The Influence of Deep Learning on Dialogic Communication in the Learning Process at Community Learning Centers

Authors

  • Adi Irvansyah Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Karta Sasmita Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Jaenal Mutakim Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Setiawan Wibowo Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Daddy Darmawan Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v12i1.34837

Keywords:

deep learning, dialogic communication, community learning center, non-formal education, lifelong learning

Abstract

Background: The rapid development of 21st-century education requires a paradigm shift from teacher-centered learning toward learner-centered approaches that emphasize deep learning. In the context of non-formal education, Community Learning Centers (Pusat Kegiatan Belajar Masyarakat, PKBM) serve as strategic spaces for lifelong learning. However, many still rely on conventional, one-way instructional practices that limit reflective dialogue and learner engagement. Deep learning, which focuses on critical thinking, collaboration, and knowledge transfer to real-life contexts, has the potential to transform these interactions into more dialogic and meaningful communication processes.

Research Objectives: This study aims to analyze the influence of the deep learning model on enhancing dialogic communication during the learning process at community learning center. Additionally, it seeks to examine the extent to which deep learning contributes to the achievement of UNESCO’s four pillars of learning—learning to know, learning to do, learning to be, and learning to live together.

Research Method: This research employed a mixed-methods design with an explanatory sequential approach. The quantitative phase used a quasi-experimental method involving 120 learners across six community learning center in Jakarta, divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group implemented a deep learning model emphasizing reflective questioning and collaborative dialogue, while the control group applied conventional methods. Quantitative data were analyzed using t-tests and multiple linear regression, while qualitative data were gathered through interviews and observations, then analyzed thematically to provide contextual understanding.

Research Findings: The results showed that learners in the experimental group experienced a significant improvement in dialogic communication compared to the control group (t = 6.42; p = 0.000). Their mean score increased from 61.2 to 84.3, demonstrating enhanced participation, reflection, and critical dialogue. Multiple regression analysis revealed that deep learning was a dominant predictor of achieving the four pillars of learning (β = 0.68; p = 0.000), explaining 53% of the variance in holistic learning outcomes. Qualitative findings supported these results, illustrating that learners perceived the deep learning environment as challenging yet meaningful, fostering curiosity, collaboration, and a sense of empowerment.

Conclusion: The study concludes that deep learning significantly strengthens dialogic communication and holistic learning in non-formal education contexts. By integrating reflection, collaboration, and authentic problem-solving, this approach transforms community learning center classrooms into inclusive and participatory learning spaces. It not only enhances cognitive and social skills but also aligns with the broader mission of community empowerment through lifelong learning.

Novelty/Originality/Value:   This study provides one of the first empirical investigations linking deep learning with dialogic communication in Indonesian non-formal education settings. It offers a practical model for community learning center tutors to foster transformative learning interactions and contributes to policy discussions on enhancing pedagogical capacity in community-based education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barak, M. (2024). Developing teachers' concepts of dialogic pedagogy in real contexts. Teaching and Teach-er Education, 145, 104589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104589

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cui, R. (2021). Classroom dialogue and cognitive achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Re-view, 33, 100387.

Cui, R. (2021). Dialogic education for classroom teaching: A critical review. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(4), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.2021392

Díez-Palomar, J., Flecha, R., & Garcia, R. (2021). Dialogic interventions for literacy promotion in diverse communities. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 20(4), 247–261.

Díez-Palomar, J., Flecha, R., & García-Carrión, R. (2021). How does dialogical talk promote student learning during collaborative group work? Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 31, 100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100571

Fetters, M. D., & Freshwater, D. (2015). Publishing a methodological mixed methods research article. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(3), 203–213.

Fetters, M. D., & Freshwater, D. (2015). The 1 + 1 = 3 integration challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Re-search, 9(2), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815581222

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep learning: Engage the world change the world. Corwin Press.

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep learning: Engage the world change the world. Corwin Press.

Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865

Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561.

Guzmán, V., & Larrain, A. (2024). The transformation of pedagogical practices into dialogic teaching: To-wards a dialogic notion of teacher learning. Professional Development in Education, 50(4), 716–729.

Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260

Kemendikbud. (2021). Laporan tahunan pendidikan nonformal dan informal. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2021). Laporan tahunan pendidikan nonformal dan informal. Ke-mendikbud.

Kovač, T. (2025). Dialogic teaching as a catalyst for deep learning: A theoretical framework. Journal of Edu-cational Psychology, 117(2), 345–362.

Kovač, V. B. (2025). The why, what and how of deep learning: A critical analysis. Educational Research Re-view, 38, 100612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100612

Kuznetsova, H., Panasenko, A., Luchkina, L., Zenchenko, T., & Danylchenko, I. (2023). Dialogic learning as means of forming the communication skills of higher education students. Revista Eduweb, 17(2), 101-115.

Levin, D. S. (2024). Project-based learning and deep learning outcomes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experiential Education, 47(1), 45–63.

Levin, O. (2024). Simulation as a pedagogical model for deep learning. Computers & Education, 215, 105000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105000

Lim, J. S., & Jiang, H. (2024). How perceptions of dialogic communication and authenticity of CSR commu-nication lead to trust and brand loyalty through online brand community engagement intention. Journal of Public Relations Research, 36(3), 233-257.

Lyle, S. (2023). Dialogic teaching and epistemic agency in primary classrooms. Language and Education, 37(3), 287–302.

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.

Mystakidis, S. (2021). Deep learning in immersive environments: A systematic review. Journal of Education-al Computing Research, 59(5), 875–895.

Mystakidis, S. (2021). Deep meaningful learning. Encyclopedia, 1(3), 988–997. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia1030075

Plano Clark, V. L., & Badiee, M. (2010). Research questions in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 275–304). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193

Plano Clark, V. L., & Badiee, M. (2010). Research questions in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 275–304). SAGE Publications.

Putera, H. R. (2022). Education quality improvement of PKBM through community empowerment. In Pro-ceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 1234–1245). IEOM Society International.

Putera, R. P. (2022). Challenges and opportunities of community learning centers in Indonesia. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 41(3), 285–299.

Resnick, L. B. (2017). Toward a Cognitive Theory of Instruction. Dalam S. Paris, G. Olson, & H. Stevenson (Ed.), Learning and Motivation in the Classroom (hal. 5–38). Routledge.

Richards, B. A., Lillicrap, T. P., Beaudoin, P., Bengio, Y., Bogacz, R., Christensen, A., Clopath, C., Costa, R. P., de Berker, A., Ganguli, S., Gillon, C. J., Hafner, D., Kepecs, A., Kriegeskorte, N., Latham, P., Lindsay, G. W., Miller, K. D., Naud, R., Pack, C. C., Poirazi, P., Roelfsema, P., Sacramento, J., Saxe, A., Scellier, B., Schapiro, A. C., Senn, W., Wayne, G., Yamins, D., Zenke, F., Zylberberg, J., Therien, D., & Kording, K. P. (2019). A deep learning framework for neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 22(11), 1761–1770. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0520-2

Ross, K. (2025). Building peace through dialogic teaching: The Civic Conversations teacher professional de-velopment program. Journal of Peace Education, 22(2), 251-277.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral re-search (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report: Technology in education. UNESCO Publishing.

Weng, C., Otanga, S., & Weng, A. (2022). A pedagogical study on promoting students’ deep learning through design-based learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(4), 1054–1076. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211056203

Weng, X., Chiu, T. K. F., & Tsang, C. C. (2022). Promoting deep learning through project-based learning: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(2), 589–615.

Zaid, M., & Hashim, H. (2022). Contextual pedagogy for adult learners: Overcoming barriers in non-formal education. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 455–472.

Published

2026-02-15

Article ID

34837

How to Cite

Irvansyah, A., Sasmita, K., Mutakim, J., Wibowo, S., & Darmawan, D. (2026). The Influence of Deep Learning on Dialogic Communication in the Learning Process at Community Learning Centers. Journal of Nonformal Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v12i1.34837