COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION (CIRC) BASED INTERACTIVE CD IN TEACHING READING

Husni Mubarok, Dwi Erlin Effendi, Nina Sofiana

Abstract


This paper was aimed at describing students activities during the implementation of teaching reading through CIRC-based interactive CD, knowing students achievement in reading after taught by using the media, and their responses toward the implementation of the media. This study was conducted on nine different junior high schools in Jepara. The subject of the study was seventh grade students. The research method of this study was classroom action research in which the researchers used observation, test, and questionnaire. Observation was used to collect the data dealing with students activities in the classroom. Test was used to measure students achievement before the implementation, first cycle and second cycle. Questionnaire was used to get students responses toward the implementation of the media. The result showed that there were some activities in teaching reading like reading group and team and basal-related activities. The improvement of students score was also improved before and after the implementation. It was showed by the students average score 7.6 (before), 7.8 (first cycle), and 8.0 (second cycle). Students perception toward reading was also changed in the aspect of reading nature, learning reading, strange with vocabulary, getting main idea, and teaching media.


Keywords


cooperative integrated reading and composition, reading

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akyol, H., Cakiroglu, A., & Kuruyer, H. 2014. A Study on the Development of Reading Skills of the Students Having Difficulty in Reading : Enrichment Reading Program 1. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 199212.

Alexiou, T., & Mattheoudakis, M. 2013. Introducing a Foreign Language at Primary Level: Benefits or Lost Opportunities? The Case of Greece. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 99120.

Bastug, M., & Demirtas, G. 2016. Child-Centered Reading Intervention: See , Talk , Dictate, Read , Write! International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(4 June), 601616.

Brown, D. 2001. Teaching by Principles; An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education International.

Brown, D. 2004. Language Assessment; Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education International.

Calderon, M., Hertz-Lazarowitz, & Slavin, R. 1998. Effects of Bilingual Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition on Students Making the Transition from Spanish to English Reading. The Elementary School Journal, 99(2), 153164.

Cameron, L. 2001. Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carter, R., & Nunan, D. 2001. Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, D. 2003. English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Glanz, J. 1998. Action Research: An Educational Leaders Guide to School Improvement. Norwood: Christopher-Gordon Publisher Inc.

Harmer, J. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Pearson Education International.

Khan, S. A., & Ahmad, R. N. 2014. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Method versus Traditional Learning Method on the Reading Comprehension of the Students. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 8(1), 5564.

Khansir, A. A., & Farajolahzadeh, S. 2015. The Effect of GI and CIRT as The Cooperative Techniques On Learners Reading Comprehension at Intermediate Level of IranianEFL Classrooms. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods (MJLTM), 4(5), 477488.

Larsen-freeman, D. 2003. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pearce, D. 2015. Developing a Rubric for the Evaluation of Reading Programs for Johnston County Schools. East Carolina University.

Pelton, R. P. 2010. Action Research for Teacher Candidates. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

Tanaka, M., & Sanchez, E. 2016. Students Perceptions of Reading Through Peer Questioning in Cooperative. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 19(4), 117.

Zarei, A. A., & Keshavarz, J. 2011. On the Effects of Two Models of Cooperative Learning on EFL Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 1(2), 3854.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v11i1.7846

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License