KAWIN KONTRAK: LATAR BELAKANG,KEABSAHAN HUKUM DAN DAMPAKNYA(STUDI KASUS DI KABUPATEN JEPARA)

Eko Handoyo, Heri Rohayuningsih

Abstract


Marriage of contract is one means for foreigners doing business in Jepara furniture. Contract marriages are not merely a biological needs or sex of the foreign men, but also as a way for them to continue and develop its business in Jepara. The practice of contract marriages in the district of Jepara raises its own problems, especially with regard to the legal validity and impact. That problem revealed after research to him primarily through qualitative research approach. From the data analysis and discussion of sufficient depth to the results, it can be concluded that the economic needs of the dominant factor that causes women want to undergo marriage of contract Jepara. Contract marriage they lived did not have legal validity, both in terms of the National Marriage Law and the views of the Compilation of Islamic Law. Legal protection for the wife and kids there because their marriage is  not valid. For those who contract marriage with siri way, during the ongoing marriage law has not yet felt the impact. After the marriage broke up, the impact of the law was that the ex-wife can't claim property gono-gini and legacy. After married to foreign men, women Jepara changing cultural value system of Javanese culture to European culture, for example, from less efficient to be efficient, from the communal be individualized, and so on.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Asmin. 1986. Status Perkawinan Antar Agama ditinjau dari UU Perkawinan Nomor I Tahun 1974. Jakarta: PT. Dian Rakyat.

Basrowi. 2005. Pengantar Sosiologi.

Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Berg, Bruce L. 1988. Qualitative Research Methods for The Social Sciences. Massachussets: Allyn and Bacon.

Brannen, Julia. 1997. Memadu Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Ktiantitatif. Terjemahan Nuktah Arfawie Kurde, dkk. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Magnis Suseno, Franz.1993. Etika Jawa Sebuah Analisa Falsaft tentang Kebijaksanaan Hidup Jawa.Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Manan, Abdul dan M. Fauzan. 2002. Pokok- pokok Hukum Perdata Wewenang Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.

Miles, Matthews B dan A. Michael Huberman.1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohendy Rohidi. Jakarta: Ul Press.

Murata, Sachiko. 2001. Lebih Jelas tentang Kawin Mulah Perdebatan Suni dan Syiah.TerjemahanTri Wibowo Budi Santoso. Jakarta. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Muthahhari, Murthada. 2000. Hak-hak Wanita dalam Islam. Terjemahan M. Hashem. Jakarta: PT. Lentera Basritama.

Nasution. 1988. Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito.

Patton, Michael Quinn. 1989. Qualitative Evaluation Methods. London and New Delhi: Sage Publications, Inc.

Pusat Bahasa Depdiknas. 2002. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Santoso, Iwan. 2006. Kawin Kontrak di Kawasan Puncak dalam Harian Kompas Senin 17 Juli 2006.

Shihab, M. Quraish. 2006. Perempuan.

Jakarta: Lentera Hati.

Sukmana, Oman. 2005. Sosiologi dan Politik Ekonomi. Malang: UMM.

Surkalam, Luthfi. 2005. Kawin Kontrak dalam Hukum Nasional Kita. Tangerang: CV. Pamulang.

Yin, Robert K. 1997.Studi Kasus Desain dan Metode. Terjemahan M. Djauzi Mudzakir. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/fis.v40i2.5357

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2016 Forum Ilmu Sosial



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View FIS Stats