THE EVALUATION OF THE PRESENT FRENCH TEXTBOOK USED IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS IN SEMARANG AND ITS SURROUNDINGS

Sri Rejeki Urip, Astini Su’udi, Mursid Saleh

Abstract


School Based Curriculum (SBC) as one of the decentralization in education authorizesteachers to develop their own teaching materials. The fact shows that the teacher is stillminimal in writing, including writing textbooks. To facilitate French teachers in writing a Frenchtextbook, a guideline is needed. In Exploration Phase of Research and Development , one ofthe objectives is to find out the quality of French textbook used today. Knowing its strengthsand weaknesses is useful because the information can be used as data for developing aguideline for writing a better French textbook. To collect the data, the methods used were(1) Document Analysis, (2) In-depth interviews, (3) Questionnaires, and (4) Focus GroupDiscussion. To analyze the data, the Constant Comparative Method was utilized. For thetrustworthiness of the data, Triangulation, Member-checking were applied. By using theFrench textbook evaluation instrument set by BSNP and equipped with Cunningsworthcriteria, the six volumes of Bonjour Chers Amis were evaluated. There are four components tobe evaluated: Feasibility of Contents, Feasibility of Presentation, Feasibility of Language, andPractical considerations. The findings reveal that the criteria of French textbook evaluation ofBSNP has not been implemented optimally. These findings provide the information of thequality of the French textbook currently used in Semarang and its surroundings. Theinformation can be used as an overview what things are to be followed and avoided indeveloping a guideline for writing a French textbook integrating SBC and CEFRL.

Keywords


French textbook; content feasibility; presentation feasibility; language feasibility; practical considerations

Full Text:

PDF

References


Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan

Menengah. Jakarta : BSNP

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan dan Pusat Perbukuan Depdiknas. 2009.Instrumen 1 dan Deskripsi Penilaian Buku Teks Pelajaran Bahasa Prancis. Jakarta.

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan dan Pusat Perbukuan Depdiknas. 2009. Instrumen 2 dan Deskripsi Penilaian

Buku Teks Pelajaran Bahasa Prancis. Jakarta.

Cohen, D and Crabtree, B.2006. “Lincoln and Guba’s Evaluative Criteria” in Qualitative Research Guideline

Project. July 2006. In http://www.qualres.org/HomeLinc-

html [Accessed 19/52011]

Creswell, John W., and Miller, Dana L. 2006. “Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry” in Theory into Practice.Volume 39, Number 3, Summer 2000. College of Education.

The Ohio State University in http://web.media.mit.edu/~kbrennan/ mas790/04/Creswell,%20Determining

%20validity%20in%20qualitative%20in quiry.pdf [Accessed 26/5/2011]

Cunningsworth, Alan. 1995. Choosing Your Coursebook. Great Britain: Heinemann English Language Teaching.

Depdiknas. 2001. Manajemen Peningkatan Mutu Berbasis Sekolah. Buku 1 Konsep dan Pelaksanaan. Jakarta.

Dornyei, Zoltan. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lincoln and Guba’s Evaluative Criteria in Cohen D, Crabtree B.2006. Qualitative Research Guideline Project. July 2006. In http://www.qualres.org/HomeLinc- 3684.html [Accessed 19/52011].

Morse, J.M., Barrett,M., Mayan,M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. 2002. “Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research”. International Journal of Qualitative

Methods 1 (2), article 2, in http://www.ualberta.ca/ ~ijqm/

[Accessed 24/5/2011]

Richards, Jack C.2006. Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambrigde : Cambridge University Press.

Saleh, Mursid. 2008. Enam Tradisi Besar Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Semarang: UNNES Press.

Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin.2007. Dasar-dasar Penelitian Kualitatif.Tatalangkah dan Teknikteknik Teoritisasi Data.Terj. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih.2008. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Program Pascasarjaan Universitas

Pendidikan Indonesia dengan PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Swisma. 2009. Guru dan Dosen Minim Menulis. http://www.harianglobal.com/ index.php?option=com_content&view= article&id=26543:guru-dan-dosen-inimmenulis- buku-teks-&catid=56: edukasi

&Itemid=63[Accessed 29 January 2010]

The Constant Comparative Method in www.health.herts.ac.uk/.../

constant_comparative_method. htm [Accessed 4/5/2011]

Tomlinson, Brian. 1998. Materials Development in Language

Teaching10th printing 2007. United Kingdom: Cambridge University.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v6i1.2047

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License