Developing a Community Education Roadmap for Society 5.0: A Mixed-Methods Study on Digital Literacy and Entrepreneurial Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v12i1.27009Keywords:
community education; digital literacy; entrepreneurial skills; society 5.0.Abstract
Background - The rapid development of technology in the Society 5.0 era demands transformative changes in community education to create a digitally inclusive and sustainable society.
Research Urgency - Existing community education systems still face gaps in preparing individuals to adapt to technological transformation. Therefore, structured strategies are needed to empower communities through digital literacy, entrepreneurial skills, and adaptive competencies.
Research Objectives - This article explores the design and implementation of a roadmap for community education aimed at equipping individuals with digital literacy, entrepreneurial skills, and adaptive competencies.
Research Method - The research employs a mixed-method approach, including surveys, focus group discussions, and case studies, to assess the needs and potential of communities.
Research Findings - The findings highlight the critical role of digital infrastructure, capacity building for educators, and innovative learning models in fostering inclusive and effective education. The roadmap is structured into five phases: assessment, infrastructure development, capacity building, innovative learning implementation, and evaluation. This structured approach addresses existing gaps and provides actionable strategies to empower communities in embracing technological advancements.
Research Conclusion - The results underline the importance of collaboration among stakeholders, including governments, private sectors, and local organizations, in ensuring the roadmap's success.
Research Novelty/Contribution - Ultimately, the roadmap offers a strategic framework to prepare communities for the challenges and opportunities of Society 5.0, contributing to a more equitable and resilient society.
Downloads
References
Alamoudi, E., Mehmood, R., Aljudaibi, W., Albeshri, A., & Hasan, S. H. (2020). Open source and open data licenses in the smart infrastructure era: Review and license selection frameworks. Smart Infrastructure and Applications: Foundations for Smarter Cities and Societies, 537–559.
Ansori, A., Alhadihaq, M. Y., Nuraeni, L., & Estherlita, T. (2024). Community-Based Social Entrepreneurship at Community Learning Centers. Novateur Publications, 39–45.
Ansori, A., Kamil, M., & Hufad, A. (2023). Santri Entrepreneurial Model and its Implementations as Community Empowerment Programs. 9(2), 241–250.
Benade, L. (2019). Flexible learning spaces: Inclusive by design? New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 53–68.
Blossfeld, H.-P., & Von Maurice, J. (2019). Education as a lifelong process. Springer.
Bozhikin, I., Macke, J., & da Costa, L. F. (2019). The role of government and key non-state actors in social entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 730–747.
Broo, D. G., Kaynak, O., & Sait, S. M. (2022). Rethinking engineering education at the age of industry 5.0. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 25, 100311.
Burns, R. (2020). Adult Learner at Work: The challenges of lifelong education in the new millenium. Routledge.
Carayannis, E. G., & Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2022). The futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as driving forces of future universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(4), 3445–3471.
Castro, R. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2523–2546.
Deguchi, A., Hirai, C., Matsuoka, H., Nakano, T., Oshima, K., Tai, M., & Tani, S. (2020). What is society 5.0. Society, 5(0), 1–24.
Donnison, D. (2022). Social policy: the community-based approach. In The Goals of Social Policy (pp. 199–220). Routledge.
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472.
Fukuda, K. (2020). Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0. International Journal of Production Economics, 220, 107460.
Hanna, N. K. (2020). Assessing the digital economy: aims, frameworks, pilots, results, and lessons. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 16.
Holroyd, C. (2022). Technological innovation and building a ‘super smart’society: Japan’s vision of society 5.0. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 15(1), 18–31.
Kickul, J., & Lyons, T. S. (2020). Understanding social entrepreneurship: The relentless pursuit of mission in an ever changing world. Routledge.
Kim, J., & Maloney, E. J. (2020). Learning innovation and the future of higher education. JHU Press.
MacPhail, A., Ulvik, M., Guberman, A., Czerniawski, G., Oolbekkink-Marchand, H., & Bain, Y. (2019). The professional development of higher education-based teacher educators: needs and realities. Professional Development in Education, 45(5), 848–861.
Merriam, S. B., & Baumgartner, L. M. (2020). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide. John Wiley & Sons.
Mielikäinen, M. (2022). Towards blended learning: Stakeholders’ perspectives on a project-based integrated curriculum in ICT engineering education. Industry and Higher Education, 36(1), 74–85.
Mitchell, C., & Sickney, L. (2019). Sustainable improvement: Building learning communities that endure. Brill.
Mourtzis, D., Angelopoulos, J., & Panopoulos, N. (2022). A Literature Review of the Challenges and Opportunities of the Transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0. Energies, 15(17), 6276.
Narvaez Rojas, C., Alomia Peñafiel, G. A., Loaiza Buitrago, D. F., & Tavera Romero, C. A. (2021). Society 5.0: A Japanese concept for a superintelligent society. Sustainability, 13(12), 6567.
Roblek, V., Meško, M., Bach, M. P., Thorpe, O., & Šprajc, P. (2020). The interaction between internet, sustainable development, and emergence of society 5.0. Data, 5(3), 80.
Shatunova, O., Anisimova, T., Sabirova, F., & Kalimullina, O. (2019). STEAM as an innovative educational technology. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(2), 131–144.
Sivarajah, R. T., Curci, N. E., Johnson, E. M., Lam, D. L., Lee, J. T., & Richardson, M. L. (2019). A review of innovative teaching methods. Academic Radiology, 26(1), 101–113.
Smith, C., & Gillespie, M. (2023). Research on professional development and teacher change: Implications for adult basic education. In Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, Volume 7 (pp. 205–244). Routledge.
Statti, A., & Torres, K. M. (2020). Digital literacy: The need for technology integration and its impact on learning and engagement in community school environments. Peabody Journal of Education, 95(1), 90–100.
Suber, P. (2012). Open access. The MIT Press.
Yatimah, D., Ansori, A., Hermawan, Y., Alhadihaq, M. Y., Erlangga, E., Putri, P. K., Lestari, R. D., Suhendi, H. Y., Laksono, B. A., & Novianti, S. (2024). Pemanfaatan Platform Digital Untuk Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Inovatif. Bayfa Cendekia Indonesia.
Zepeda, S. J. (2019). Professional development: What works. Routledge.
Zhang, W., Zhao, S., Wan, X., & Yao, Y. (2021). Study on the effect of digital economy on high-quality economic development in China. PloS One, 16(9), e0257365.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
27009Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ansori Ansori, Tiffany Estherlita, Nandang Rukanda (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.