ANALISIS FAKTOR KONFIRMATORI DAN RELIABILITAS KOMPOSIT PADA “WARWICK-EDINBURG MENTAL WELL-BEING SCALE”
(1) Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Widya Dharma
Abstract
Abstrak. Tujuan penelitian ini melakukan uji validasi dan uji reliabilitas mengenai konsep kesejahteraan mental melalui skala well being Warwick-Edinburg. Mental well being adalah gambaran kenyamanan terkait kondisi mental pada mind set individu. Kondisi mental well-being bersifat fluktuatif dan relatif. Metode penelitian menggunakan tehnik standar CFA untuk melakukan penyelidikan mengenai konstruk laten dalam kesejahteraan mental dan uji reliabilitas menggunakan composite reliability dari Raykov. Subjek penelitian berjumlah 200 orang dengan latar belakang pendidikan mahasiswa dan pelajar, yang berusia remaja. Piranti lunak yang digunakan adalah R dan Lisrel 8.8 (student version). Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa ada beberapa indikator mental well-beling yang tidak memenuhi standar. Model dalam menjelaskan antara matriks kovarian data dengan teori juga bisa dikatakan kurang fit. Meskipun demikian uji reliabilitas tercapai koefisien yang signifikan dan bisa dikatakan layak.
Kata kunci : kesejahteraan mental, validitas, reliabilitas
Abstract. This study was to test the validation and reliability testing of the concept of mental wellbeing through Edinburg Warwick well being scale. Mental well being is the condition of an individual who feels comfort in his mind set about his mental state. Therefore, the condition of mental wellbeing is relative and flutuatif in nature. Research method using standard CFA to conduct an investigation regarding the latent constructs in mental wellbeing and reliability testing using the composite reliability of Raykov. Subjects range from 200 people with an educational background of students and students, aged teenagers. The software used is R and LISREL 8.8 (student version). The results of the study explained that there are several indicators of mental well-being that does not meet the standard fit. The model in explaining covariance matrix of data with theory also somewhat less fit. Nonetheless reliability test achieved significant coefficients.
Keyword: mental wellbeing, validity, reliability
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anatasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological Testing (7th edition). New York: Macmillan.
Angner, E. (2011). Subjective well – being. The Journal of Socio-Economics 39 (2010) 361–368.
Bartram, D, J. Yadegarfar, G. Sinclair, J, M, A. & Baldwin, D, S. (2011). Validation of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) as an overall indicator of population mental health and well-being in the UK veterinary profession.The Veterinary Journal 187 (2011) 397–398.
Bornstein, M, H. Davidson, L. Keyes, C, L, M. & Moore, K, A. (2003). Well-Being – Positive Development Accros The Life Course. Mahwah, New Jersey. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Brown, T, A. 2006. Conformatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. The Guilford Press. America, USA.
Feldt, L. S., & Brennan, R. L. (1989).Reliability. In R. H. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Graham, J, M. (2006).Congeneric and (Essentially) Tau-Equivalent Estimates of Score Reliability What They Are and How to Use Them. Educational and Psychological Measurement. Volume 66, Number 6, December 2006 930-944
Gorard, S. & Taylor, C. (2004).Combining Methods in Educational and Social Research. USA. Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education.
Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory Factor Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling : Guidelines for Determining Model Fit Structural equation modelling : guidelines for determining model fit. Journal of Business Research, 6, 53-60.
Humphreys, D, K. Goodman, A. & Ogilvie, D. (2013). Associations between active commuting and physical and mental wellbeing. Preventive Medicine, 57, (2013), 135 – 139.
Hair, J.F, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Thatam, & W.C. Black. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis With Reading, 4Thedition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Jorgensen, B, S. Jamieson, R, D, & Martin, J, F. (2010). Income, sense of community and subjective well-being: Combining economic and psychological variables. Journal of Economic Psychology 31 (2010) 612 – 623.
Jackson, Y. (2006). Encyclopedia of Multicultural Psychology. Thousand Oaks, California. Sage Publication, Inc.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2004). LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide. Chichago: Scientific Software International.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 233-265). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3rded). In David A. Kenny (Eds.), Methodology in the Social Sciences.New York: The Guilford Press.
Keith, K, D. (2011). Cross-Cultural Psychology - Contemporary Themes and Perspectives. Willey – Blackwell. A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication.
Moore, M. Bates, M, Brierley-Bwers, P. Taafe, P, & Clymer, R. (2012). Well Being and Its Measurement. Defence Centers of Excellent for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injures.
