PENGARUH KEADILAN PROSEDURAL DAN KEADILAN DISTRIBUTIF TERHADAP KOMITMEN ORGANISASI DI PT. SAI APPAREL INDUSTRIES SEMARANG
(1) Bagian Sumber Daya Manusia, Badan Perkreditan Rakyat MAA Ungaran, Kabupaten Semarang, Jawa Tengah
Abstract
Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi bahwa jumlah turnover karyawan pada tahun 2011-2015 mengalami siklus turnover yang cukup tinggi pada staf karyawan, peneliti berasumsi karyawan PT. SAI Apparel Industries Semarang memiliki komitmen organisasi rendah. Faktor yang dapat mempengaruhi komitmen organisasi adalah karakteristik kerja dan karakteristik organisasi yaitu terkait keadilan organisasi. Keadilan yang dimaksudkan adalah keadilan prosedural dan keadilan distributif yang disebutkan bahwa keadilan tersebut kurang dirasakan oleh karyawan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah ada pengaruh keadilan prosedural dan keadilan distributif terhadap komitmen organisasi di PT. SAI Apparel Industries Semarang. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif korelasional dengan melibatkan sampel sebanyak 128 staf karyawan di PT. SAI Apparel Industries Semarang. Probability sampling dipilih untuk menentukan sampel. Pengambilan data penelitian ini menggunakan tiga skala yaitu komitmen organisasi dengan koefisien validitas antara 0,308-0,690 dan koefisien reliabilitas sebesar 0,860, keadilan prosedural memiliki keofisien validitas antara 0,223-0,728 dan koefisien reliabilitas sebesar 0,808, dan keadilan distributif memiliki koefisien validitas antara 0,309-0,699 dan koefisien reliabilitas sebesar 0,763. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah teknik analisis regresi berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan komitmen organisasi, keadilan prosedural, dan keadilan distributif berada pada kriteria sedang. Hasil lain adalah ada pengaruh positif keadilan prosedural terhadap komitmen organisasi (nilai T = 7,312, p = 0,000), tidak ada pengaruh keadilan distributif terhadap komitmen organisasi (nilai T = 0,522, p = 0,603), dan ada pengaruh positif keadilan prosedural dan keadilan distributif terhadap komitmen organisasi (nilai F = 51,755 dengan p = 0,000).
Abstract.
This research is motivated that employee turnover rateis quite high from 2011-2015 the researcher assumes that the staff and employees of PT. SAI Apparel Industries Semarang have a low organizational commitment. Factors affecting organizational commitment are work characteristics and organizational characteristics, i.e. organizational justice. Justice means that procedural justice and distributive justice are not perceived by employees. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is influence of procedural justice and distributive justice on organizational commitment in PT. SAI Apparel Industries Semarang. This was a quantitative correlational study involving 128 staff and employees of PT. SAI Apparel Industries Semarang as the sample. Probability sampling was chosen to determine the sample. Data collection method used three scales, i.e. organizational commitment with validity coefficient of 0.308-0.690 and reliability coefficient of 0.860, procedural justice with validity coefficient of 0.223 - 0.728 and reliability coefficient of 0.808, and distributive justice with validity coefficient of 0.309 - 0.699 and reliability coefficient of 0.763. Data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis technique. The results showed that organizational commitment, procedural justice, and distributive justice were in the medium criteria. Then, the other results showed that there was a positive effect of procedural justice on organizational commitment (T = 7.312, p = 0.000), there was no effect of distributive justice on organizational commitment (T = 0.522, p = 0.603), and there was a positive effect of procedural justice and distributive justice on organizational commitment (F = 51.755, p = 0.000).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abrivianto, P. O. dkk. 2014. Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasional terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Studi pada karyawan bagian HRD PT. Arthawena Sakti Gemilang Malang). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis. Vol. 7, No. 2, Page 1-9
Al-Zu‟bi, H. A. 2010. A Study of
Relationship between Organizational Justice and Job Satisfaction.
International Journal of Bisnis and Management. Vol. 5, No. 12, Page 102-109
As‟ad, M. 2004. Seri Ilmu Sumber Daya Manusia: Psikologi Industri. Edisi ke
Empat. Yogyakarta : Liberty Yogyakarta
Baron, R. A. & Byrne, D. 2005. Psikologi
Sosil Jilid 2. Jakarta: Erlangga
Buhali, G. A. & Margaretha, M. 2013. Pengaruh Work-Family Conflict terhadap Komitmen Organisasi: Kepuasan Kerja sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Jurnal Manajemen. Vol. 13, No. 1, Page 15-34
Colquitt, J. A. 2001. On The Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 86, No. 3, Page 386-400
Cropanzano, R., et al. 2003. The Relationship of Emotional Exhaustion to Work Attitudes, Job Performance, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors.
Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol.
, No. 1 Page 160-169
Faturochman. 2012. Keadilan Perspektif Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Unit Publikasi Fakultas Psikologi UGM dengan Pustaka Pelajar
Gibson, J. L., et al. 2012. Organizations Behavior, Structure, Processes. New York: McGraw Hill
Kristanto, S. 2013. Pengaruh Keadilan Organisasional terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dan Dampaknya terhadap Komitmen dan Intensitas Keluar di PT Indonesia Power UBP Bali. Tesis Managemen. 1-105
Luthans, F. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi. Yogyakarta: Andi
Mowday, R. T., et al. 1979. The Measurement of Organizational Commitment.
Journal of Vocational Behavior. 14,
Page 224-247
Nasurdin, A. M. & Ahmad, Z. A. 2001. The Effect of Procedural Justice on Organizational Commitment in the Malaysian Context: Do Men and Women Differ?. Asian Academy of Management Journal. 6 (1): 31-47
Newstrom, J. W. 2007. Organizational
Behavior. New York: McGraw Hill
Pratiwi, R. D. 2014. Komitmen Organisasi
Ditinjau dari Kualitas Kehidupan
Kerja dan Komunikasi Bawahan
kepada Atasan. Skripi Psikologi. Page
- 114
Robbins, S. P. & Judge, T. A. 2009. Perilaku
Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
Searle, M. S. 1990. Social Exchange Theory
as a Framework for Understanding
Ceasing Partisipation in Organized Leisure Activities. Ontario Research Council on Leisure. Page 1-5
Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian
Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D.
Bandung: Alfabeta
Zafirovski, M. 2005. Social Exchange Theory
under Scrutiny: A Positive Critique of
its Economic-Behaviorist
Formulations. Electronic Journal of
Sociology. Page 1-40
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.