Overexcitability Berdasar Keberbakatan
(1) Jurusan Psikologi, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
(3) Jurusan Psikologi, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Abstract
Setiap anak memiliki karakteristik yang berbeda. Setiap pendidik harus memahami perbedaan karakteristik siswanya agar dapat menyiapakan metode pembelajaran yang sesuai sehingga tujuan pembelajaran dapat dicapai secara optimal. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menguji apakah siswa berbakat memiliki karakteristik overexcitability dengan cara membandingkan skor overexcitability antara siswa berbakat dan siswa regular. Sampel yang dilibatkan dalam penelitian ini adalah 173 siswa di salah satu SMAN di Tangerang Selatan yang merupakan siswa program akselerasi dan regular. Overexcitability diukur menggunakan Instrumen hasil adaptasi dari Overexcitability Questionnaire II (OEQ II). Analisis data yang digunakan adalah independent sample t-test. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa H0 ditolak (Sig. 0.001, p < 0.05)yang berarti siswa berbakat memiliki skor overexcitability yang lebih tinggi dari siswa regular. Namun, yang signifikan hanya psychomotor (Sig. 0.041, p < 0.05), intellectual (Sig. 0.009, p < 0.05), dan imaginational overexcitability (Sig. 0.000, p < 0.05).
Every child has different characteristics. Each educator must understand the different characteristics of his students in order to be able to prepare appropriate learning methods so that learning objectives can be achieved optimally. This research was conducted to test whether gifted students have overexcitability characteristics by comparing overexcitability scores between gifted students and regular students. Sample of this study includes 173 students of SMAN in Tangerang Selatan that were in acceleration and regular program. Overexcitability measured by an adaptation version of the Overexcitability Questionnaire II (OEQ II). Data analysis used is independent sample t-test. The results showed that H0 was rejected (Sig. 0.001, p <0.05) which means that gifted students have a higher overexcitability score than regular students. However, the only significant ones were psychomotor (Sig. 0.041, p < 0.05), intellectual (Sig. 0.009, p < 0.05), and imaginational overexcitability (Sig. 0.000, p < 0.05).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ackerman, C. M. (1997). Identifying gifted adolescents using personality characteristics: Dabrowski’s overexcitabilities. Roeper Review, 19(4), 229–236. Doi: 10.1080/02783199709553835
Ackerman, C. M. (2009). The essential elements of dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration and how they are connected. Roeper Review, 31(2), 81–95. Doi: 10.1080/02783190902737657
Bailey, C. (2010). Overexcitabilities and Sensitivities: Implications of Dabrowski’s Theory of Positive Disintegration for Counseling the Gifted. Counselingoutfitters.Com, January 2010. http://www.counselingoutfitters.com/vistas/vistas10/Article_10.pdf
Bouchet, N., & Falk, R. F. (2001). Relationship Among Giftedness , Gender, and Overexcitability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(4), 260–267. Doi: 10.1177/001698620104500404
Dabrowski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston: Little, Brown.
Dabrowski, K. (1972). Psychoneurosis is not an ilness: neuroses and psychoneuroses from the perspective of positive disintegration. Gryf Publications.
Falk, R. F., Lind, S.K., Miller, N. B., Piechowski, M. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1999). The Overexcitabilities Questionnaire-Two (OEQII): Manual, Scoring System, and Questionnaire. 1–8. www.gifteddevelopment.com
Falk, F., Piechowski, M. M., & Lind, S. L. (1994). Criteria for rating the intensity of overexcitabilities. In University of Akron. http://positivedisintegration.com/FalkPie1984.pdf
Fonseca, C. (2011). Emotional Intensity in Gifted Students: Helping Kids Cope With Explosive Feelings. Prufrock Press Inc.
Gagné, F. (1995). From giftedness to talent: A developmental model and its impact on the language of the field. Roeper Review, 18(2), 103–111. Doi: 10.1080/02783199509553709
Gallagher, S. A. (1985). A comparison of the concept of overexcitabilities with measures of creativity and school achievement in sixth-grade students. Roeper Review, 8(2), 115–119. Doi: 10.1080/02783198509552950
Kosasih, I., & Suralaga, F. (2020). Pengaruh kecerdasan dan kreativitas terhadap overexcitability. Tazkiya: Journal of Psychology, 8(2), 155-165.
Kurcinka, M. S. (2006). Raising Your Spirited Child: A Guide for Parents Whose Child is More Intense, Sensitive, Perceptive, Persistent, and Energetic (Revised Ed). Harper.
Marland, Jr., S. P. (1971). Education of the Gifted and Talented - Volume 1: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. Encyclopedia of Special Education, 1–126. Doi: 10.1002/9781118660584.ese1487
Miller, N. B., Silverman, L. K., & Falk, R. F. (1994). Emotional Development, Intellectual Ability, and Gender. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18(1), 20–38. Doi: 10.1177/016235329401800103
Mika, E. (2002). Pattern of overexcitabilities in gifted children. In N. Duda (Ed.), The Fifth International Conference of the Theory of Positive Disintegration. Fort Laurdeldale, FL.
Piechowski, M. M. (1979). Developmental potential. In N. Colangelo & R. T. Zaffrann (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 25–57). Kendall/Hunt.
Piechowski, M. M. (2002). Experiencing in a Higher Key Dabrowski’s Theory of and for the Gifted. Gifted Education Communicator, 28–36.
Piechowski, M. M. (2009). The Inner World of the Young and Bright. Morality, Ethics, and Gifted Minds, 177–194. Doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-89368-6_14
Piechowski, M., & Colangelo, N. (1984). Developmental potential of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 80-88.
Piechowski, M.M. & Wells, C. (2021). Reexamining overexcitability: A frame work for understanding intense experience. Handbook For Counselors Serving Students with Gifts and Talents (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Piirto, J., & Fraas, J. (2012). A mixed-methods comparison of vocational and identified-gifted high school students on the overexcitability questionnaire. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(1), 3–34. Doi: 10.1177/0162353211433792
Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftednesss: A developmental model for creative productivity." In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.). In Cambridge University Press.
Silverman, L. K. (2005). Inside-Out: Understanding the Social and Emotional Needs of Gifted Children The Institute for the Study of Advanced Development. www.gifteddevelopment.com;
Siu, A. F. Y. (2010). Comparing overexcitabilities of gifted and non-gifted school children in Hong Kong: Does culture make a difference? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30(1), 71–83. Doi: 10.1080/02188790903503601
Tieso, C. L. (2007). Overexcitabilities: A new way to think about talent? Roeper Review, 29(4), 232–239. Doi: 10.1080/02783190709554417
Tieso, C.L. (2007). Patterns of overexcitabilities in identified giftedstudents and their parents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(1), 11-22.
Tillier, W. (2002). A Brief Overview of the Relevance of Dabrowski’s Theory for the Gifted. Journal of Gifted and Talented Education Council of The Alberta Teachers’ Association, 15(2).
Van den Broeck, W., Hofmans, J., Cooremans, S., & Staels, E. (2014). Factorial validity and measurement invariance across intelligence levels and gender of the overexcitabilities questionnaire-II (OEQ-II). Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 55–68. Doi: 10.1037/a0034475
Winkler, D., & Voight, A. (2016). Giftedness and Overexcitability: Investigating the Relationship Using Meta-Analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(4), 243–257. Doi: 10.1177/0016986216657588
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.