Development of Digital Learning Media for Community-Based Education: A Collaborative Innovation and Literacy Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v11i2.32060Keywords:
digital, literacy, community-based, adaptive learning, mediaAbstract
Background: The rapid advancement of digital technology has transformed global education, yet disparities in access persist, particularly in low-income and rural regions. Digital literacy—encompassing technical, critical, and ethical competencies—remains underdeveloped due to insufficient teacher training and infrastructural limitations.
Research Objectives: This study aims to (1) assess the effectiveness of FOCIL in improving digital literacy, (2) evaluate its socio-cultural and infrastructural adaptability, and (3) identify key features that enhance learning outcomes in underserved communities.
Research Method: A mixed-methods sequential exploratory design was employed, combining qualitative stakeholder interviews, observational studies, and document analysis, followed by quantitative usability and field trials.
Research Findings: The FOCIL platform significantly enhanced literacy outcomes, with participants demonstrating greater progress than those using conventional methods. Learning modules that incorporated local wisdom, such as regional folktales, proved more engaging and achieved higher completion rates than generic materials. The platform’s low-bandwidth design effectively supported learners in rural areas, enabling continued access through offline mode. Interactive features, particularly discussion forums and gamification, played a central role in boosting engagement and reinforcing learning gains.
Conclusion: FOCIL effectively bridges digital divides by aligning with socio-cultural contexts, overcoming infrastructural barriers, and employing evidence-based pedagogies. Challenges include server latency and the need for teacher training. Future iterations should integrate AI-driven feedback and expand partnerships for scalability.
Novelty/Originality/Value: This study contributes a validated Cultural-Technological Implementation Framework and an open-source, adaptive platform tailored for resource-constrained settings. It advances the discourse on equitable digital education by demonstrating how community-centric design and hybrid learning models can enhance literacy and inclusion.
Downloads
References
Abu-Rasheed, H., Weber, C., & Fathi, M. (2023, July). Context based learning: a survey of contextual indica-tors for personalized and adaptive learning recommendations–a pedagogical and technical perspective. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1210968). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1210968
Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2022). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technol-ogies, 27(1), 189–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). AU Press.
Aryeh-Adjei, A. A. (2025). Enhancing societal impact through University–Community Engagement: Oppor-tunities and challenges at the University of Ghana Learning Centres. Journal of Adult and Continuing Ed-ucation. https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714251352628
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Statistik pendidikan Indonesia 2022 [Report].
Bakia, M., Shear, L., Toyama, Y., & Lasseter, A. (2018). Understanding the implications of online learning for educational productivity. U.S. Department of Education. https://doi.org/10.1037/e696652011-001
Barrun, A., & Cajurao, M. (2025). Contextual teaching and learning in the digital era. International Journal of Innovative Education, 12(1), 88–104.
Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age. Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
Chang, C. C., & Lee, T. H. (2022). Enhancing learning performance through audio-based assessments in mobile learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(6), 1062–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1716024
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associ-ates.
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). Rethinking education in the age of technology. Teachers College Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods ap-proaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Desnita, D., et al. (2022). E-module based on real context to enhance creativity. Journal of Science Learning, 5(3), 567–578.
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed, and what remains uncertain. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5
Firmansyah, F., Tafakur, T., Destiana, B., & Dewi, A. S. (2024). Defining technology-based learning media in science subjects for elementary schools. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 12(2), 242-252. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v12i2.71824
Frau-Meigs, D., et al. (2021). Digital citizenship education handbook. Council of Europe.
Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century. Routledge.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley.
Gyonyoru, A., & Katona, T. (2025). AI-driven adaptive platforms. AI in Education Review, 7(4), 203–219.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2016). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025–3034.
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48.
Hong, S., & Jung, I. (2025). Community-driven learning platforms. Educational Technology Research, 68(1), 77–95.
International Telecommunication Union. (2021). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures. ITU Pub-lications.
Kementerian Pendidikan Indonesia. (2023). Pelatihan guru dalam integrasi teknologi [Policy brief].
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Nielsen, J. (2012). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Nielsen Norman Group.
OECD. (2019). Skills matter: Additional results from the survey of adult skills. OECD Publishing.
Puentedura, R. R. (2014). SAMR: A contextualized introduction. Hippasus.
Strielkowski, W., et al. (2025). AI ethics in adaptive education. Computers & Education, 184, 104521.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills. Jossey-Bass.
Ulhasanah, N., et al. (2025). Participatory knowledge creation in rural Indonesia. Community Development Journal, 60(3), 411–428.
UNESCO. (2018). Digital literacy in education. UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2022). Global education monitoring report: Technology in education.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
Wineburg, S., et al. (2022). Why students can’t detect misinformation. Stanford History Education Group.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
32060Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Daddy Darmawan, Puji Hadiyanti, Setiawan Wibowo, Rahmat Syah, Muhammad Fadhlan Abdillah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.