EMPATI DAN EFIKASI DIRI GURU TERKAIT KEGIATAN BELAJAR MENGAJAR BEBAS BULLYING
(1) Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Muria Kudus
(2) Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Muria Kudus
(3) Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Muria Kudus
Abstract
Abstrak. Bullying adalah permasalahan umum yang terjadi di seluruh negara, pada lingkungan pendidikan di sekolah manapun. Bullying hadir dalam berbagai bentuk, agresi verbal, fisik sampai pada pengucilan dari kelompok. Pelaku bullying tidak hanya terbatas pada siswa, namun juga guru kepada siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian awal yang diharapkan menjadi dasar untuk menyusun metode pelatihan yang efektif dalam menciptakan Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar (KBM) bebas bullying. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji apakah ada perbedaan empati dan efikasi diri guru sekolah dasar (SD) laki-laki dan guru perempuan. Subjek penelitian adalah guru laki-laki dan perempuan yang bertugas di kabupaten Kudus. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan skala empati dan efikasi diri dengan teknik analisis data independent sample t test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan efikasi diri antara guru laki-laki dan perempuan, dengan nilai t sebesar -0,699 df=18, (p>0,05). Pada aspek empati, terdapat perbedaan dengan nilai t sebesar 3,106 df=45,15, (p<0,01). Adanya perbedaan empati dapat disimpulkan bahwa ada perbedaan metode pelatihan KBM bebas bullying khususnya pada pelatihan kemampuan empati pada guru laki-laki dan perempuan.   Â
Â
Abstract. Bullying is a common problem that occurs throughout the country, in an educational environment in any school. Bullying comes in various forms, verbal, physical aggression to the exclusion of the group. Bullying perpetrator are not only limited to students, but also teachers. This research is a preliminary study which is expected to be the basis for formulating effective training methods in creating free bullying teaching activities. This study aims to examine whether there are differences in empathy and self efficacy of primary school teachers (SD) men and female teachers. Research subjects were male and female teachers who served in Kudus. The research instrument used empathy scale and self efficacy with independent data t test. The results showed that there was no difference of self efficacy between male and female teacher, with t value of -0,699 df = 18, (p> 0,05). In aspect empathy, there is difference with t value equal to 3,106 df = 45,15, (p <0,01). The difference of empathy can be concluded that there are different methods of training KBM-free bullying, especially on training the ability of empathy in male and female teachers.
Â
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Azeredo, C. M., Levy, R. B., Araya, R., & Menezes, P. R. (2015). Individual and contextual factors associated with verbal bullying among Brazilian adolescents. BMC Pediatrics, 15(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0367-y
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00
Bugma. (2016). Oknum Guru SD Pukuli Muridnya Hingga Memar. Retrieved September 17, 2017, from https://daerah.sindonews.com/read/1106868/192/oknum-guru-sd-pukuli-muridnya-hingga-memar-1462672099
Choi, L. J., Syawal, M., & Adzrieman, N. (2016). Teachers’ self -efficacy in dealing with bullying among secondary schools students in malaysia. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4, 48–56.
