INTENSI PERILAKU PRO-KONSERVASI DITINJAU DARI ORIENTASI NILAI INDIVIDU PADA MAHASISWA UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SEMARANG
(1) Jurusan Psikologi, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Semarang
(2) Jurusan Psikologi, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Semarang
(3) Jurusan Psikologi, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Abstract
Abstrak.Pendidikan Lingkungan Hidup (PLH) bertujuan agar mahasiswa dapat memahami mengenai paradigma, pengertian, dan etika lingkungan hidup. Selama ini UNNES telah memberikan mata kuliah Pendidikan Lingkungan Hidup (PLH) kepada mahasiswa, namun evaluasi dan efeknya terhadap orientasi nilai dan intensi berperilaku pro-konservasi (lingkungan) masih belum banyak diteliti sehingga diperlukan analisis untuk mengetahui efek dari PLH yang sudah dijalankan sebagai salah satu matakuliah wajib di UNNES. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui intensi perilaku pro-konservasi pada mahasiswa UNNES ditinjau dari orientasi nilai individu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif, dengan subjek  mahasiswa UNNES yang telah lulus, atau sedang mengambil mata kuliah PLH atau Pendidikan Konservasi.Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode skala, yaitu Skala Intensi Perilaku Pro-Konservasi dan Skala Orientasi Nilai. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar mahasiswa UNNES yang telah mengambil mata kuliah PLH mempunyai intensi perilaku pro-konservasi pada kategori sedang (71,5%) dan tinggi (28,2%), hal ini membuktikan bahwa PLH memberikan niat yang kuat untuk berperilaku pro lingkungan. Pada variabel orientasi nilai, ditemukan bahwa orientasi nilai kompetitor 40,8%, sedangkan orientasi nilai prososialnya adalah 29,4%. Sebanyak 91 mahasiswa mempunyai orientasi nilai yang bercampur dari ketiga orientasi nilai. Berdasarkan perhitungan juga ditemukan bahwa intensi perilaku pro-konservasi tidak berbeda ditinjau dari orientasi nilai individu, yaitu dengan nilai F=1,983 (F>0,05).
Â
Abstract. Environmental Education (EE) aims to make students can understand about the paradigm, understanding, and environmental ethics. UNNES has provided Environmental Education (EE) courses, but its evaluation and its effect on value orientation and intention of pro-conservation (environment) behavior have not been studied so much so that analysis is needed to know the effect of EE which has been run as one of compulsory courses at UNNES. This study aims to determine the intentions of pro-conservation behavior in UNNES students viewed from the orientation of individual values. The research method used is quantitative, with the subject of UNNES students who have taken or are still taking a course of EE or Conservation Education. Data collection method used in this research is scale method, that is Pro-Conservation Behavior Scale and Value Orientation Scale. The results of this study indicate that most of UNNES students who have taken the course of PLH have intention of pro-conservation behavior in medium category (71,5%) and high (28,2%), this proves that PLH give strong intention to behave pro-environmentally. In the value orientation variable, it was found that the competitor's value orientation was 40.8%, while the prosocial value orientation was 29.4%. A total of 91 students have a mixed value orientation of the three value orientations. Based on the analysis also found that the intention of pro-conservation behavior is not different in terms of the orientation of individual values, with the value F = 1,983 (F> 0.05).
Â
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allen, J. B., & Ferrand, J. L. (1999). Environmental Locus of Control, Sympathy, and Proenvironmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 31(3), 338–353. doi:10.1177/00139169921972137
Allport, G. W. (1963). Pattern and growth in personality. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Arcury, T. A., & Christianson, E. H. (1993). Rural-urban differences in environmental knowledge and action. Journal of Environmental Education, 25(1), 19-25.
Baron, R.A. & Byrne, D. (2012). Psikologi Sosial Jilid 2. Jakarta: Erlangga
Borden, D.& Francis, J.L. (1978) Who cares about ecology? Personality and sex difference in environmental concern, Journal of Personality, 46, 190–203.
Burgess, J., Harrison, C. & Filius, P. (1998) Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1445–1460.
Corraliza, J. A., & Berenguer, J. (2000). Environmental values, beliefs, and actions. A situational approach. Environment and Behavior, 32, 832-848
De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2007). Value orientations and environmental beliefs in five
countries: Validity of an instrument to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value
orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(3), 318-332.
