HUBUNGAN WORK ENGAGEMENT DAN ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICACY

Dwi Sri Wakhyuni(1),


(1) Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Terpadu Harapan Umat, Purbalingga, Jawa Tengah

Abstract

Abstrak.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji ada tidaknya hubungan work engagement dan organizational efficacy. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif korelasional. Populasi penelitian ini adalah individu (karyawan) PT Yuro Mustika. Jumlah sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian sejumlah 118 individu (karyawan). Teknik sampling yang dipakai yaitu incidental sampling. Data penelitian dihimpun menggunakan skala work engagement dan skala organizational efficacy. Skala organizational efficacy terdiri dari 43 aitem dengan koefisien daya beda aitem sebesar 0,308 sampai dengan 0,687 dan koefisien reliabilitas sebesar 0,910. Skala work engagement terdiri dari 32 aitem dengan koefisien daya beda aitem antara 0,318 sampai dengan 0,597 dan koefisien reliabilitas sebesar 0,881. Organizational efficacy individu (karyawan) PT Yuro Mustika berada dalam kategori sedang dengan aspek yang paling berpengaruh adalah sense of mission, future or purpose. Kondisi work engagement individu (karyawan) PT Yuro Mustika berada dalam kategori sedang dengan dimensi yang paling berpengaruh adalah vigor atau energi dan ketahanan mental ketika menghadapi sebuah hambatan dalam bekerja. Metode analisis dalam penelitian ini menggunakan teknik korelasi Product Moment dengan hasil koefisien korelasi sebesar (rxy) 0,485 dan nilai signifikansi sebesar 0,000 (p < 0,01). Berdasarkan nilai koefisien tersebut, hipotesis “ada hubungan work engagement dan organizational efficacy” diterima.

Abstract

This research’s purpose is to find out the correlation between work engagement and organizational efficacy. This is a correlational quantitative research with the company employees from PT Yuro Mustika as the population. The number of sample that used in this research is 118 persons. Using incidental technique as the sampling technique, this research data gathered with work engagement scale and organizational efficacy scale. Organizational efficacy scale consists of 43 items with coefficient validity per item in the amount of 0,308 to 0,687 and reliability coefficient in the amount of 0,910. Work engagement scale consists of 32 items with coefficient validity per item in the amount of 0,318 to 0,597 and reliability coefficient in the amount of 0,881. The individual organizational efficacy of the employees in PT Yuro Mustika include in the middle category with the most influences aspect called sense of mission, future or purpose. The individual work engagement condition of the employees in PT Yuro Mustika include in the middle category with the most influences dimension called vigor or energy and mental toughness in facing the working obstacles. The analysis method in this research using correlation technique Product Moment with correlation coefficient result in the number of (rxy) 0,479 and the point of significant is 0,000 (p < 0,01). Based on the coefficient point above, the hypothesis “there is a correlation between work engagement and organizational efficacy” has been accepted. The higher work engagement the higher organizational efficacy too and so does the opposite, the lower work engagement the lower organizational efficacy.

Keywords

Work engagement, Organizational efficacy, Employees

Full Text:

PDF

References

Admasachew, Lul & Dawson, Jeremy. 2012.

Employe Engagement – A Review of Definitions, Theoritical Perspectives and Measures. Di unduh di https://www.gov.uk/government/uplo ads/system/uploads/attachment_data/f

ile/215465/dh_129661.pdf. Pada tanggal 30 Mei 2015.

Akta, Ersa. cicek, Isik, & Kiyak, Mithat. 2011. The Effect of Organizational Culture on Organizational Efficacy: The Moderating Role of Organizational Enviroment and CEO Value. Procedia Social and Behavior Sciences. Vol 24. No 1. Hal 1560-1573.

Alsa, Asmadi. 2007. Pendekatan Kuantitatif

Dan Kualitatif Serta Kombinasinya

Dalam Penelitian Psikologi.

Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Andrew, Ologbo C & Sofian, Saudah. 2012. Individual Faktors and Work Outcomes of Employee. International Conference on Asia Pacific Business Innovation & Technology Management, Pattaya, Thailand. Vol 40. No 1. Hal 498-508.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur

Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Pratik.

Jakarta: Rineka CiPTa.

Arsanti, Tutuk Ari. 2009. Hubungan Antara Penetapan Tujuan, Self-Efficacy dan Kinerja. Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi (JBE) , Vol. 16. No 2. Hal. 97 – 110.

Azwar, Saifuddin. 2014. Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, Saifuddin. 2012.Reliabilitas dan Validitas Edisi 4. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar

Azwar, Saifuddin. 2011. Metode Penelitian.

Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bakker, Arnold B, & Leiter, Michael P. 2010.

Work Engagement A Handbook of

Essential Theory and Reserch. New

York: Psychology Press.

Bakker, Arnold B. 2008. Towards a model of Work Engagement. Career Development International. Vol. 13 No. 3. Hal 209-223.

Bakker, Arnold B & Demerouti. 2008. Work Engagement: An Emerging in

Occupational Helth Psychology.

University Library Utrecht. Vol 22.

No 3. Hal. 187-200.

Bandura, Albert. 1997. Self-efficacy The Exercise Of Control. New York: Freeman Company.

Baterman, J Mark & Rungutt, John K. 1996. Faculty Receptivity/resistance to Change, Personal and Organizational Efficacy, Decision Depri Vation and Effectiveness in Reaserch I University. Association for the Higher Education. Vol 150. No 143. Hal 1-39.

Bohn, James G & Grafton. 2002. The Relationship of Perceived Leadership Behaviors to Organizational Efficacy.

