Evaluation of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Justice in the Era of Advanced Artificial Intelligence Technology

Benny Sumardiana, Pujiyono Pujiyono, Irma Cahyaningtyas

Abstract

In the midst of the rapid development of digital technology, particularly in artificial intelligence (AI), significant changes have occurred in various aspects of life, including law enforcement. This study aims to evaluate how electronic evidence is utilized in Indonesia's criminal justice system, identify the challenges faced, and provide recommendations for improving the effectiveness and fairness of electronic evidence use in light of the advancements in AI technology. This qualitative research effort is dedicated to developing a theoretical framework for the application of electronic evidence within the context of AI, aligning with the technological aspects inherent in digital and criminal investigation research methodologies. The research is based on a qualitative approach. The results indicate that Indonesian law has adapted to technological advances and is now capable of meeting the demands of the digital era. Electronic evidence is legally recognized as a valid form of evidence in the criminal justice system and plays a crucial role in uncovering the material truth in legal cases. It is essential to continuously update regulations, enhance law enforcement skills, and establish a robust ethical framework to effectively address these challenges and optimally utilize the potential of AI in the justice system.

Keywords

Electronic Evidence, Artificial Intelligence, Criminal

References

Aan Setiadarma, Ahmad Zaki Abdullah, Priyono Sadjijo, and Dwi Firmansyah. “Tinjauan Literatur Transformasi Sosial Dalam Era Virtual.” Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora 4, no. 1 (2024): 232–44. https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v4i1.2930.

Bampasika, Eftychia. “Artificial Intelligence as Evidence in Criminal Trial.” CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2844 (2020): 133–38.

BPPT. “Strategi Nasional Kecerdasan Artifisial Indonesia 2020 - 2045.” Badan Pengkajian Dan Penerapan Teknologi, 2020, 194. https://ai-innovation.id/server/static/ebook/stranas-ka.pdf.

Buyers, John. Artificial Intelligence: The Practical Legal Issues. Somerset: Law Brief Publishing. Law Brief Publishing, 2018.

Dahabreh, Fares. “The Continued Usage of Artificial Intelligence in the United Arab Emirates Public Sector Organisations: An Extended Information System Success Model,” 2023, 1–287.

Djanggih, Hardianto, and Nurul Qamar. “Penerapan Teori-Teori Kriminologi Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Siber (Cyber Crime).” Pandecta: Research Law Journal 13, no. 1 (2018): 10–23. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v13i1.14020.

Dmitrieva, A. A., and P. S. Pastukhov. “Concept of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Legal Procedure.” Journal of Digital Technologies and Law 1, no. 1 (2023): 270–95. https://doi.org/10.21202/jdtl.2023.11.

Hartono, Sugi, Made, and Rai Yuliartini, Ni, Putu. “PENGGUNAAN BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM PERADILAN PIDANA.” Nature Microbiology 3, no. 1 (2020): 641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41421-020-0164-0%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.02.027%0Ahttps://www.golder.com/insights/block-caving-a-viable-alternative/%0A???%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15507-2%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-05.

Isima, Nurlaila. “KEDUDUKAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PIDANA” 5, no. 1 (2022): 179–89.

Manope, Indra Janli. “Kekuatan Alat Bukti Surat Elektronik Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana.” Lex Crimen Vol. VI No, no. Vol. VI/No. 2/Mar-Apr/2017 (2017): 107–13. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/15350/14898.

Prasetyo, Eko Surya, Y.A. Triana Ohoiwutun, and Halif Halif. “Implikasi Yuridis Kebijakan Formulasi Alat Bukti Elektronik.” Lentera Hukum 5, no. 2 (2018): 174. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v5i2.7469.

Rahmad, Noor, Kuni Nasihatun Arifah, Deni Setiyawan, Muhammad Ramli, and Brian Septiadi Daud. “Efektivitas Bukti Elektronik Dalam UU ITE Sebagai Perluasan Sistem Pembuktian Dalam KUHAP.” Prosiding 16th Urecol: Seri Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 2022, 96–111.

Ravizki, Eka Nanda, and Lintang Yudhantaka. “Artificial Intelligence Sebagai Subjek Hukum: Tinjauan Konseptual Dan Tantangan Pengaturan Di Indonesia.” Notaire 5, no. 3 (2022): 351–76. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v5i3.39063.

Roth, Andrea. “Trial by Machine.” Georgetown Law Journal 104, no. 5 (2016): 1245–1305.

Sebayang, Ekinia Karolin, Mahmud Mulyadi, and Mohammad Ekaputra. “Potensi Pemanfaatan Teknologi Artificial Intelligence Sebagai Produk Lembaga Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.” Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review 3, no. 4 (2024): 317–28. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v3i4.311.

Sutri Anggita, and Tamaulina Br. Sembiring. “Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Tantangan Dan Prospek Di Era Digital.” Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research 2, no. 1 (2024): 256–71.

Tene, Omer, and Jules Polonetsky. “Judged by the Tin Man: Individual Rights in the Age of Big Data.” Jm 4, no. April (2012): 1–55.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v9i2.50319

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.