Currie, C., Zanotti, C., Morgan, A., Currie, D., de Looze, M., Roberts, C., … Barnekow, V. (2012). Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2009/2010 survey. World Health Organisation Health Policy for children and adolescents, No 6. https://doi.org/ISBN 987 92 890 1423 6
Demirbağ, B. C., Çiçek, Z., Yiğitbaş, Ç., Özkan, Ç. G., & Dinçer, A. (2017). The Relationship between Types of Bullying Experienced by Primary School Students and their Anxiety, State-Trait, Self-Esteem and Certain Socio-Demographic Characteristics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237(June 2016), 398–404. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.077
Eleni, P. (2014). School Bullying: The Phenomenon, the Prevention and the Intervention. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 268–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.193
Evans, C. B. R., Fraser, M. W., & Cotter, K. L. (2014). The effectiveness of school-based bullying prevention programs: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(5), 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.004
Howard, N. M., Horne, A. M., & Jolliff, D. (2001). Self-efficacy in a new training model for the prevention of bullying in schools. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2(2–3), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1300/J135v02n02_11
Hymel, S., McClure, R., Miller, M., Shumka, E., & Trach, J. (2015). Addressing school bullying: Insights from theories of group processes. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.008
Jevtic, B., Petrovic, Z. S., & Stankovic, A. Z. (2014). Victims or Bullies – Students or Teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 587–596. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.103
Juvonen, J., Espinoza, G., & Schacter, H. L. (2016). Bullying. Encyclopedia of Mental Health, 1, 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-9.00231-7
Lawrence, E. J., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S., & David, A. S. (2004). Measuring empathy: reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychological Medicine, 34(5), 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291703001624
Lucas, A. M. (2012). Paying Attention to Ourselves: Modeling Anti-Bullying Behavior for Students. English Journal, 101(6), 13–15. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1001151〈=es&site=ehost-live%5Cnhttp://www.ncte.org/journals/ej/issues/v101-6
Nickerson, A. B., Aloe, A. M., & Werth, J. M. (2015). The Relation of Empathy and Defending in Bullying: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. School Psychology Review, 44(4), 372–390.
Ozcan, Y. y Çifci, E. G. (2009). The effect of empathy level on peer bullying in schools. Humanity and Social Sciencies Journal, 4(1), 31–38.
Panggabean, J. (2016). Terlambat Masuk Kelas, Siswa SD Ditusuk Guru. Retrieved September 17, 2017, from https://daerah.sindonews.com/read/1099863/191/terlambat-masuk-kelas-siswa-sd-ditusuk-guru-1460296688
Pendergast, D., Garvis, S., & Keogh, J. (2011). Pre-Service Student-Teacher Self-efficacy Beliefs: An Insight Into the Making of Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education Australian Journal of Teacher Education Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(12), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n12.6
Persson, M., & Svensson, M. (2013). The willingness to pay to reduce school bullying. Economics of Education Review, 35, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.02.004
Putra, P. (2016). Terdakwa Guru Cubit Siswa Hanya Dihukum Percobaan. Retrieved September 17, 2017, from https://daerah.sindonews.com/read/1128718/23/terdakwa-guru-cubit-siswa-hanya-dihukum-percobaan-1470297057
Rahayu, C. M. (2017). Hari Anak Nasional, KPAI Soroti Kasus Bullying hingga Pornografi. Retrieved September 18, 2017, from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3569939/hari-anak-nasional-kpai-soroti-kasus-bullying-hingga-pornografi
Rofik, M. (2017). Tak Kerjakan PR, Paha Siswa SD Ini Membiru Dipukul... Retrieved September 17, 2017, from https://daerah.sindonews.com/read/1237277/194/tak-kerjakan-pr-paha-siswa-sd-ini-membiru-dipukul-guru-1504706347
Setiawan, D. (2017). ASTAGA, Tujuh Bulan Terakhir Kementerian Sosial Terima 117 Laporan Kasus Bullying - Tribun Jateng. Retrieved September 18, 2017, from http://jateng.tribunnews.com/2017/07/23/astaga-tujuh-bulan-terakhir-kementerian-sosial-terima-117-laporan-kasus-bullying
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Motivated for teaching? Associations with school goal structure, teacher self-efficacy, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.006
Swearer, S. M., Collins, A., & Berry, B. (2012). Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00077-X
Takunyaci, M., & Takunyaci, M. (2014). Preschool Teachers’ Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Belief. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 673–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.261
Tepetaş, G. Ş., Akgun, E., & Altun, S. A. (2010). Identifying preschool teachers’ opinion about peer bullying. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1675–1679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.964
Topcu, Ç., & Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2012). Affective and cognitive empathy as mediators of gender differences in cyber and traditional bullying. School Psychology International, 33(5), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034312446882
Zulkosky, K. (2009). Self-Efficacy: A Concept Analysis. Nursing Forum, 44(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2009.00132.x
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.