Establishment Of A Voluntary Self Regulation Non-Governmental Consumer Dispute Resolution Organization In Principle Of Fairness And Equality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v20i2.21086Keywords:
Consumer disputes, fairness, LPKSM, voluntary self regulationAbstract
Developments in the economic sector will increase the production and consumption power of society. If consumers suffer losses, economic agents are obliged to be able to provide compensation for the products sold to consumers. The UUPK provides for alternative dispute resolution outside the judicial system, namely through the Non-Governmental Consumer Protection Agency (LPKSM). Settlement of consumer disputes in LPKSM with a voluntary self-regulation mechanism or self-regulation as an effort to regulate, control, evaluate, select and determine a performance that will certainly minimise or reduce the number of disputes that go to the Consumer Disputes Board (BPSK) or the District Court. The research method uses normative legal research by tracing literature studies using a normative legal approach in order to obtain new perceptions of the situation by providing a new form of concept in resolving consumer disputes at LPKSM. The concept of the LPKSM's Voluntary Self-Regulation Mechanism is designed to help various parties, especially business actors and consumers, quickly and inexpensively to resolve disputes at the lowest level before they reach the BPSK or the courts. As a form of voluntary self-regulation, mediation is the right method to implement the principle of equality before the law. The LPKSM acts as a third party, an outsider who is declared to be neutral (impartial) and who helps the parties to come to an agreement. The benefits of resolving consumer disputes are quick, inexpensive and confidential, and can even be described as a win-win solution, set out in a joint peace deed.
References
Amaliah, Nurul. “Financial Services Consumer Protection (Study of the Role of Consumer Organisations in Yogyakarta).” Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia 1, no. 4 (2022): 1191.
Arminawan, Anindya Shamara, Yuhelson Yuhelson, and Erny Kencanawati. “Kepastian Hukum Pembiayaan Musyarakah Pada Perbankan Syariah Terkait Eksistensi Utang Antara Nasabah Dan Bank.” Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge 4, no. 10 (2025): 7775–82.
asp/rvk. “Tok-127-Keputusan-Sengketa-Konsumen-Dianulir-Ma.” https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3669668/tok-127-keputusan-sengketa-konsumen-dianulir-ma, April 2025.
Astuti, Hesti Dwi. “Kendala Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Melalui Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK).” Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia 1, no. 2 (2017): 584–88.
Bachri, Rifkiyati, and Yunan Prasetyo Kurniawan. “Disparitas Pemahaman Hakim Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (Kajian Putusan No. 350 K/Pdt. Sus-BPSK/2016 Dan NO. 10/Pdt. Sus-BPSK/2016/PN. Plk).” Khairun Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2020): 100–108.
Barkatullah, Abdul Halim. Hak-Hak Konsumen. Bandung: Nusamedia, 2010.
Bawono, Bambang Tri, and Henning Glaser. “The Urgency of Restorative Justice Regulation on Hate Speech.” Bestuur 11, no. 2 (2023): 367–68. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v11i2.82508.
Diskhamarzaweny, Diskhamarzaweny, and Zul Ammar. “E-Commerce Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Manajemen Pemasaran Dan Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen.” KODIFIKASI 4, no. 1 (2022): 130.
Djakfar, Muhammad. Business Law: Building a Discourse on the Integration of National Legislation with Shariah. Malang: UIN-Maliki Press, 2016.
Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “Teori Keadilan John Rawls (John Rawls’ Theory of Justice).” Jurnal Konstitusi 6, no. 1 (2009): 140–49.
Febriani, Nur Rahmi, Dhoni Martien, and Yurisa Martanti. “Kepastian Hukum Perubahan Status Perseroan Terbatas Menjadi Perseroan Terbatas Penanaman Modal Asing Akibat Wanprestasi.” Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia 2, no. 10 (2023): 3029.
Gugu, Steven S. “Mencari Kepastian Hukum Dalam Perkawinan Beda Agama Pasca Lahirnya Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2023.” Journal Scientia De Lex 11, no. 2 (2023): 22.
Gunawan, Johanes. “Consumer Protection Law.” Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, Bandung, 1999, 3.
Gunawan, Widjaja, and Ahmad Yani. “Law on Consumer Protection.” Cetakan Keempat, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2008, 93–94.
Hartanto, Hartanto, and Cut Wilda Meutia Syafiina. “The Effectiveness of Consumer Protection Against Cosmetic Products That Do Not Have a Distribution Permit from the DIY Food and Drug Supervisory Centre (In the Perspective of Criminal Law).” Jurnal Meta-Yuridis 4, no. 1 (2021): 58.
Ibrahim, Johny. Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Surabaya: Bayumedia, 2008.
Luhukay, Roni Sulistyanto, and Hartanto Hartanto. “The Urgency of Implementing Local Lockdown to Prevent the Spread of Covid-19 Viewed from the Perspective of the Unitary State.” ADIL Indonesia Journal 2, no. 2 (2020): 42.
Manan, H Abdul, and S Sh. Law Changing Aspects. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2018.
Mukti Fajar, N D, and Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum: Normatif & Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka pelajar, 2010.
Muskibah, Muskibah. “Analisis Mengenai Cara Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen.” INOVATIF| Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 4 (2010): 142–49.
