PROGRAM PSIKOEDUASI BULLYING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN EFIKASI DIRI GURU DALAM MENANGANI BULLYING DI SEKOLAH DASAR

Sukma Adi Galuh Amawidyati(1), Amrihana Muhammad(2), Edy Purwanto(3),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/intuisi.v9i3.14117


(1) Jurusan Psikologi Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Semarang
(2) Jurusan Psikologi Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Semarang
(3) Jurusan Psikologi Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

Abstrak. Fenomena bullying semakin mudah dijumpai di banyak tempat, tak terkecuali di dalam lingkungan sekolah.Hal ini semakin memprihatinkan tatkala pihak-pihak yang idealnya bisa berperan penting untuk menanggulangi atau mencegah kemunculan fenomena bullying disekolah tampak tidak paham, tidak peduli, atau pun tidak mampu melakukan tindakan yang ideal. Program Psikoedukasi bullying pada guru diharapkan bisa menjadi salah satu cara yang efektif untuk memperbaiki kondisi yang ada. Penelitan ini menggunakan penelitian eksperimen kuasi dengan desain The one group pretest – posttest. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 14 orang guru di salah satu SD Negeri di daerah Gunungpati Semarang. Materi program psikoedukasi bullying pada penelitian ini mencakup definisi dan prevalensi bullying di Indonesia, bentuk-bentuk bullying, karakteristik korban, karakteristik pelaku, dampak bullying, dan penanganan bullying. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa program psikoedukasi bullying efektif untuk meningkatkan efikasi guru dalam menangani bullying (Z=-2,138;  p=0,033; p<0,05). Disarankan kegiatan psikoedukasi bullying semacam ini bisa dilaksanakan secara berkala dilokasi yang sama dan atau digandakan penyelenggaraannya di lokasi lain yang membutuhkan.

Kata Kunci: bullying, program psikoedukasi, efikasi guru

 

 

Abstract.Bullyinghas become serious problem in school. Evidence from number of studies shows that teachers has no sufficient and effective skill in handling bullying. Teachers’ self – efficacy influences effective intervention in handling bullying. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of Bullying Psychoeducation Program to improve teachers’ self-efficacy in dealing with bullying. This research used quasi experimental design with the one group pretest-posttest design. The subjects of this research are 14 teachers in one of Elementary School in Gunungpati Semarang. The results showed that the Bullying Psychoeducation Program was effective to improve teachers’ self–efficacy in dealing with bullying (Z = -2.138; p = 0.033; p <0.05). It is suggested that such Bullying Psychoeducation Program can be carried out periodically at the same location and / or duplicated in other locations where needed.

Keywords

bullying, Bullying Psychoeducation Program, Teachers’ self – efficacy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ajzen, I., &Fishbein, M. (1980).Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey : Prentice-Hall.

Amawidyati, S. A. G. (2010). Pelatihan Asertivitas Untuk Menurunkan Frekuensi Peristiwa Bullying Yang Dialami Oleh Korban.Tesis. Magister Profesi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta. Tidak diterbitkan.

Beran, T. N., Tutty, L., & Steinrath, G. (2004). An evaluation of a bullying prevention program for elementary schools. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 19, 99-116.

Bernard, M. E., Milne, M. L. (2008).Safe Schools are Effective Schools, School Procedures and Practices for Responding to Students Who Bully. A Report for Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. Retrieved on September 10, 2008, from http://www.eduweb. vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/stuman/wellbeing/Responding_to_Students_who_Bully-May_2008.pdf.

Carney, A. G., & Merrel, K. W. (2001).Bullying in schools: perspective on understanding and preventing an international problem.School Psychology International, 22, 364-382.

Cassidy, T. (2009). Bullying and victimisation in school children : the role of social identity, problem-solving style, and family and school context. Social Psycology Education, 12, 63-76.

Choi, L. (2017). Sources of Primay School Teacher’s Self – Efficacy in Dealing With Bullying Among Students: A Case Study in Rural Primary School Teacher’s in Sarawak. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 1 (7), 106 – 116.

Choi, L. (2016). Teacher’s Self-Efficacy in Dealing With Bullying Among Secondary School Students in Malaysia. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, (4), 48 – 56.

Crothers, L.M., Kolbert, J.B. (2008). Tackling a problematic behavior management issues : Teachers’ intervention in childhood bullying problems. Intervention in School and Clinic, 4, 132 – 139.

Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom.School Psychology International, 21, 22-36.

Craig, W. M., Henderson, K., & Murphy, J. G. (2000).Prospective teachers’ attitudes toward bullying and victimization.School Psychology International, 21, 5 – 21

Craig, W., Pepler, D., Blais, J. (2007). Responding to bullying, what works?.School Psychology International, 28, 465-477.

