Adaptasi Instrumen The Resiliency Scale for Young Adults Versi Bahasa Indonesia pada Populasi Emerging Adulthood
(1) Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Padjadjaran
(2) Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Padjadjaran
(3) Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Padjadjaran
Abstract
Remaja menghadapi banyak tantangan selama masa transisi menuju dewasa. Dibutuhkan ketahanan diri atau resiliensi untuk membantu remaja berkembang terlepas dari kesulitan yang dihadapi. Untuk mengetahui bagaimana dewasa awal mengembangkan kemampuan resiliensi, dibutuhkan instrumen yang valid dan reliabel. Oleh karena itu penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji validitas konstruk dari skala The Resiliency Scale for Young Adults (RSYA). Data yang digunakan diperoleh dari 279 populasi dewasa awal usia 18─25 tahun dengan mayoritas berjenis kelamin perempuan dan rata-rata usia 21 tahun. Partisipan umumnya berlatar belakang pendidikan minimal SMA/SMK sehingga sebagian besarnya saat ini adalah mahasiswa dengan rata-rata pengeluaran per bulan kurang dari Rp1.000.000. Asal daerah partisipan beragam dari seluruh Indonesia, dengan lebih dari setengahnya berasal dari Provinsi Jawa Barat. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Hasil pengujian membuktikan model RSYA memenuhi kriteria fit dan terbukti reliabel (α = 0,931) dengan indeks kesesuaian RMSEA = 0.079, Standardized RMR = 0.078, CFI = 0.91, dan IFI = 0.91. Validitas konvergen-diskriminan diuji menggunakan instrumen DASS (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale) dan SWLS (Satisfaction with Life Scale) dengan hasil dua faktor protektif (sense of mastery dan sense of relatedness) berkorelasi negatif dengan DASS dan positif dengan SWLS. Sebaliknya, faktor risiko (emotional reactivity) berkorelasi positif dengan DASS dan negatif dengan SWLS. Studi ini menunjukkan RSYA versi bahasa Indonesia valid dan dapat diandalkan untuk mengukur resiliensi pada populasi awal di Indonesia.
Adolescents face many challenges during the transition to adulthood. It takes personal resiliency to help adolescents thrive despite the difficulties they faced. To find out how early adults developed resilience capabilities, a valid and reliable measuring instrument is needed. Therefore, this study aims to test the construct validity of The Resiliency Scale for Young Adults (RSYA). The data was obtained from 279 early adult population aged 18 ─ 25 years with the majority being female, with an average age of 21 years. Participants generally have a minimum high school/vocational education background, therefore, most of them are currently college students with an average monthly expenditure of less than Rp1,000,000. Regional origins of participants vary from all over Indonesia, with more than half coming from West Java Province. The analysis method used was Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The test results proved that the RSYA model met the fit criteria and was proven to be reliable (α = 0.931) with a conformity index of RMSEA=0.079, Standardized RMR=0.078, CFI=0.91, and IFI=0.91. The convergent-discriminants validity was tested using DASS (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale) and SWLS (Satisfaction with Life Scale) instruments with the results that two protective factors (sense of mastery and sense of relatedness) correlated negatively with DASS and positively with SWLS. In contrast, risk factors (emotional reactivity) correlate positively with DASS and negatively with SWLS. This study shows Indonesian version of RSYA is valid and reliable for measuring resilience in early populations in Indonesia.
Keywords
References
Akhtar, H. (2019). Evaluasi properti psikometris dan perbandingan model pengukuran konstruk subjective well-being. Jurnal Psikologi, 18(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.18.1.29-40
Anggorowati, Y., Jubaedah, E., & Susanto, S. (2019). Implikasi kualitas pelayanan dan produk di badan pusat statistik provinsi jawa barat. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 16(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v16i1.204
Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (4th ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Barlett, C. P., Barlett, N. D., & Chalk, H. M. C. (2020). Transitioning through emerging adulthood and physical health implications. Emerging Adulthood, 8(4), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696818814642
Block, J. H., & Kremen, A. M. (1996). IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 349–361.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new Resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113
Gliem, J., & Gliem, R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for linkert-type scales. Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing and Community Education, 82–88. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/bitstream/handle/1805/344/Gliem+&+Gliem.pdf?sequence=1.
Goodwin, C. J. (2017). Research in psychology: methods and design. New York: Wiley.
Gregory, R. J. (2007). Psychology testing: History, principles, and applications (5th ed.). Boston: Ally & Bacon.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th editio). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
Hubley, A. M., & Zumbo, B. D. (1996). A dialectic on validity: Where we have been and where we are going. The Journal of General Psychology, 123(3), 207–21.
Hubley, A. M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2013). Psychometric characteristics of assessment procedures: An overview. In APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
ITC. (2017). International test commission guidelines for translating and adapting tests (second edition). Retrieved from www.InTestCom.org
Kaligis, F., Ismail, R. I., Wiguna, T., Prasetyo, S., Indriatmi, W., Gunardi, H., … Magdalena, C. C. (2021). Mental health problems and needs among transitional-age youth in Indonesia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084046
Kobau, R., Sniezek, J., Zack, M. M., Lucas, R. E., & Burns, A. (2010). Well-being assessment: An evaluation of well-being scales for public health and population estimates of well-being among US adults. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2(3), 272–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01035.x
Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21, DASS-42). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/t01004-000
MacLeod, K. B., & Brownlie, E. (2014). Mental health and transitions from adolescence to emerging adulthood: developmental and diversity considerations. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 33(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.7870/cjcmh-2014-007
Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227
Masten, A. S. (2014). Ordinary Magic: Resilience in Development. New York: The Guilford Press.
Oei, T. P. S., Sawang, S., Goh, Y. W., & Mukhtar, F. (2013). Using the depression anxiety stress scale 21 (DASS-21) across cultures. International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 48, pp. 1018–1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.755535
Plouffe, R. A., Dave, H. P., Wilson, C. A., Topa, G., Riggin, A., Lau, C., … Prince-Embury, S. (2020). Validity and cross-cultural invariance of the Resiliency Scale for Young Adults—Spanish version. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(5), 918–922. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000563
Prince-Embury, S. (2014). A three-factor model of personal resilience and related interventions. In S. Prince-Embury & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), Resilience interventions for youth in diverse populations (pp. 25–27). New York: Springer.
Prince-Embury, S., Saklofske, D. H., & Nordstokke, D. W. (2016). The resiliency scale for young adults. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(3), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916641866
Scheaffer, R. L., Mendenhall, W., Ott, R. L., & Gerow, K. G. (2011). Elementary survey sampling (7th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, J., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008). The Brief Resilience Scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 194–200.
Wilson, C. A., Plouffe, R. A., Saklofske, D. H., Di Fabio, A., Prince-Embury, S., & Babcock, S. E. (2017). Resiliency across cultures: a validation of the resiliency scale for young adults. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282917740017
Wilson, C. A., Plouffe, R. A., Saklofske, D. H., Yan, G., Nordstokke, D. W., Prince-Embury, S., & Gao, Y. (2018). A cross-cultural validation of the resiliency scale for young adults in Canada and China. PsyCh Journal, 8(2), 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.256
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.