PENGARUH TRAINING UMUM ORIENTASI (TUO) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN OCCUPATIONAL SELF EFFICACY PADA KARYAWAN BARU

Alfira Bahro Sabrina(1), Amri Hana Muhammad(2), Anna Undarwati(3),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/intuisi.v10i2.17495


(1) Jurusan Psikologi, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Semarang
(2) Jurusan Psikologi, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Semarang
(3) Jurusan Psikologi, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

 

Abstrak. Sebagian besar individu yang memulai masuk dunia kerja belum tahu bagaimana rincian kerja yang akan ditugaskan kepadanya terutama pada individu yang mengalami masa transisi dari pelajar. Sangatlah mungkin individu yang baru masuk dunia kerja merasa tidak mampu karena belum paham dengan apa yang harus dikerjakan ketika bekerja nantinya. Rasa ketidakmampuan dalam hal ini jika ditinjau dari sudut psikologis merupakan bentuk kurangnya keyakinan akan kemampuan dirinya sendiri dan ini dapat menghambat individu untuk meraih kesuksesan di masa depan. Keyakinan akan  kemampuan dan kompetensi dalam menampilkan unjuk kerja disebut occupational self efficacy. PT Indah Kiat Pulp and Paper Serang Mill, Tbk memiliki agenda training umum orientasi setiap bulannya yang dilaksanakan untuk karyawan baru diharapkan dengan adanya training ini dapat meningkatkan occupational self efficacy pada karyawan baru. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui gambaran baik sebelum maupun sesudah dilakukannya training umum orientasi (TUO) terhadap occupational self efficacy dan menguji ada tidaknya pengaruh training umum orientasi (TUO) terhadap occupational self efficacy. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian kuantitatif eksperimen dan dengan desain one group pre-test posttest design dengan pretest 1 kali dan posttest 1 kali. Perlakuan yang diberikan adalah training umum orientasi yang dilaksanakan selama 3 hari. Data penelitian diambil menggunakan skala occupational self efficacy dengan koefisien realibilitas sebesar 0,950 dan dari 40 item diperoleh 29 item yang valid. Analisis data menggunakan teknik uji non parametrik wilcoxon signed ranks test dengan bantuan software pengolahan data. Hasil uji wilcoxon signed ranks test diperoleh nilai Z = -3,927 dengan tingkat signifikansi (sig (2-tailed)= 0,000) kurang dari α 5% maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa penelitian ini terdapat perbedaan occupational self efficacy  sebelum dan sesudah diberikan training umum orientasi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa training umum orientasi (TUO) dapat meningkatkan occupational self efficacy pada karyawan baru.

 

Abstract. Most individuals who embark on entering the workforce do not yet know how the details of work will be assigned to them, especially on individuals who are experiencing a transition from the learner. It is possible that individuals who are new to the workplace feel inadequate because they have not understood what to do when working later. Disability in this case if viewed from a psychological point of view is a form of lack of confidence in his own ability and this can hinder individuals to achieve success in the future. The belief in the ability and competence in performing performance is called occupational self efficacy. PT Indah Kiat Pulp and Paper Serang Mill, Tbk has a general orientation training agenda every month for new employees expected with this training can increase occupational self efficacy in new employees.

The aim of this research is to know the description before and after the general orientation training (TUO) to occupational self efficacy and to test whether there is influence of general training orientation (TUO) to occupational self efficacy. This research uses experimental quantitative research type and with one group pre-test posttest design design with pretest 1 time and posttest 1 time. The treatment provided is a general training orientation that is carried out for 3 days. The research data was taken using occupational self efficacy scale with realibility coefficient of 0.950 and from 40 items obtained 29 valid items.

Data analysis using non parametric test technique wilcoxon signed ranks test with the help of data processing software. Wilcoxon signed ranks test results obtained Z = -3,927 with significance level (sig (2-tailed) = 0,000) less than α 5% it can be concluded that this study there are differences in occupational self efficacy before and after being given general training orientation. Based on the result of research can be concluded that general training orientation (TUO) can increase occupational self efficacy in new employees.

 

Keywords

training, occupational self efficacy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alwisol.(2009). Psikologi Kepribadian. Malang: UMM Press.

Arikunto, S. (2002).Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2006).Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2010).Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

As’ad, M. (2001).Psikologi Industri. Yogyakarta: Liberty Yogyakarta.

Azwar, S. (2003).Sikap Manusia: Teori dan Pengukurannya Edisi Kedua. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2010). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2012). Metode Penelitian.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S.(2014). Metode Penelitian.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bandura, A. (1995). Self efficacy in Changing Societies.New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bandura, A.(1997). Social Lerning Theory.New Jessy: Englewood Cliffs Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A.(2006). Self efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents.Cambridge University Press.

Bandura, A. (2010). Self efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Schyns, G. V. (2010). A New Occupational Self Efficacy Scale And Its Relation Ro Personality Contruct And Organizational Variables. European Journal Of Work And Organizational Psychology , 219-241.

Chushway, B. (2002). Human Resource Management Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.

