The Urgency Of Regulating Foreign Bribery Crime In Indonesia:Constitutional Legal Framework Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v20i2.17952Keywords:
Foreign Bribery Crime, Constitutional, UrgencyAbstract
The focus of the research is on the urgency of regulating foreign bribery crime in Indonesia as
well as the Indonesian constitution perspective. This issue raises concerns, because the
regulation of foreign bribery crime has not been included in Indonesian Laws, making
Indonesia a country that cannot follow up on this criminal act. The questions that arise are 1)
what the urgency of the regulation of the law on foreign bribery crime in Indonesia is is 2)
what the perspective of the Indonesian constitution regarding foreign bribery crime is is. The
purpose of this study is to describe the urgency of legal regulation of the concept of foreign
bribery crime in Indonesia, and the perspective of the Indonesian constitution regarding
foreign bribery crime. The research method uses juridic-normative research with a qualitative
approach to law. The results of the research show that 1) Indonesia is a participating country
of UNCAC and has ratified it through Law Number 7 of 2006. However, until now there is no
regulation to criminalize foreign bribery. In fact, according to the researcher, this is an urgency
because the opportunity for variation in corruption cases but not followed by criminal reform
of the criminal offense, resulting in the enforcement of corruption crimes is not optimal. 2) The
Indonesian Constitution, by adopting Foreign Bribery in Indonesian legislation, it is hoped that
Indonesia can enforce its laws fairly
References
Amalia, Mia. "Bab V Sumber Hukum Pidana Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional Dalam Pendekatan Sosiokultural." Hukum Pidana 53 (2022).
Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. In Nineteenth-Century Philosophy: Philosophic Classics, Volume IV. New York: Routledge, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19fvzzk.34
Chazawi, Adami. Hukum Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2016.
CNBC Indonesia. “Raja Software Jerman Suap Pejabat RI, Begini Kronologinya.” January 15, 2024. Accessed February 10, 2025. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20240115142129-37-505735/raja-software-jerman-suap-pejabat-ri-begini-kronologinya
Diantha, I Made Pasek. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2016.
Djoni Sumardi Ghozali. Pengantar Perbandingan Sistem Hukum (Civil Law, Common Law, dan Hukum Adat). Jakarta: Universitas Surakarta Press, 2018.
Ebenstein, William, and C. F. Strong. “Modern Political Constitutions.” The Western Political Quarterly 3, no. 2 (1950): 177–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/443510
Engkus, Indah Rizli Afifah, Khairu Syifa Ahyani, Lintang Angesti, and Melania Dwi Lestari. “Gerakan Kerjasama Instrumen Internasional Mencegah Korupsi.” Panengen: Journal of Indigenous Knowledge 1, no. 1 (2022): 9–17. https://jurnal.panengen.com/index.php/ijop/article/view/9/7
Evi Hartanti. Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2023.
Garner, Bryan A. Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th ed. St. Paul, Minnesota: West Group, 1999.
Ginanjar Wahyudi. Kajian Tentang Penyuapan sebagai Salah Satu Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Surakarta: Universitas Surakarta, 2011.
Hamzah, Andi. Korupsi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1991.
Hiariej, E. O. S. “United Nations Convention Against Corruption dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.” Mimbar Hukum 31, no. 1 (2019): 112–125.
Hidayat, R. Kejahatan Lintas Negara di Indonesia. Purbalingga: Eureka Media Aksara, 2022.
Hock, Beate. Extraterritoriality and International Bribery: A Collective Action Perspective. New York: Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429023347
Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2005.
Jahja, H. J. S., and M. SH. Melawan Money Laundering: Mengenal, Mencegah, & Memberantas Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jakarta: Visimedia, 2012.
