Dehumanization of Teaching and Learning Activities on Social Science Subject

Dewi Amaliah Nafiati

Abstract


This research aims to describe factors that influence dehumanization of teaching and learning processes. The population of this research was 158 students. The research used a proportional cluster random sampling and 40 students were analyzed as samples. Data were collected by using documentation, observation and questionnaire. The data then quantitatively and qualitatively classified due to the influence of teaching and learning factors on Social Science subject in order to draw the conclusion easily. Findings show that the influence of dehumanization factors on teaching and learning processes are teaching method by 77.9%, curriculum factor by 85%, teacher-student relationship by 63.7%, school discipline by 75.4%, homework by 65.4%, school time by 63.7%, learning equipment by 70.8%, over-standard lesson by 81% and building condition by 80%. The most dominant factor influencing the dehumanization of teaching and learning processes is curriculum by 85%. Thus, teachers are required to improve their competences and capabilities to create a more humanistic teaching learning processes which are more appropriate to the goals of education. In order to achieve the goals, it is recommended to the school administrators to improve the facilities and infrastructure for more conducive teaching and learning processes with more representative spaces and facilities.


Keywords


Dehumanization; Teaching and Learning Process

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bantwini, B. D. (2010). How teachers perceive the new curriculum reform: Lessons from a school district in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.International journal of educational development, 30(1), 83-90.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Pusat Bahasa. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Kenny, R. F., & Wirth, J. (2009). Implementing Participatory, Constructivist Learning Experiences through Best Practices in Live Interactive Performance. Journal of Effective Teaching, 9(1), 34-47.

Khumaidi, K., & Tarmudji, T. (2014). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Intelektual (Iq), Cara Belajar, Dan Kreativitas Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Ekonomi Siswa Kelas Xi Ips Di Sma Negeri 1 Bangsri Kabupaten Jepara. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 3(2).

Maisaroh, S. (2016). Upaya Peningkatkan Motivasi Dan Prestasi Belajar Ips Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Teams Games Tournament.Dinamika Pendidikan, 6(2), 150-169.

Mulkhan, A. (2002). Pendidikan Liberal. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.

Nugroho, R. (2008). Pendidikan Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Pundak, D., Herscovitz, O., Shaham, M., & Wiser-Biton, R. (2009). Instructors attitudes toward active learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 5(1), 215-232.

Setiaji, K. (2015). Pilihan Karir Mengajar Mahasiswa Pendidikan Ekonomi (Kajian Motivasi Karir Mengajar, Career Self Efficacy, Status Sosial Ekonomi, Minat menjadi Guru Terhadap Prestasi Akademik). Dinamika Pendidikan, 10(2), 196-211.

Slameto. (2003). Belajar Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya.Jakarta: Rineka Citra.

Sumaatmadja, N. (2002). Pendidikan Pemanusiaan Manusia Manusiawi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suparlan. (2005). Dehumanisasi Pendidikan. Onlinehttp//www.suparlan.com/page/post42.php. (Juni 2005)

Tim Penyusun Kamus. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa. Depdikbud: Balai Pustaka.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1989.Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Semarang: Aneka Ilmu

Usman, A. (2006). Kebebasan dalam Perbincangan Filsafat, Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuansa Aksara.

Utami, H. W. (2014). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Kooperatif Model Think-Pair-Square Berbantuan Video Pembelajaran Dalam Meningkatan Kreativitas Siswa Pada Kompetensi Dasar Laporan Keuangan. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 2(3).

Winarti, W. (2013).Peningkatan Keaktifan Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pokok Bahasan Penyusutan Aktiva Tetap Dengan Metode Menjodohkan Kotak. Dinamika Pendidikan, 8(2).

Yamin. (2009). Manajemen Mutu Kurikulum Pendidikan. Jogjakarta: Diva Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/dp.v10i2.5098

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.