Email this article Trends in Knowledge Management within Open Government
(1) Universitas Airlangga
(2) Universitas Airlangga
Abstract
In realizing the aspirations as a democratic nation, the provision of high-quality information transparency by the government is essential, especially for the legislative body as the people's representation. To transform information into a fundamental consideration for public policies, effective knowledge management is needed from the community, who act as active users of this information transparency. This study aims to analyze the trends in research concerning knowledge management and open government. Data sources were obtained through the Web of Science for publications from 2019 to 2023, focusing on the fields of political science, management, and social reform. The applied method utilized bibliometric analysis with tools such as VOSviewer and Biblioshiny. The study's results identified a total of 2251 keywords, which were then refined to 259 keywords through data selection. From the VOSviewer analysis, the study yielded 1144 links and 4 clusters, indicating the interconnectedness among keywords. This interconnectedness was further illustrated through Network Visualization, Overlay Visualization, and Density Visualization. Meanwhile, the Biblioshiny analysis, conducted using the R Application, involved visualizations like WordCloud, TreeMap, and Trend Topics related to the keywords.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Md Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of science and scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18
Alma’arif, A., & Wargadinata, E. (2021). Is Open Government Aspect adopted in Local Development Planning? 15. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-10-2020.2311871
Ardichvili, A. (2002). Knowledge Management, Human Resource Development, and Internet Technology. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/152342202237522
Bowen, T., & Evans, M. M. (2019). What does knowledge look like? Interpreting diagrams as contemporary hieroglyphics. Visual Communication, 18(4), 475–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218775127
Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, H. S. and R. (2013). Improving the Accuracy of Co-Citation Clustering Using Full Text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(July), 1852–1863. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi
Dadzie, A. S., Lanfranchi, V., & Petrelli, D. (2009). Seeing is believing: Linking data with knowledge. Information Visualization, 8(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1057/ivs.2009.11
Durst, S. (2020). Knowledge risk management in the public sector: insights into a Swedish municipality. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(4), 717–735. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2017-0558
Eck, N. J. Van, & Waltman, L. (2016). Text Mining and Visualization. Text Mining and Visualization, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19007
Fattah, J., Yesiltas, M., & Atan, T. (2022). The Impact of Knowledge Sharing and Participative Decision-Making on Employee Turnover Intention: The Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support. SAGE Open, 12(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221130294
Grimsdottir, E., & Edvardsson, I. R. (2018). Knowledge Management, Knowledge Creation, and Open Innovation in Icelandic SMEs. SAGE Open, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018807320
Hansson, K., Belkacem, K., & Ekenberg, L. (2015). Open Government and Democracy: A Research Review. Social Science Computer Review, 33(5), 540–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314560847
Kitcher, P. (2011). Public knowledge and its discontents. Theory and Research in Education, 9(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878511409618
Laihonen, H. (2019). Knowledge management and hybridity of institutional logics in public sector. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1788429
Mardiyanta, A. (2013). Restore Public Trust Through Deliberative Public Policy Formulation. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 20(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v20i1.1861
Moral-muñoz, J. A., Herrera-viedma, E., Santisteban-espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up- to-date review. El Profesional de La Informa- Ción, 29, 1–20.
Nandiyanto, A. B. D., & Al Husaeni, D. F. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of materials research in Indonesian journal using VOSviewer. Journal of Engineering Research (Kuwait), 9, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.36909/jer.ASSEEE.16037
Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2007). Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.001
Sari, D. K. (2021). Positive Correlation Between General Public Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding COVID-19 Outbreak 1 Month After First Cases Reported in Indonesia. Journal of Community Health, 46(1), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-020-00866-0
van Leeuwen, T., Costas, R., Calero-Medina, C., & Visser, M. (2013). The role of editorial material in bibliometric research performance assessments. Scientometrics, 95(2), 817–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0904-5
Van Lohuizen, C. W. W. (1986). Knowledge Management and Policymaking. Knowledge, 8(1), 12–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708600800102
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Forum Ilmu Sosial
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.