Mason, P. & Kearns, A. (2013). Physical activity and mental wellbeing in deprived neighbourhoods. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 6 (2013), 111 – 117.
McGrath, R, E. (2011). Quantitative Model of Psychology. USA. Washington D. C. American Psychological Association, Press.
Newbigging K, Bola M, Shah A: Scoping exercise with Black and minorityethnic groups on perceptions of mental wellbeing in Scotland. Scotland: NHSHealth; 2008.
http://www.healthscotland.com/documents/2803.aspx.
Proctor, R, W. & Capaldi, E, J. (2006). Why Science Matters – Understanding The Methods of Psychological Research. USA. Blackwell Publishing.
Padilla, A. M., & Borsato, G. N. (2008). Issues in Culturally Appropriate Psychoeducational Assessment. In L. A. Suzuki, & J. G. Ponterotto (Eds.), Handbook Of Multicultural Assessment : Clinical, Psychological, and Educational Applications (3rd ed., pp. 5-21). New Jersey: John Willey & Sons.
Phye, G, D. Robinson, D, H. & Levin, J, R. (2005). Empirical Methods for Evaluating Educational Interventions. San Diego, USA. Elsevier Academic Press.
Robert, P. (2006). Reliability and validity in research.Journal ofNursing Standard. 20, 44, 41 – 45.
Rentfrow, P, J. Mellander, C. & Florida, R. (2009). Happy States of America: A state-level analysis of psychological, economic, and social well-being. Journal of Research in Personality 43 (2009) 1073–1082.
Rao, C, R. & Sinharay, S. (2007). The Handbook of Statistics on Psychometrics – Volume 26.USA. 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Raykov, T. (2007). Reliability if deleted, not ‘alpha if deleted’ : Evaluation of Scale Reliability Following Component Deletion. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (2007), 60, 201–216.
Raykov, T. (1997a). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 173–184.
Ryan, M, R. & Huta, V. 2009. Wellness of Healthy Functioning or Wellness as Happiness :the importance of eudemonic thinking. The Journal of Postive Psychology Vol 4, No.3, pp 202 – 204.
Ryan, M, R. & Deci, E, L. 2000. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 2000, Vol 11, No 4, pp 227 – 268.
Shanafelt, T, D. Novotny, P. Johnson, M, E. Zhao, X. Steensma, D, P. Lacy, M, Q. Rubin, J. & Sloan, J. (2005). The Well-Being and Personal Wellness Promotion Strategies of Medical Oncologists in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Laboratory/Clinical Translational Research Oncology, 2005 ; 68: 23–32.
Sawilowsky, S. S. (2007). Construct Validity. In Neil J. Salkind (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics.(pp.178-180). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Sireci, S. G. (2007). Content Validity.In Neil J. Salkind (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics (pp.181-183). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Shiraev, E, B. & Levy, D, A. (2010).Cross – Cultural Psychology – Critical Thinking and Contemporary Application. Boston, New York. Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Allyn & Bacon.
Snyder, C, R. & Lopez, S, J. (2002).Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford University Press
Sacolo, H, N. Chung, M, H. Chu, H. Liao, Y, M. Chen, C, H. Liang Ou, K. I Chang, L. & Chou, K, R. (2013). High Risk Sexual Behaviors for HIV among the In-SchoolYouth in Swaziland: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. PLos ONE July 2013 | Volume 8 | Issue 7 | e67289.
Socan, G. (2000). Assesment of Reliability When Test Items Are Not Essentially t-Equivalent. Developments in Survey Methodology Metodološki zvezki, 15, Ljubljana: FDV, 2000.
Talbott, W, J. (2010). Human Right and Human Well Being. Oxford, New York. Oxford University Press, Inc.
Tennant, R. Hiller, L. Fishwick, R, Platt, S. Joseph, S, Weich S. Parkinson, J. Secker, J. & Stewart-Brown, S. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) : development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2007, 5:63.
Tokuda, Y. Doba, N. Butler, J, P. & Paasche-Orlow, M, K. (2009). Health literacy and physical and psychological wellbeing in Japanese adults. Patient Education and Counseling 75 (2009) 411–417.
Taggart, F. Friede, T. Weich, S. Clarke, A. Johnson, M. & Stewart-Brown, S. (2013). Cross cultural evaluation of the Warwick- Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS) –a mixed methods study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2013, 11:27.
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis – Understanding Concept and Applications. Washington, D.C. American Psychological Association
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.