Dioguardi & Theodore, 2006.Understanding and addressing peer victimization among students. In Jimerson, S. R & Furlong, M. J. (Eds). Handbook of School Violence and School Safety: From Research to Practice. Mahwah, New Jersey : Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Djuwita, R. (2006). Bullying: Masalah tersembunyi dalam dunia pendidikan di Indonesia, diakses pada tanggal 18 April 2009, dari http://www.sejiwa.org/en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5&Itemid=1

Detik News. (2007). Banyak Guru Anggap Bullying Bukan Masalah Serius, diakses pada tanggal 24 Agustus 2009, dari http://www.detiknews.com/index. php/detik.read/tahun/2007/bulan/04/tgl/29/time/040220/idnews/773882/idkanal/10.

Dioguardi & Theodore, 2006.Understanding and addressing peer victimization among students. In Jimerson, S. R & Furlong, M. J. (Eds). Handbook of School Violence and School Safety: From Research to Practice. Mahwah, New Jersey : Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Djuwita, R. (2006). Bullying: Masalah tersembunyi dalam dunia pendidikan di Indonesia, diakses pada tanggal 18 April 2009, dari http://www.sejiwa.org/ en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5&Itemid=1

Fadhlia, T.N. (2009). Kepedulian Terhadap Sahabat Untuk Meningkatkan Perilaku Bertanggungjawab pada Saksi Bullying. Tesis. Magister Profesi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta. Tidak diterbitkan.

Fadhlia, T. N. (2009). Kepedulian Terhadap Sahabat untuk Meningkatkan Perilaku Bertanggung Jawab Pada Saksi Bullying. An – Nafs,03, 48-64.

Froschl, M., Sprung, B., Mullin-Rindler, N., Stein, N., & Gropper, N. (1998). Quit it! A Teachers Guide on Teasing and Bullying for Use with Students in Grades K-3. New York: Educational Equity Concepts, Inc.

Fox, C. L., Boulton, M. J. (2005). The social problems of victims of bullying: Self, peer, and teacher perceptions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 313-328.

Novick, R. M., & Isaacs, J. (2010). Telling is compelling: The impact of student reports of bullying on teacherintervention. Educational Psychology, 30, 283–296.

Nugroho, S. (2009). Program psikoedukasi untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan dan keterampilan guru dalam menangani bullying. Tesis. Magister Profesi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta. Tidak diterbitkan.

Nugroho & Adiyanti.(2011). Program psikoedukasi untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan dan keterampilan guru dalam menangani bullying. Jurnal Intervensi Psikologi, 3(1), 25 – 48.

Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell.

Orpinas, P & Horne, A. M. (2006).Bullying Prevention, Creating a Positive School Climate and Developing Social Competence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Patrick, J. (1992). Training Research and Practice. San Diego. CA: Academic Press.

Pereira, B., Mendonca, D., Neto, C., Valente, L., Smith, P. K. (2004). Bullying in portuguese schools. School Psychology International, 25 (2), 241-254.

Rahman, N., Choi, L., Raman, A., Rathakrishnan, M. (2017). Primay School Teacher’s Self Efficacy inHandling School Bullying : A Case Study. International Journal of English Literatureand Social Science, 4 (2), 187 – 202.

Rigby, K. (2002). New Perspective on Bullying. London: Jessica Kingsley.

Rigby, K. (2003). Addresing bullying in schools: Theory and practice. Australian Institute of Criminology, 259, 1-6.

Rini, B. D. C. (2008). Pelatihan asertif untuk korban bullying pada siswa sekolah dasar. Tesis. Tidak diterbitkan. Yogyakarta : Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Sanders, C. E. & Phye, G. D. (2004). Bullying Implication for The Classroom. London: Elsevier Academic Press.

Sapouna, M. (2008). Bullying in greek primary and secondary schools. Social Psychology International, 29, 199-233.

Saptandari, E. W. & Adiyanti.(2013). Mengurangi Bullying Melalui Program Pelatihan “Guru Peduliâ€.Jurnal Psikologi. 40 (2). 193 – 210.

Schwartz, D. (2000). Subtypes of victims and aggressors in children’s peer group.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 28, 181-192.

Seniati, L.,Yulianto, A.,dan Setiadi, BN. 2011. Psikologi Eksperimen. Jakarta : PT.Indeks

Sharp, S., Cowie, H., Smith, P. K. (1994).How to respond to bullying behavior.In Sharp, S, & Smith, P. K. (Eds.), Tackling Bullying in Your School (pp. 79-101). London: Routledge.

Sharp, S., Smith, P. K. (1994).Understanding bullying.In Sharp, S, & Smith, P. K. (Eds.), Tackling Bullying in Your School (pp.1-5). London: Routledge.

Skinner, A. T., Babinski, L. M, & Gifford, E. (2014).Tearchers’ expectation and self-efficacy for working with bulliesand victims. Psychology in the Schools, 51(1), 72-84

Suyatno.(2008). Guru Perlu Tahu Bullying (Tindak Kekerasan) di Sekolah, diakses pada tanggal 25 Januari 2009, dari http://garduguru.blogspot.com /2008/05/guru-perlu-tahu-bullying-tindak.html.

Whitted, K. S., Dupper, D. R. (2005). Best practice for preventing and reducing bullying in school. Children and School, 27, 167 – 176.

Yoon, J. S. (2004). Predicting teacher interventions in bullying situations.Education and Treatment of Children, 27,

– 45.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.