Analysis of Corruption Settlement for Obligor Deviations of Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance (BLBI)

Hasbullah Hasbullah

Abstract

The settlement of the BLBI Corruption Case was only focused on the mistakes of former IBRA Chairperson Syafruddin Arsyad Temenggung who issued paid settlement letter to Sjamsul Nursalim as a BLBI obligor which caused 4.58 trillion in financial losses, even though the SKL issuance contained legal slices of the state administration process and civil affairs. The corruption case of the former Chairperson of the IBRA has diverted us all to the main point of corruption errors in the BLBI distribution. Distribution of the Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance Facility (BLBI) with a total of 144.53 trillion, from the distribution recorded based on BPK-RI Audit No. 34 I / XII / 11/2006, there was a distribution deviation amounting to 138.44 trillion, but the BPK audit by law enforcement has never been carried out until now. Therefore the problem is focused on two main things, namely whether the settlement of the BLBI Corruption crime in the case of the IBRA chairman issuing SKL to Sjamsul Nursalim has resolved the BLBI corruption case and how the law enforcement policy in BLBI corruption settlement has cost the state 138,44 trillion . Using a normative juridical method that is qualitative in nature, the research results show that the settlement of BLBI corruption in the case of the IBRA chairman issuing SKL to Sjamsul Nursalim is not the case for BLBI irregularities and even in the legal doctrine of the case is not a corruption case due to a legal clash state administration and civil law. and there has been a transfer of corruption eradication in the case of BLBI distribution which has cost the country a total of 138.44 trillion, because law enforcers must enforce the law against alleged BLBI corruption with criminal mechanisms and if possible civilian efforts.

Keywords

Corruption, State Losses, BLBI Distribution, Chairperson of IBRA

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adji, I. S. (2002). Korupsi dan Hukum Pidana, Kantor Pengacara & Konsultan Hukum. Jakarta: Prof Oemar Seno Adji & Rekan.

Ali, M. (2011). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Miru, A. & Yodo, S. (2004). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Bandung: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Beritasatu (2018) “Sidang BLBI saksi ahli perkara Syafruddin Temenggung tak masuk akalâ€, Online, retrieved from https://sp.beritasatu.com/home/sidang-blbi-saksi-ahli-perkara-syafruddin-temenggung-tak-masuk-akal/125568, accessed on 25-03-2019, 06.17. WIB

BPK RI. Hasil Pemeriksaan Penyaluran, Penggunaan dan Penyelesaian Bantuan Likuiditas Bank Indonesia, Dalam rangka pemeriksaan atas laporan pelaksanaan tugas BPPN No 341/XII/II/2006 tanggal 30 November 2006.

Chazawi, A. (2016). Hukum Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Dennis, Ian. (2007). The Law Evidence, Edisi ke-3. London: Sweet and Maxwell.

Djaja, E. (2010). Memberantas Korupsi Bersama KPK (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hamdan, H.M. (2012) Alasan Penghapus Pidana, Teori dan Studi Kasus, Refika Aditama: Bandung.

Hiariej, Eddy O.S. (2014). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

JPPN (2018). “Misrepresentasi harus dibuktikan lewat putusan pengadilamâ€, Online, retrieved from “https://www.jpnn.com/kementan/news/misrepresentasi-harus-dibuktikan-lewat-putusan-pengadilan, accessed on 25-03-2019, 06.17. WIB

Keppres 177 of 1999, Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 177 Tahun 1999 Tentang Komite Kebijakan Sektor Keuangan.

Kristian & Gunawan, Y. (2015). Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Kajian terhadap Harmonisasi antara Hukum Nasional dan United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), Cetakan Kesatu. Bandung, PT Refika Aditama.

Marzuki, P.M. (2008). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Merdeka (2018) “Apa kabar koruptor dana BLBIâ€, Online, retrieved from https://www.merdeka.com/uang/apa-kabar-koruptor-dana-blbi.html, accessed on 25-03-2019, 06.17. WIB

Merdeka (2018) “Pengamat imbau kesalahan penerbitan SKL terhadap BLBI harus diuji PTUNâ€, Online, retrieved from https://www.merdeka.com/uang/pengamat-imbau-kesalahan-penerbitan-skl-terhadap-blbi-harus-diuji-ptun.html, accessed on 25-03-2019, 06.17. WIB

Moeljatno. (2002). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Ketujuh. Jakarta. PT. Rineka Cipta.

__________. (1995). “Perbuatan Pidana Dan Pertanggungan Jawab Dalam Hukum Pidanaâ€. Pidato diucapkan pada upacara peringatan Dies Natalis ke VI Universitas Gadjah Mada, di Sitihinggil Yogyakarta pada tanggal 19 Desember 1955

__________. (2009). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Noor, H.J. (2018). “Kerugian Keuangan Negara dalam Pengelolaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara Berbentuk Perseroan Terbatas dalam Perspektif Hukum Bisnis dan Tindak Pidana Korupsiâ€. Disertasi. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 17 Tahun 1999 Tentang Badan Penyehatan Perbankan Nasional.

PN Jakarta Pusat (2018). Putusan PN Jakarta Pusat No.39/PID.SUS/TPK/2018/PN.JKT.PST Jo. Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi DKI Jakarta No. 29/PID.SUS-TPK/2018/PT.DKI

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi 003/PUU-IV/2006

Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2006). Hukum dalam Jagat Ketertiban. Jakarta. UKI Press.

Remmelink, Jan. (2003). Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Simons, D. (1937). Weertboek Van Het Nederlandsche Strafrecht, Eerste Deel, Zesde Druk. Groningen – Batavia: P. Noordhoof N.V.

Suringa, Hazewinkel. (1953). Inleiding Tot De Studie Van Het Nederlandse Strafrecht. Haarlem: H.D. Tjeenk Willink & Zoon N.V.

Sapardjaja, Komariah Emong. (2002). Ajaran Melawan Hukum Materiil dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Studi Kasus tentang Penerapan dan Perkembangannya dalam Yurisprudensi, Bandung: Alumni.

Sianturi, S.R. (1986). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya, Alumni Romli Atmsasmita dan Kodrat.

Subekti. (1987). Pokok-pokok Hukum Perikatan. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Sudarto. (1990). Hukum Pidana I. Semarang: Yayasan Sudarto Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.

Susetyo, Benny. (2003). “Ilusi Pemberantasan Korupsiâ€. KOMPAS, 14 November 2003.

Triffterer, O. (1999). Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

Utrecht. (1960). Hukum Pidana I. Bandung: Penerbitan Universitas.

Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1986 jo. Pasal 1 angka 8 Undang-undang No 51 Tahun 2009.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 1999 Tentang Bank Indonesia

Vos, H.B. (1950). Weetboek Van Nederlands Strafrecht, Derde Herziene Druk. Haarlem: H.D. Tjeenk Willink & Zoon N.V.

Wibowo. (2016). Analisis Ekonomi Mikro Tentang Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Kharisma Putra Utama.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v4i1.18713

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.