Dessler, G. (2008). Human Resources Management (11th ed). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

Dipboye, et al. (1994).Understanding Industrial and Organizational Psychology: An Integrated Approach.Florida: Harcourt Brace College Publishers

Feist, J., & Feist, G. (1998).Theories Of Personality (Fourth Edition).United State Of America.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention And Behavior An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading.

Gist, M. E., Stevens, C. K. and Bavetta, A. G. (1991).‘Effects of self-efficacy and post-training intervention on the acquisition and maintenance of complex interpersonal skills’, Personnel Psychology, 44,837-861.

Gomersall, E. R. and Myers, M. S. (1966). ‘Breakthrough in on-the-job training’, Harvard Business Review, 44,62-72.

Heslin, P. A., & Klehe, U. C. (2006).Self-efficacy.Encyclopedia of Industrial/Organizational Psychology. Vo.2, p. 705-708. Thousand Oaks:Sage.

Hjelle, L. A., & Ziegler, D. J. (1992).Personality Theories Basic Assumptions, Research, and Applications. Singapore: McGraw Hill International BookCompany.

Ivancevich, J. M., Konopaske, R., & Matteson, M. T. (2011).Organizational behavior and management (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Jex, S. M., Paul D. Bliese; Sheri Buzzel;& Jessica Primeau. (2001). The Impact of Self-Efficacy on Stressor-Strain Relations: Coping Style as an Explanatory Mechanism. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 86 no. 3 h. 401-409

Kaswan.(2011). Pelatihan dan Pengembangan. Cetakan Satu. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Kirkpatrick, Donald L & James D. (2006). EvaluationTraining Program: The Four Level3rd Ed.San Francisco: Berret-Koehler Publisher.

Latipun. (2010). Psikologi Eksperimen. Malang: UMM Press.

Latipun.(2011). Psikologi Eksperimen. Malang:UMMPress

Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Self-Efficacy in the workplace: implications for motivation and performance. International journal of management, business, and administration, 14(1), 1-6.

Luthans, F. (2005).Organizational Behavior 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Lynton, R. (1984). Pelatihan dan Pengembangan Tenaga Kerja.Jakarta : PT. Midas Surya Grafindo.

Nawangsari, N. A. (2001). Pengaruh Self-Efficacy dan expectancy-Value Terhadap Kecemasan Mengahadapi Pelajaran Matematika.Jurnal Insan MediaPsikologi Vol 3 (75-88).

Noe, et al. (2008). Human Resource Management: Gaining A Competitive Advantage,6th ed. New York:McGraw-Hill

Purwanto, E. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Semarang: Swadaya Manunggal.

Rahayu, I.T., Ardani, T.A., dan Suistyaningsih. (2004). Hubungan Pola Pikir Positif Dengan Kecemasan Berbicara di Depan Umum.Jurnal Psikologi UNDIP, Vol. 1, No.2, 131-134

Rigotti, T., Schyns, B. & Mohr, G. (2008).A short version of the occupational self efficacy scale. Structural and construct validity across five countries. Journal of Career Assessment, 16, 238-255.

Robbins, S. P. (2003). Perilaku Organisasi. Gramedia: Jakarta.

Santrock. J. W. (2003). Adolescence,perkembangan remaja. Edisi keenam. Jakarta:Erlangga.

Sasongko, J.W. (2005). Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Pembelajaran terhadap Manfaat Pelatihan Ditijau Dari Perspektif Peserta Pelatihan.Anima, Indonesian Psychologi Journal.Vol.20. No.3 (253-269).

Schunk, D.H. (2003). Self-Efficacy for Reading and Writing: Influence of Modeling, Goal Setting, and Self-Evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 159-172.

Schyns, B., & von Collani, G. (2002). A new occupational self-efficacy scale and its relation to personality constructs and organizational variables. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 219-241.

Schyns, B., & Moldzio, T. (2009).The Value of Occupational Self Efficacy in Selection and Development.British academy of management.15-17.

Seniati, Liche., Yulianto, Aries & Setiadi, B.N. (2009). Psikologi Eksperimen. Jakarta: Indeks.

Seniati.(2011). Psikologi Eksperimen. Jakarta: PT Indeks

Stajkovic, A. D. & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240-261.

Sulistyawati, R., Nurtjahjanti, H., & Prihatsanti, U. (2012). The Relationship Between Work Efficacy With Job Insecurity On Production Employees PT “X†Semarang. Jurnal Psikologi, Vol: 1, No: 1, Tahun 2012, Hal. 139-153.

Tanajaya, M & Srimulyani N. (1995).Perbedaan Faktor-faktor Keikatan Kerja Karyawan terhadap Organisasi Ditinjau dari Jenis Kelamin.JurnalPsikologi Indonesia. No. 1 h. 8-16.

Tracey, J., Hinkin, T R., Tannenbaum, S., Mathieu, J E, (2001). The Influence of Individual Characteistics and The Work Environment on Varying Level of Training Outcome, Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol 12 5-23.

Yuwono, I. (2005). Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi.Surabaya: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Airlangga.

Wahyudin, A. (2015). Metode Penelitian. Semarang: UNNESPress

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.