmila Nengsih, Elih Sudiapermana, Uyu Wahyudin, Joni Rahmat Pramudia (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.