An Analysis of Spatial Construction in Pictorial Art from the Perspective of Formalism

Hanping Feng(1), Safrizal Shahir(2),


(1) Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia
(2) Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia

Abstract

“Space,” as a fundamental conceptual term, has been frequently and widely applied within various disciplines, such as sociology, architecture, philosophy, math, art, and so forth. In pictorial art, the term “space” is often used as a lens to understand specific concepts or artworks. This study aims to explain and describe pictorial spatial construction in paintings by applying various approaches. However, in the field of formalist analysis over the past century, except for a few formalist critics who have engaged with pictorial space, few have attempted to use creative methodologies to systematically analyze how pictorial space is constructed in the painting, particularly in works by contemporary painters. Therefore, to fill in this lacuna in the research, this study utilizes new formal analytical methods to analyze and explain spatial construction in paintings. In terms of the method of analysis, this study analyzes a sample of Western contemporary paintings and utilizes the approaches of the overlap of the abstract and the figurative, parallel narratives existing in multiple spaces, and the juxtaposition of different material dimensions, respectively, to rethink the method of spatial construction in the painting. The result concludes that paintings are an essential research object within visual art. The construction of image space is rich and includes multiple layers of meaning. The overlapping of abstract space (sensibility) and figurative space (rationality), as well as the coexistence of this contradictory system, enables artists to discover more possibilities when creating works and effectively enrich visual effects and textures in their paintings.

Keywords

spatial construction; pictorial art; perspective of formalism; formal analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aguirre, P., Azimi, N., & Cashdan, M. (2011). Vitamin P2: New perspectives in painting. Phaidon Press.

Buck-Morss, S. (2002). Dreamworld, and catastrophe: The passing of mass utopia in East and West. The MIT Press.

Crawford, D. W. (1974). Kant’s aesthetic theory. University of Wisconsin Press.

Curtin, D. W. (1982). Varieties of Aesthetic Formalism. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 40(3), 315-326.

Dunning, W. V. (1991). Changing images of pictorial space: A history of spatial illusion in painting [Reprint]. Syracuse University Press.

Dziemidok, B. (1993). Artistic formalism: Its achievements and weaknesses. The journal of aesthetics and art criticism, 51(2), 185-193.

Ekman, R. (1970). The paradoxes of formalism. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 10(4), 350-358.

Freud, S., & James, C. (2008). The interpretation of the dream (1st ed). Oxford University Press.

Fry, R. (2018). Cézanne: A Study of his development. Muriwai Books.

Francis, F., & Charles, H. (1982). Modern art and modernism: A critical anthology. Routledge.

Gale, M., & Stephens, C. (2008). Francis Bacon (1st ed). Tate Publishing.

Greenberg, C. (1983). Modern art, and modernism (1st ed). Routledge.

Gombrich, E. H. (1995). Story of art. Phaidon Press.

Kobe, M., & Rappolt, M. (2007). Behind true symmetry. White cube.

Lindsay, K. C., & Vergo, P. (Eds.). (1982). Kandinsky: Complete writings on art (2nd ed). Faber & Faber Limited.

Obrist, H. U. (Ed.). (1995). Gerhard Richter: The daily practice of painting, writings 1962–1993. Anthony d’Offay Gallery.

Panofsky, E. (1997). Perspective as symbolic form. Urzone, Inc.

Parsons, G. (2004). Moderate Formalism as a Theory of the Aesthetic. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 38(3), 19-35.

Pinotti, A. (2012). Formalism and the History of Style. In Art history and visual studies in Europe (pp. 75-90). Brill.

Read, H. E. (Ed.). (1936). Surrealism (1st ed) (pp. 1893–1968). Faber & Faber Limited.

Read, H. E. (1965). Concise history of modern painting (2nd ed). Thames & Hudson Ltd.

Rohdie, S. (2006). Montage (cinema aesthetics) (1st ed). Manchester University Press.

Small, J. P. (1999). Time in space: Narrative in classical art. Art Bulletin, 81(4), 562–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043079.1999.10786904

Thomson-Jones, K. (2005). Inseparable insight: Reconciling cognitivism and formalism in aesthetics. The journal of aesthetics and art criticism, 63(4), 375-384.

Schreyach, M. (2013). Barnett Newman’s “sense of space”: A noncontextualist account of its perception and meaning. Common Knowledge, 19(2), 351–379. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-2073367

Schreyach, M. (2013). Barnett Newman’s “sense of space”: A noncontextualist account of its perception and meaning. Common Knowledge, 19(2), 351–379. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-2073367

Walker, J. (1992). Glossary of art, architecture and design since 1945 (3rd ed). Macmillan Reference.

Worringer, W. (1997). Abstraction and empathy: A contribution to the psychology of style. Ivan R. Dee.

Yan, C. (2005). Chinese brush painting. Search Press Ltd.

Zangwill, N. (2001). The metaphysics of beauty. Cornell University Press.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.