Joutsen, Matti. “Mutual Legal Assistance.” In Global Crime: An Encyclopedia of Cyber Theft, Weapons Sales, and Other Illegal Activities, Vol. 1–2. New York: Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843145295-17
Kasrudin. "Formulasi Ide Permaafan Hakim (Rechterlijk Pardon) Dalam Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Di Indonesia." (2017). Jurnal Law Reform
Koesnadi Hardjasoemantri. Hukum Tata Lingkungan. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2000.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). Memahami untuk Membasmi. Jakarta: KPK, 2006.
Kristian, and Yopi Gunawan. Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Kajian terhadap Harmonisasi antara Hukum Nasional dan The United Nations Convention Against Corruption. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2015.
Minimum Khusus. QISTIE, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.31942/jqi.v11i2.2595
Muslih, M. “Negara Hukum Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Gustav Radbruch.” Legalitas 4, no. 1 (2013): 15–25.
Nasution, Bahder Johan. Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2008.
Nugroho, D. M. (2018). Dilema Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Pidana
Oduor, J. A., Fernando, F. M. U., Flah, A., Gottwald, D., Hauch, J. M., Mathias, M., Park, J. W., and Stolpe, O. Left Out of the Bargain: Settlements in Foreign Bribery Cases and Implications for Asset Recovery. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1596/9781464800863
Paulson, Stanley L. “Legal Theory.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy, 309–318. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.024
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014.
Pupu Saeful Rahmat. “Penelitian Kualitatif.” Equilibrium 5, no. 9 (2009): 1–8.
Rajesh Babu, R. “The United Nations Convention Against Corruption: A Critical Overview.” SSRN Electronic Journal (2011). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.891898
Rose-Ackerman, Susan, and Pablo Lagunes. Greed, Corruption, and the Modern State: Essays in Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784714703
Satjipto Rahardjo. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.
Sheldon, N. A., Lincoln, Y. S., and Guba, E. G. “Naturalistic Enquiry.” The Statistician 35, no. 3 (1986): 221–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/2987760
Sinaga, Everisco. "Analisis Yuridis Perbuatan Penyuapan Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Nomor: 37/Pid. Sus-Tpk/2017/Pn. Mdn)." (2020).
Sirajuddin Saleh. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Bandung: Pustaka Ramadhan, 2017.
Skandiva, R., and B. Harefa. “Urgensi Penerapan Foreign Bribery dalam Konvensi Antikorupsi di Indonesia.” Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi 7, no. 2 (2021): 245–262.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.
Suryanto, A. F. B. “Penegakan Hukum dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Suap Menyuap dan Gratifikasi di Indonesia.” Dharmasisya: Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI 1, no. 2 (2021): 4–12.
Sustain.id. “Stagnan: Skor 34, Corruption Perception Index (CPI) Indonesia Tahun 2023.” February 5, 2024. Accessed February 10, 2025. https://sustain.id/2024/02/05/stagnan-skor-34-corruption-perception-index-cpi-indonesia-tahun-2023
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2006 tentang Pengesahan United Nations Convention Against Corruption.
United Nations Convention Against Corruption. New York: United Nations, 2004.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
17952Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rodiyah Rodiyah, Asyaffa Ridzqi Amandha , Indah Sri Utari, Anis Widyawati (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) is an open-access license that facilitates the sharing and adaptation of creative works while ensuring proper attribution and preserving the same freedoms for derivative works. This license is designed to be user-friendly and applicable globally, making it a popular choice for a wide range of content, from academic articles to creative arts.
At its core, the Attribution component of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license requires users to give appropriate credit to the original creator of the work. This includes providing a clear citation, linking to the license, and indicating any modifications made. The attribution must be done in a way that does not imply endorsement by the creator of the new use or its creator. This ensures that the original authors are acknowledged for their contributions while allowing their work to be freely used and disseminated.
The ShareAlike aspect of the license mandates that any derivative works or adaptations created from the original must be licensed under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 terms. This means that new works based on the original content must also be freely available and shareable under the same conditions. This provision helps to promote a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement, as it ensures that all adaptations remain accessible to the public and contribute to the collective pool of knowledge and creativity.