The Journal of Leadership and

Organization Studies. Vol 9. No 1.

Hal 65-79.

Bohn, James G. 2010. Human Resource Development Quarterly. Vol 21. No 3. Hal 227-251.

Chaudhary, Richa. Rangnekar, Santosh & Baru, Mukesh Kumar. 2013. Engagement Versus Disengagement: The Role of Occupational Self Efficacy. Department of management studies, indian institute of technology, roorkee. Vol 18. No 1. Hal 91-108.

Chaudhary, Richa. Rangneka2r, Santosh & Baru, Mukesh Kumar. 2012. Impact of Occupational Self-efficacy on Employee Engagement: An Indian Perspective. Jurnal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology. Vol 38. No 2. Hal 329-338.

Cherian, Jacob & Jacob, Jolly. 2013. Impact of Efficacy on Motivation and Performance of Employees.

International Journal of Business and Management. Vol 8. No 14. Hal 80-85.

Clarke, James S; Ellett, Chad D; Baterman, J Mark; & Rugutt, John K. 1996.

Faculty Receptivity/Resistance to

Change, Personal and Organizational Efficacy,Decision Deprivation and Effectiveness in Research I Universities. Texas: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

Decker, Carol A. 2010. Invited Reaction: Development and Exploratory Validationan Organizational Efficacy Scale. Di unduh di Eric.ed.gov. pada tanggal 2 desember 2015.

Demerouti, E; AB, Bakker; Jonge, de; Janseen; & Schaufeli. 2001. Burnout and Engagement at Work as A Fuction of Demands And Control.

Original article Scand J Work Environ Helth. Vol 27. No 4. Hal 279-286.

Goddart, Ruger D; Hoy, Wayne K & Hoy, Anita Woolfolk. 2004. Collective Efficacy Beliefs:Theoretical Developments, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions. Jurnal. Educational Researcher. Vol 33. No 3. Hal 3-13.

Hadi, Sutrisno. 2004. Statistik. Yogyakarta:

ANDI OFFSET.

James, & Grafton. 2002. The Relation of Perceived Leadership Behaviors to Organizational Efficacy. Journal of Leadership & Organization studies.

Vol 9. No 2. Hal 65-79.

Lunenburg, Fred C. 2011. Self-Efficacy in The Workplace: Implicatioans for Motivation and Performance.

International Journal of Management

Business and Administration. Vol 14.

No 1. Hal 1-6.

Marcey, William H & Schneider, Benjamin. 2008. The Meaning of Employee Engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Vol 1. No 1. Hal 3-30.

Macey, William H; Schneider, Benjamin; Barbera, Karen M & Young, Scott A. 2009. Employee Engagement, tools for analysis, Practice, and

Competitive Advantage, Wiley‐ Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom. http://samples.sainsburysebooks.co.uk /9781444306545_sample_415136.pdf. Pada tanggal 01 Maret 2015.

McDowell & William C. 2013.The Impact Of Organizational Efficacy And Flexibility on Small Business Performance. The Coastal Business Journal. Vol. 12, No 1. Hal 1-16.

Nurofia, Fifle. Di unduh di www.schoolar.google.com. Pada tanggal 8 April 2015.

Nurhendar, Siti. 2007. Pengaruh Stress Kerja dan Semangat Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Bagian Produksi (Studi Kasus Pada CV. Aneka Ilmu Semarang). Diunduh di www.foxitsoftware.com. Pada tanggal 18 Maret 2015.

Nasrudin, Edin. 2010. Psikologi Manajemen.

Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Nyman, Krista. 2014. Enhancing Employee

Engagement Through More Effective

Online Leadership Communication.

Helsinki: Haaga-Helia.

Purwanto, Edy. 2013. Metode Penelitian

Kuantitatif. Semarang: Swadaya

Manunggal.

Rachman, Ryan. 2015.Puluhan Buruh PT

Yuro Mustika Tuntut Pesangon PHK.

Diunduh di http://berita.suara merdeka.com/puluhan-buruh-PT-yuro-mustika-tuntut-pesangon-phk. Pada tanggal 18 April 2015.

Schaufeli, Wilmar. 2011. Work Engagemen: What Do We Know. Diunduh di

www.gov.uk/goverment. Pada tanggal 06 Juni 2015.

Schaufeli, Wilmar; B. Bakker, Arnold B. Salanova, Marisa. 2006. The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire A Cross-National Study. Educational and Psychogical Meansurement. Vol 66. No 4. Hal 701-716.

Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian

Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D.

Bandung: Alfabeta.

Verma, Anju & Sharma, Briji. 2013. Level Determination of Self and Organizational Efficacy. Di unduh di www.ijari.org. Pada tanggal 18 Desember 2015.

Yakin, Mustafa & Erdil, Oya. 2012. Relationships Between Self-Efficacy and Work Engagement and the Effects on Job Satisfaction: A Survey on Certified Public Accountants.

International Stategic Management Conference. Vol 58. No 1. Hal 370-378.

Zimmerman. Barry J. 2000. Self Efficacy: An

Essensi Motive to Learn. Jurnal.

Contenporary Educational

Psychology. Vol 25. No 1. Hal 82-91.

Zulkarnain. Hadiyani, Sherry. 2014. Peranan

Komitmen Organisasi dan Employee

Engagement tehadap Kesiapan

Karyawan untuk Berubah. Jurnal

Psikologi Fakultas Psikologi

Universitas Sumatra Utara. Vol 21.

No 1. Hal 19-35.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.