Nasution, A Z. Consumer Protection LawConsumers and the Law: A Socio-Economic Review and Indonesian Consumer Protection Law. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan, 1995.
Nisantika, Riris, and Ni Luh Putu Egi Santika Maharani. “Settlement of Consumer Disputes by the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK).” Jurnal Locus Delicti 2, no. 1 (2021): 49–59.
Nola, Luthvi Febryka. “Advokasi Hukum Oleh LPKSM.” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 5, no. 2 (2016): 193.
Pande, Ni Putu Januaryanti. “Consumer Protection against Imported Cosmetic Products That Are Not Registered at BBPOM Denpasar.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 6, no. 1 (2017): 18.
PP, Tamar Lidya Anggaristi, and Mariske Myeke Tampi. “Legal Protection of Consumers Harmed Due to Fraud by Pt Grab Toko Indonesia Based on Law Number 8 of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection (Case: Desty Nurcahyani with Pt Grab Toko Indonesia in 2020).” Jurnal Hukum Adigama 4, no. 2 (2021): 499.
Rajagukguk, Erman. “Legal Culture and Out-of-Court Civil Dispute Resolution.” Jurnal Magister Hukum 2, no. 4 (2000): 7.
Salam, Acep Fahmi Abdullah. “The Role of LPKSM Al-Jabbar in Resolving Fiduciary Security Disputes in Sumedang Regency.” ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan 12, no. 2 (2018): 109.
Sari, Ayu Permata, and Aminah Suradi. “Legal Protection for Subscribed Broadcasting Service Users (TV Subscription) with Unilateral Change of Subscription Package Price by Subscribed Broadcasting Organisations.” Diponegoro Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2017): 8.
Shidarta. Consumer Protection Law. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, 2004.
Shofie, Yusuf. Perlindungan Konsumen Dan Instrumen-Instrumen Hukumnya. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.
Sidabalok, Janus. “Consumer Protection Law in Indonesia.” Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006, 245.
Simorangkir, Julieta Santi, Syafruddin Kalo, Muhammad Hamdan, and Dedi Harianto. “Crime of Fraud Related to Advertisement of Sale of Goods That Harms Consumers.” USU Law Journal 4, no. 1 (2016): 90.
Sitepu, Rida Ista, and Hana Muhamad. “Efektifitas Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Sebagai Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia 3, no. 2 (2021): 9.
Sudaryatmo, S. Consumer Law & Advocacy. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1999.
Suryadi, Narya, Yuniar Rahmatiar, and Muhamad Abas. “Consumer Protection LawJuridical Review of the Existence of Non-Governmental Consumer Protection Organisations in Karawang District Based on Law Number 8 of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris 7, no. 1 (2023): 212.
Taduri, Januari Nasya Ayu. “The Legal Certainty and Protection of Foreign Investment Againsts Investment Practices in Indonesia.” Lex Scientia Law Review 5, no. 1 (May 30, 2021): 122. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i1.46286.
Tri Siwi Kristiyani Celina. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.
Wahyuni, Hermin Indah. “Politik Media Dalam Transisi Politik: Dari Kontrol Negara Menuju Self-Regulation Mechanism.” Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi 4, no. 1 (2007): 16.
Widjaja, Gunawan, and Ahmad Yani. Law on Consumer Protection. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2000.
Wulandari, Andi Sri Rezky, and Nurdiyana Tadjuddin. Consumer Protection Law. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media, 2018.
Yatini, and Wahyuni Safitri. “Settlement of Consumer Disputes at the Samarinda City Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK).” Jurnal Yuriska (Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum) 7, no. 2 (2015): 90.
YLKI.“Https://Pelayanan.Ylki.or.Id/Index.Php.” https://pelayanan.ylki.or.id/index.php, October 19, 2024.
YLKI.“Https://Pelayanan.Ylki.or.Id/Kb/Faq.Php?Id=2.” https://pelayanan.ylki.or.id/kb/faq.php?id=2, October 19, 2024.
Zuryani, and Mohd Zeti Zakuan. “Institutional Framework as a Consumer Protection Framework in Malaysia.” Proceedings of International Conference on Consumerism 2013 (ICC2013), 2013, 53–54.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
21086Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Satrio Ageng Rihardi, Budi Santoso, Ery Agus Priyono (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) is an open-access license that facilitates the sharing and adaptation of creative works while ensuring proper attribution and preserving the same freedoms for derivative works. This license is designed to be user-friendly and applicable globally, making it a popular choice for a wide range of content, from academic articles to creative arts.
At its core, the Attribution component of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license requires users to give appropriate credit to the original creator of the work. This includes providing a clear citation, linking to the license, and indicating any modifications made. The attribution must be done in a way that does not imply endorsement by the creator of the new use or its creator. This ensures that the original authors are acknowledged for their contributions while allowing their work to be freely used and disseminated.
The ShareAlike aspect of the license mandates that any derivative works or adaptations created from the original must be licensed under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 terms. This means that new works based on the original content must also be freely available and shareable under the same conditions. This provision helps to promote a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement, as it ensures that all adaptations remain accessible to the public and contribute to the collective pool of knowledge and creativity.
