Optimizing the Empowerment of Mediation Institutions in Banking Dispute Resolution in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v8i2.23699Keywords:
Empowerment, Mediation Institutions, Settlement, Banking DisputesAbstract
The development of the banking business in the digitalization era is increasingly complex, which has the potential to cause disputes with a variety of legal issues. This writing aims to examine and analyze how to empower mediation institutions in resolving business disputes in Indonesia. This writing method is included In the provisions of laws and regulations both in the Civil Code, the Law on Banking, Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Alternative Dispute Resolution and Arbitration, including technical regulations at the Judicial level such as Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 regarding Mediation, it has been regulated regarding the Mediation settlement mechanism. There are various factors that affect mediation institutions that cannot be carried out optimally, namely, banking mediation regulations are inadequate, lack of public understanding (customers), weak banking mediation institutions, weak implementation of mediation. It is necessary to make a social-comprehensive legal breakthrough so that mediation institutions can be empowered more optimally in resolving banking disputes.
References
Aji, Bondan Seno, Made Warka, and Evi Kongres. “Credit Dispute Resolution through Banking Mediation during Covid-19 Pandemic Situation.” Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences 4, no. 2 (2021): 1618–27. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i2.1823.
Anwar, Widya Kurniati. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Melalui Mediasi Di Indonesia1.” Lex Privatum II, no. 2 (2014): 35–43.
Asmaharani Mellinia Harahap, and Adawiyah Nasution. “SETTLEMENT OF CIVIL DISPUTES BETWEEN CUSTOMERS WITH BANK THROUGH BANKING MEDIATION (Case Study of Bank Al Washliyah Medan).” Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 13, no. 1 (2022): 69–74. https://doi.org/10.58471/justi.v13i1.439.
Friedman, Lawrence M. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 1975.
Hakim, Lukmanul, and Oktaria Trivilta. “Prinsip Mengenal Nasabah, Penerapan, Prinsip Kehati-Hatian, Lembaga Perbankan.” Keadilan Progresif 9, no. 2 (2018): 150.
Herliana. “Peran Bank Indonesia Sebagai Pelaksana Mediasi.” Mimbar Hukum 22, no. 1 (2010).
Hermawan, Rudi. “Peran Lembaga Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Syariah.” Et-Tijarie: Jurnal Hukum Dan Bisnis Syariah 5, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21107/ete.v5i1.4595.
Hutomo, Priyo, and Markus Marselinus Soge. “Perspektif Teori Sistem Hukum Dalam Pembaharuan Pengaturan Sistem Pemasyarakatan Militer.” Legacy: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundang-Undangan 1, no. 1 (2021): 46–68. https://doi.org/10.21274/legacy.2021.1.1.46-68.
Indonesia, G. B. Peraturan BI Nomor 10/1/PBI/2008 Tentang Mediasi Perbankan (2008).
Jasa, D. Komisioner and O. Otoritas jasa keuangan republik indonesia (2015).
Julyano, Mario, and Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. “PEMAHAMAN TERHADAP ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM MELALUI KONSTRUKSI PENALARAN POSITIVISME HUKUM.” Jurnal Crepido 01 (2019): 13–22.
L. M. Friedman. The Legal System: A. Social Perseptifve. New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 1975.
Maimun, and Dara Tzahira. “Prinsip Dasar Perbankan Syariah.” Al-Hiwalah: (Sharia Economic Law) 1, no. 1 (2022): 130–33.
Masse, Rahman Ambo, and Muhammad Rusli. “Islamic Banking Dispute Resolution in National Sharia Arbitration Board.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 175, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012169.
Melenko, Oksana. “Mediation As An Alternative Form Of Dispute Resolution: Comparative-Legal Analysis.” European Journal of Law and Public Administration 7, no. 2 (2020): 46–63.
Noya, Ekberth Vallen, and Ade Walakutty. “Hukum Berparadigma Cita Hukum Indonesia Demi Tercapainya Keadilan.” SANISA Jurnal Kretivitas Mahasiswa Hukum 2, no. 2 (2022): 69–80.
