PENGEMBANGAN DESAIN GERABAH TRADISIONAL SENTRA PAGELARAN MALANG DENGAN TEKNIK APLIKASI SERAT ALAM MELALUI PROGRAM KEMITRAAN MASYARAKAT

Ponimin Ponimin(1), Triyono Widodo(2), Oktaviviana Asmi Nusantari(3),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/imajinasi.v13i2.21944


(1) Jurusan Seni dan Desain Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang
(2) Jurusan Seni dan Desain Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang
(3) Jurusan Seni dan Desain Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang

Abstract

Produk keramik gerabah trdisional yang diproduksi oleh para perajin sentra Pagelaran Kabupaten Malang kurang memiliki nilai estetik dan ekonomis. Hal ini disebabkan oleh kurangnya pengetahuan, dan kemampuan teknis perajin dalam mengembangkan produknya. Melalui program kemitraan, masyarakat telah dilatih untuk pengembangan desain gerabah tersebut menjadi produk gerabah hias, elemen asesoris interior. Tim Pengabdian Program Kemitraan Masyarakat Universitas Negeri Malang telah membantu menangani persoalan teknis tersebut. Pemecahan masalah melalui metode pelatihan pengembangan desain ornamen produk gerabah hias dengan teknik apikasi berbahan serat alam. Materi pengembangan meliputi desain ornamen produk gerabah hias dengan teknik anyam dan rajut berbahan serat alam lokal. Hasil pengembangan produk gerabah perkakas rumah tangga tradisional menjadi produk elemen estetik interior, antara lain ragam produk gerabah hias kendi, vas bunga, patung figur binatang, dengan kombinasi bahan tali serat alam dan rotan.

Keywords

desain kerajinan, gerabah hias, pelatihan

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afatara, N. 2019. “The Creation of Contemporary Artworkâ€, Proceedings of the Third International Conference of Arts, Language and Culture (ICALC 2018). Dipresentasikan pada The Third International Conference of Arts, Language and Culture (ICALC 2018), Surakarta, Indonesia.

Angelini, F., & Castellani, M. 2019. “Cultural and economic value: A Critical Reviewâ€. Journal of Cultural Economics, 43(2), 173–188. Asful, F. (t.t.). Analisis Pengembangan Usaha Kerajinan Anyaman sebagai Komoditi Unggulan dalam Kerangka Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Rakyat. Australia, Parliament, Inquiry into the Contemporary Visual Arts and Craft Sector, Myer, R., Australia, & Department of Communications, I.

T. and the A. (2002a). Report of the Contemporary Visual Arts and Craft Inquiry. http://www.arts.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/Report_of_the_Contemporary_Visual_Arts_and_Craft_Inquiry.pdf Australia, Parliament, Inquiry into the Contemporary Visual Arts and Craft Sector, Myer, R., Australia, & Department of Communications, I.

T. and the A. (2002b). Report of the Contemporary Visual Arts and Craft Inquiry. http://www.arts.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/Report_of_the_Contemporary_Visual_Arts_and_Craft_Inquiry.pdf

Avdikos, V. 2015. “Processes of Creation and Commodification of Local Collective Symbolic Capital; A Tale of Gentrification from Athensâ€. City, Culture and Society, 6 (4), 117–123.

Bansal, N. P. 2005. Handbook of ceramic composites. http://ebooks.springerlink.com/UrlApi.aspx?action=summary&v=1&bookid=128465

Barlow, F. D., & Elshabini, A. (Ed.). 2007. Ceramic Interconnect Technology Handbook. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.

Blitz, J. H. 2015. “Skeuomorphs, Pottery, and Technological Change: Skeuomorphs, Pottery, and Technological Changeâ€. American Anthropologist, 117(4), 665–678.

Chutia, L. J., & Sarma, M. K. 2016. “Commercialization of Traditional Crafts of South and South East Asia: A Conceptual Model based on Review of Literatureâ€. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 5(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277975215624728.

Colapinto, C., & Porlezza, C. 2012. “Innovation in Creative Industries: From the Quadruple Helix Model to the Systems Theoryâ€. Journal of The Knowledge Economy, 3(4), 343–353.

Della Lucia, M., & Segre, G. 2017. “Intersectoral Local Development in Italy: The Cultural, Creative and Tourism Industriesâ€. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 11(3), 450–462. https://doi. org/10.1108/IJCTHR-03-2016-0032

Gualtieri, A. F., & Tartaglia, A. 2000. “Thermal Decomposition of Asbestos and Recycling in Traditional Ceramicsâ€. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 20 (9), 1409–1418.

Gustami, S., Wardani, L. K., & Setiawan, A. H. (2014). “Craft Arts and Tourism in Ceramic Art Village of Kasongan in Yogyakartaâ€. Journal of Arts and Humanities, (2), 13.

Khoirinnisa, N., & Lodra, I. N. 2015. “Keramik Gerabah Karya Ponimin Tahun 2011â€. Jurnal Pendidikan Seni Rupa, 03, 4.

Lefferts, L., & Cort, L. A. 1999. “Women at the Center of an Industrializing Craft: Earthenware Pottery Production in Northeast Thailandâ€. Museum Anthropology, 23(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1525/mua.1999.23.1.21

Lewis, M. 2008. “Evolutionary Visual Art and Designâ€., J. Romero & P. Machado (Ed.), The Art of Artificial Evolution (3–37).

Novita, Wahyuningtyas, & Lulut Amboro, J. 2017. “Appreciation and Creation in Ceramic Art Learning as A Form of Cultural Preservation for Students of Tk. Pandeyan 2 Sukoharjo in Surakarta Residencyâ€. Jurnal Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya, Nomor 1, Februari 2017, Tahun 45.

Ponimin. 2017. “Revitalization of Traditional Jug into Interior Aesthetic Element with Glocal (Global Local) Cultureâ€. Malang: ISOLEC 1. 2017, 1.

Ponimin. 2018. “Diversifikasi Desain Produk Sentra Keramik Dinoyo Bersumber Ide Budaya Lokal Malangâ€. Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya, 46(1), 111–123.

Satrio, A. A. (2013). Kriya Keramik: Wujud, Posisi, dan Perannya di Masa Kini. CoraK, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24821/corak. v1i2.353

Triyanto. 2016. “Paradigma Humanistik dalam Pendidikan Seniâ€. Imajinasi: Jurnal Seni, 9, 2–10.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share