The Arts Learning Model of BPK2 (Creative Work Practice Learning) Activities

Warih Handayaningrum(1), Djoko Tutuko(2), Agus Suwahyono(3),


(1) Department of Arts, Drama, Dance and Music, Faculty Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
(2) Department of Arts, Drama, Dance and Music, Faculty Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
(3) Department of Arts, Drama, Dance and Music, Faculty Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia

Abstract

The study program of Drama, Dance and Music Arts (Sendratasik) of FBS Unesa often gets visits from various schools in the city of Surabaya and surrounding areas for specific purposes, one of which is SMA Negeri 6. SMAN 6 Surabaya is one of the schools that organizes Creative Work Practice Learning (BPK2) at Sendratasik FBS Unesa. So that the implementation of BPK2 activities runs optimally, an appropriate learning model is needed. The purpose of this study is to describe the art learning model in BPK2 activities at SMA Negeri 6 Surabaya in Sendratasik FBS Unesa. The Qualitative approach was used in this study, the subjects are 306 students of SMA Negeri 6 Surabaya, 20 lecturers, and 20 students of FBS Unesa. The object of research, art learning models in Creative Work Practices Learning Activities (BPK2). Location in Sendratasik FBS Unesa. Data collection techniques: observation, interviews, documentation Data analysis is done during data collection, interactive with flexible techniques. Research results: Learning art with BPK2 activities use a humanistic approach that is optimizing the potential and interest of students in art. Art learning material includes appreciation and creation. Project-based models and apretensive models are used to produce works until they are performed. Staging learning outcomes as projects that must be completed by students are carried out well until BPK2 activities become meaningful learning because the benefits continue to be felt when returning to school. This research is important to encourage freedom of learning, so that art education according to its function gives rise to student creativity.

Keywords

art learning package, learning creative work practices, art learning model, free learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Basuki,I, H. (2014). Assesmen Pembelajaran. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Denzin, N. K. & Y. S. L. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Pustaka Pelajar.

Eggen, P. & Kaushik, D. (2004). Educational Psychology. Prior.

Firdaus, F. A. (2017). Humanistic Approach In Education According to Paulo Freire. At-Ta’dib, 12(2). https://doi.org/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v12i2.1264

Masunah, J. (2003). Angklung di Jawa Barat Sebuah Perbandingan. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Mudjiati. (2014). Keunggulan dan kelemahan Kurikulum 2013 Mata Pelajaran Seni Budaya bidang Seni Rupa.

Nurgiyantoro, B. (2008). Penilaian Autentik. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 27(3), 250-261.

Pamadhi, H. (2012a). Pendidikan Seni Hakekat Kurikulum Pendidikan Seni Habitus Seni dan pengajaran seni untuk Anak. UNY Press.

Pamadhi, H. (2012b). Pendidikan Seni Hakekat Kurikulum Pendidikan Seni Habitus Seni dan pengajaran seni untuk Anak. UNY Press.

Sani, R. A. (2016). Inovasi Pembelajaran. Bumi Aksara.

Slameto, S. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Rineka Cipta.

Soehardjo, A. . (2011). Pendidikan Seni. P3T Ikip Malang.

Sukmadinata, Syaodih, N. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sutedja, W. (2007). Panduan Layanan Konsumen. PT. Grasindo, Anggota IKAPI.

Tim LP3M. (2017). Buku Pedoman Program Pengelolaan Pembelajaran. Unesa.

Trianto. (2007). Model-model pembelajaran Inovatif berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Prestasi Pustaka.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.