Nuryawan, I Dewa Gede Oka. “Rekonstruksi Perjanjian Kerja Bersama Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan.” Jurnal Analisis Hukum 1, no. 2 (2020): 255. https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v1i2.415.
Pahlevi, Farida. “Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia Perspektif Legal System Lawrence M. Freidmen.” El-Dusturie 1, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.21154/eldusturie.v1i1.4097.
Pardede, Marulak, Henry Donald Lbn Toruan, Mosgan Situmorang, and Syprianus Aristeus. “The Settlement of Consumer Disputes by Virtual Mediation Particularly on Banking and Buying Services Online.” Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law and Human Rights 2020 (ICLHR 2020) 549, no. March 2020 (2021): 294–307. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210506.040.
Pikahulan, Rustam Magun. “Implementasi Fungsi Pengaturan Serta Pengawasan Pada Bank Indonesia Dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Terhadap Perbankan.” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan 1, no. 1 (2020): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.1103.
Pujyanti, Luh Putu Vera Astri, and Amelia Kandisa. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Melalui Mediasi Perbankan.” IUS: Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 3, no. 8 (2015): 223–31.
Putri, Endah Arianti, and Giri Suseno. “Peran Mediasi Profitabilitas Pada Pengaruh Solvabilitas Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Di Sektor Perbankan Indonesia.” JSIM: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan 5, no. 1 (2024).
Rashid, Ayesha, and Muhammad Hassan. “Understanding the Role of Ethical Leadership and Workplace Conflicts a Mediation Moderation Model: A Time-Lagged Study.” IRASD Journal of Management 4, no. 2 (2022): 219–40. https://doi.org/10.52131/jom.2022.0402.0075.
Soerjono Soekanto. Faktor Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 1983.
Sudiyana. “Pemberdayaan Peran Lembaga Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Di Indonesia.” PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 4, no. 1 (2017): 122–42. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n1.a7.
Sumrana, M Ibnu, Taufiq Amini, and Muh Reza Zulfikar. “Peran Mediasi Melalui Lembaga Perbankan Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kredit Perbankan: A Literatur Review.” Jurnal Universitas Muslim Indonesia 9, no. 1 (2024): 63–78.
Suran Ningsih, Ayup. “Alternative Dispute Resolution as Soft Approach for Business Dispute in Indonesia.” 2nd International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies (ICILS 2019) 363, no. Icils (2019): 26–33. https://doi.org/10.2991/icils-19.2019.6.
Undang Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2011 Tentang Bantuan Hukum (n.d.).
Vonna, Zakia, Sri Walny Rahayu, and M Nur. “The Mediation Process in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution Through the Religious Court in Indonesia.” IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS 24, no. 9 (2019): 10. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2405053947.
Wahyudi, Slamet Tri. “Problematika Penerapan Pidana Mati Dalam Konteks Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 1, no. 2 (2012): 207. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.2.2012.207-234.
Warasih, Esmi. Pranata Hukum Sebuah Telaah Sosiologi. Semarang: PT Suryadaru Utama, 2010.
Wignjosoebroto, S. Pergeseran Paradigma Dalam Kajian-Kajian Sosial Dan Hukum. Malang: Setara Press, 2013.
Yustianti, Surti. “Kewenangan Pengaturan Dan Pengawasan Perbankan Oleh Bank Indonesia Dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (Ojk).” Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Dan Ke-PPAT-An 1, no. 1 (2017): 60. https://doi.org/10.24198/acta.v1i1.66.
Zubair, Aishat Abdul-Qadir. “An Analysis of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in the Islamic Banking and Finance Industry in Malaysia.” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 11, no. 2 (2020): 164. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v11i2.a16465.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
23699Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sudiyana Sudiyana, Devi Andani (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Journal of Private and Commercial Law adheres to the principles of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) by providing immediate, free, and open access to all published content. All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Under this license, users are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, and adapt the published works in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is included, and any changes made are clearly indicated. The use of the material is strictly limited to non-commercial purposes only.
Authors retain copyright of their work without any restriction. The journal does not transfer copyright from authors; instead, authors grant the journal the right of first publication while maintaining full ownership of their intellectual property. This ensures that authors preserve their rights while enabling wide dissemination and accessibility of their research in accordance with open access principles and DOAJ standards.
