Holistic Academic Supervision Model for Cultural Art Teachers of Vocational High Schools
(1) Cultural Art Teacher of Vocational High School Pringapus Ungaran, Indonesia
(2) Postgraduate Lecturer of Semarang State University, Indonesia
Abstract
This study is aiming at (1) describing and analyzing the current implementation of academic supervision (factual model), (2) generating and analyzing academic supervision model as needed (hypothetical model), and (3) identifying and analyzing the effectiveness of a holistic model of academic supervision (the final model). The method employed in this research was the Research and Development (R&D) method, which was divided into three phases: a preliminary study, stage of development and evaluation stages. The data sources were the school superintendents, teachers, as well as students. Further, the data were collected by conducting interviews, questionnaires, and observations. Results showed that the current implementation of academic supervision was considered less effective. The academic supervision which is considered as appropriate for cultural art teachers is a holistic academic supervision. It involves school superintendents and cultural art teachers who are supervised, starting from the planning stage up to the follow-up stage, so that, a good relationship between them will be established. It is concluded in this study that a holistic academic supervision model is effective to enhance the professional competence of cultural art teachers.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ali, Muhammad. (2002). Guru dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar BaruAlgensindo
Afolakemi, O. & David, O. (2007). Supervision and Quality of Teaching Personnel Effects on Students’ Academic Performance. Educational Research and Review Vol. 2 (3). pp. 032-035.
Ambarwangi, S. (2013) . Pendidikan Multikultural di Sekolah melalui Pendidikan Seni Tradisi. Harmonia Journal of Arts Research and Education, 13 (1), 78-85.
Ambarwangi, S. (2014). Reog as Means of Students’ Appreciation and Creation in Arts and Culture on The Local Wisdom. Harmonia Journal of Arts Research and Education, 14 (1), 37-45.
Arifah, Neny. (2006). Pengembangan Supervisi Klinis untuk meningkatkan keterampilan dasar mengajar guru. Tesis. Surabaya : Pascasarjana Universitas Surabaya.
Behlol, M. G. (2011). Concept of Supervision and Supervisory Practices at Primary Level in Pakistan. International Education Studies, 4 (4), 28-35.
Borg & Gall (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction, Fifth Edition. New York: Longman
Burhanudin. (2005). Administrasi Pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Second Edition). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Depdikbud. (2012). Pedoman Penilaian Kinerja Pengawas Sekolah Muda/Madya/ Utama. Jakarta: Depdikbud P2TK.
Kompas.com. (2012, August 1). PGRI tak Percaya Hasil Tes UKG. Retrieved from Kompas.com http:edukasi.compas.co.Desember 10, 2014.
Glickman, C. D. (1995). Supervision of Instruction. Boston : Allyn and Bacon Inc.
Glickman, C. D., Gordon, J. M. (1995). Supervision of Instruction: A developmental approach (3 rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Hasibuan, M. (2003). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Jaffer, K. (2010). School Inspection and Supervision in Pakistan: Approaches and Issues. Prospect. 40 (3), 375-392.
Kun, S. A. (2010). Pengembangan Model Evaluasi Pembelajaran Seni Budaya SMP. Jurnal Kependidikan, 40 (1) 87-98.
Kurniawan, A. (2005). Transformasi Pelayanan Publik.Yogyakarta: Pembaharuan.
Lazaruht, S. (1988). Kepala Sekolah dan Tanggung Jawabnya. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Kamaril, Cut. (2001). Konsep Pendidikan Seni Tingkat SD-SLTP-SMU. Paper presented on Seminar dan Lokakarya Nasional Pendidikan Seni on 18-20 April 2001. Jakarta.
Mukhtar & Iskandar. (2009). Orientasi Baru Supervisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Gaung
Mulyasa. (2007). Standar Kompetensi Sertifikasi Guru. Bandung: Remaja Rosda karya.
Depdikbud. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No.12 tahun 2007 tentang Standar Pengawas Sekolah/Madrasah. Jakarta: Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Depdikbud. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah No.19 tahun 2005 tentang Standar Pengelolaan. Jakarta: Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Purwanto, Ngalim. (2003). Administrasi dan supervisi pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja: Rosdakarya
Rusman. (2009). Manajemen Kurikulum. Jakarta: Raja grafindo Persada.
Sahertian, Piet A. (2008). Konsep Dasar dan Teknik Supervisi Pendidikan Dalam Rangka Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Samsudi. (2009). Desain Penelitian Pendidikan. Semarang : Unnes Press.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: ALFABETA
Sutopo, Hendiyat. (2002). Kepemimmpinan dan Supervisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Sukidin, B., Suranto. (2008). Manejemen Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Insan Cendiki.
Sudjana, Nana. (2012). Supervisi Pendidikan Konsep dan Aplikasinya Bagi Pengawas Sekolah. Bekasi : Binamitra Publishing.
Suharto, S. (2011). PENGEMBANGAN MATERI DAN KEGIATAN PEMBELAJARANNYA DALAM KURIKULUM TINGKAT SATUAN PENDIDIKAN BIDANG SENI MUSIK. Harmonia: Journal Of Arts Research And Education, 8(3). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/harmonia.v8i3.780
Suharto, S. (2013). PROBLEMATIKA PELAKSANAAN PENDIDIKAN SENI MUSIK DI SEKOLAH KEJURUAN NON SENI. Harmonia: Journal Of Arts Research And Education, 12(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/harmonia.v12i1.2221
Supriyono. (2011). Pengaruh Sistem Supervisi Akademik Pengawas Sekolah Terhadap Profesional Guru SMA Negeri 1 Padang Ratu Lampung Tengah. Thesis. Lampung: Post Graduate Program, UNNES.
Widodo, J. (2007). Supervisi Guru Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi di Indonesia : antara teori dan realita”. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi. 2 (2), 291-313.
Zepeda, S.J., & Ponticell, J. A. (1998). At Cross-Purpose: what do Teacher Need, Want, and get from Supervision? Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 14 (1), 68-87.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.