Evolution of Corporate Criminal Liability Models and Theories under Indonesian New Criminal Code

Muhammad Wahyu Alfakar, Ali Masyhar Mursyid, Cahya Wulandari, Ngboawaji Daniel Nte

Abstract

Corporate crime, also known as white-collar crime, has persisted in Indonesia for decades, evolving alongside the country's economic and industrial growth. Various models and theories have emerged to address these issues, reflecting a growing recognition of the need for robust legal frameworks to combat corporate misconduct. Normative legal research methods have been employed in this study, focusing specifically on the criminal law aspects related to the development of corporate criminal liability theories and concepts under Law Number 1 of 2023. Law Number 1 of 2023 introduces the corporation as a maker and also a responsible corporation model of corporate criminal liability, recognizing corporations as legal entities capable of being held accountable for their actions. This statutory framework represents a significant advancement, reinforcing Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016. The research explores various perspectives on corporate responsibility models and theories, offering ideal solutions for their application and development within Indonesia's legal framework. This evolution signifies Indonesia's commitment to enhancing corporate accountability and ethical standards, aligning its legal principles with international norms while addressing domestic challenges. By integrating these models and theories into its legal system, Indonesia aims to foster a corporate culture that prioritizes compliance and ethical conduct, thereby mitigating the impact of corporate crime on society and promoting sustainable economic development.

Keywords

Criminal Liability, Models and Theories Corporation, Law Number 1 of 2023

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alhakim, Abdurrakhman, and Eko Soponyono. “Kebijakan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 1, no. 3 (2019): 322–36. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i3.322-336.

Beuermann, Christine. “Discerning the Form at the Second Stage of Vicarious Liability.” The Cambridge Law Journal 81, no. November (2022): 495–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197322000526.

Dewi, Gemala. “The Application of Islamic Business Contract in The National Law Regulations ( The Comparison Between Countries with Civil Law Systems And Common Law Systems ).” Journal of Islamic Law Studies 4, no. 1 (2021).

Dewi, Silvia. “Perumusan Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korporasi Dalam Berbagai Undang-Undang.” Arena Hukum 13, no. 01 (2020): 135–56. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2020.01301.8.

Dwi Kurniawan, Kukuh, and Dwi Ratna Indri Hapsari. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Menurut Vicarious Liability Theory.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 29, no. 2 (2022): 324–46. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art5.

Fauzia, Ana, and Fathul Hamdani. “Analysis of the Implementation of the Non-Conviction-Based Concept in the Practice of Asset Recovery Money Laundering Criminal Act in Indonesia from the Perspective of Presumption of Innocence.” Jurisprudence 11, no. 1 (2021).

Gunawan, Lidya Pratiwi, Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom, Program Studi, Magister Ilmu, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Program Studi, Magister Ilmu, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Trisakti. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Perusakan Lingkungan Hidup” 5, no. 3 (2023): 776–86.

Hidayat, Rahma. Buku Ajar Pengantar Fiqih Muamalah. Medan, 2018.

Kartika Sari, Ayumi. “Pengaruh Politik Hukum Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia Dalihan Na Tolu.” Dalihan Na Tolu Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Komunikasi Indonesia 1, no. 02 (2023): 51–58. https://jurnal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Jhui/issue/view/23.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (2023).

Korkka-knuts, Heli. “Behaviourally Informed Approach to Corporate Criminal Law : Ethicality as Efficiency” 10, no. 1 (2022): 27–56.

Kurniawan, Iwan. “Kriteria Untuk Menenentukan Bentuk-Bentuk Tindak Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dari Korporasi Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Unnes Law Review 5, no. 3 (2023): 1285–1306.

Manullang, Herlina, and Riki Yanto Pasaribu. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korupsi Korporasi. LPPM UHN Press. Medan: LPPHM UHN Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v3i3.33.

Mohan, M P Ram, and Sai Muralidhar K. “In Pursuit of Balance : Vicarious Liability Doctrine in the United Kingdom and India In Pursuit of Balance : Vicarious Liability Doctrine in the United Kingdom and India.” India, 2022.

Pratama, T Andana Harris, Muhammad Ali, and Universitas Airlangga. “Korporasi Sebagai Subyek Hukum Dalam Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup” 5, no. 1 (2023): 611–20. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2672.

Puspitasari, Ikka, and Erdiana Devintawati. “Urgensi Pengaturan Kejahatan Korporasi Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korporasi Menurut RKUHP.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 20, no. 2 (2018): 237–54. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v20i2.10661.

Reza, Aulia Ali. “Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Rancangan KUHP.” Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, 2015, 1–44. http://mappifhui.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Pertanggungjawaban-Korporasi-dalam-Rancangan-KUHP.pdf.

Rodliyah, Any Suryani, and Lalu Husni. “Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi (Corporate Crime) Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesiaa.” Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum 5, no. 1 (2020): 192–206.

Sanjaya, Bahari, Muladi Muladi, and Ratna Kumala Sari. “Inkonsistensi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Luar KUHP.” Pandecta 15, no. 2 (2020): 218–27.

Satria, Hariman. “Indonesia Criminal Law Review.” Indonesia Criminal Law Review 1, no. 1 (2021). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/iclrAvailableat:https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/iclr/vol1/iss1/5.

Sebayang, Albert Sanchez, Zulkarnein Koto, and Marsudin Nainggolan. “Corporate Criminal Liability in Law Enforcement Against Premanism.” HERMENEUTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 2 (2022): 274–82. https://doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v6i2.7462.

Sinaga, Reine, and Marthin Simangungsong Budiman N.P.D. Sinaga. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Direktur Perseroan Terbatas Atas Tindak Pidana Perpajakan Yang Dilakukan Secara Berlanjut (Studi Putusan Nomor 1501/PID.SUS/2019/PN.JKT-BRT).” Patik: Jurnal Hukum 07, no. 3 (2017): 217–28. https://ejournal.uhn.ac.id/index.php/patik/article/download/304/417.

Siregar Arfiani, Vivi. “Polemik Tanggung Jawab Pidana Oleh Kepala Daerah Sebagai Korporasi Terhadap Tindak Pidana Badan Usaha Milik Daerah.” JCI Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah 2, no. 6 (2023): 2625–42. http://bajangjournal.com/index.php/JCI.

Suhariyanto, Budi. “Indonesia Law Review Contradiction Over the Application of Corporate” 13, no. 1 (2023).

UI, Humas. “Kritik Atas Rumusan Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam RKUHP Oleh Prof. Andri Gunawan Wibisana,” 2022. https://law.ui.ac.id/kritik-atas-rumusan-pertanggungjawaban-korporasi-dalam-rkuhp-oleh-prof-andri-gunawan-wibisana/.

Wardhana, Rayhan, and Hascarya Dwiyantama. “Studi Perbandingan Hukum Perwujudan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Antara Inggris Dan Indonesia” 4, no. 1 (2023): 1–7.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.