Diekmann, A., & Franzen, A. (1999). The Wealth of Nations and Environmental Concern. Environment and Behavior, 31(4), 540–549. doi:10.1177/00139169921972227
Eagly, A. H., & Kulesa, P. (1997). Attitudes, attitude structure, and resistance to change: Implications for persuasion on environmental issues. In M. H. Bazerman, D. M. Messick, A. E. Tenbrunsel, & K. A. Wade-Benzoni (Eds.), Environment, ethics, and behavior: The psychology of environmental valuation and degradation, 122-153. San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
Eisenberg, N. & Miller, P. (1987) The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors.Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91–119.
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
GarcÃa Mira, R., Real Deus, E., Durán RodrÃguez, M., & Romay MartÃnez, J. (2003). Predicting environmental attitudes and behavior. In G. Moser, E. Pol, Y. Bernard, M. Bonnes, J. A. Corraliza, & M. V. Giuliani (Eds.). People, places and sustainability. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber
Gärling, T., Fujii, S., Gärling, A., & Jakobsson, C. (2003). Moderating effects of social value orientation on determinants of proenvironmental behavior intention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 1-9
Gigliotti, L. M. (1993). Environmental attitudes: 20 years of change. Journal of Environmental
Education, 22(1), 15-26.
Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H.R. & Tomera, A.N. (1986–87). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible pro-environmental behavior: a meta-analysis.The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8.
Hungerford, H. R.,&Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21.
Iozzi, L. A. (1989a). What research says to the educator. Part one: Environmental education and the affective domain. Journal of Environmental Education, 20(3), 3-9.
Iozzi, L. A. (1989b). What research says to the educator. Part two: Environmental education and the affective domain. Journal of Environmental Education 20(4), 6-13.
Joireman, J. A., Lasane, T. P., Bennett, J., Richards, D., & Solaimani, S. (2001). Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 133-155
Juraite, Kristina. (2002). Environmental Consciousness and Mass Communication. Doctoral Thesis. Kaunas: Vytautas Magnus University.
Lehmann, J. (1999).Befunde empirischer Forschung zu Umweltbildung und Umweltbewusstsein. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
Magnus, V. J., Martinez, P.,&Pedauye, R. (1997). Analysis of environmental concepts and attitudes among biology degree students. Journal of Environmental Education, 29(1), 28-33.
McCarty, J. A., & Shrum, L. J. (1994). The recycling of solid wastes: Personal values, value orientations, and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behavior. Journal of Business Research, 30, 53-62
Newhouse. (1990). Implications of attitude and behavior research for environmental conservation. The Journal of Environmental Education. 22(1), 26-32.
Nilsson, A., Von Borgstede, C., & Biel, A. (2004). Willingness to accept climate change strategies: The effect of values and norms. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 267-277.
Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34, 740-756.
Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 339-347.
Pomerantz, L. (1990-1991). Evaluation of natural resource education materials: Implications for resource management. Journal of Environmental Education, 22(2), 16-23.
Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2004). Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36, 70-93.
Regis, D. (1990). Self-concept and conformity in theories of health education. Doctoral dissertation. School of Education: University of Exeter. http://helios.ex.ac.uk/, dregis/ PhD/Contents.html
Schwartz, S.H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism, in: L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in
Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10. New York: Academic Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances
and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.).Advances in experimental social
psychology. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures. Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268-290.
Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehman, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the crosscultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519-542.
Sia, A.P., Hungerford, H.R. & Tomera, A.N. (1985–86) Selected predictors of responsible environmental behavior: an analysis.The Journal of Environmental Education, 17(2),31–40.
Stapp,W. B., Bennett, D., Bryan,W., Jr., Fulton, J., MacGregor, J., Nowak, P., Swan, J.,Wall, R.,& Havlick, S. (1969). The concept of environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 1(1), 30-31
Steg, L., Dreijerink, L. & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25,415–425.
Stern, P.S., Dietz, T. & Karlof, L. (1993). Values orientation, gender, and environmental
concern, Environment and Behavior, 25(3), 322–348.
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424.
Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2002). Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 605-630.
Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 434-447.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.