Performance Analysis of Transform University Studies in Indonesia Context

Eduart Wolok, Hermanto Siregar, Setiadi Djohar, Lukman M. Baga

Abstract

The purpose of this study are to analyze the performance of Universitas Negeri Gorontalo (UNG) in the financial and academic aspects; to analyze the gaps in financial performance and academic performance; and to know the differences in financial performance and academic performance before and after transformation into a State Universities Public Service Agency (PTN BLU). The analysis method used are descriptive analysis, gap analysis by calculating the average expected service level, and average calculation for perceived service actual performance, and t-test. The result of the research shows that the implementation of governance especially in the case of service is increasing and efficient. Besides that, after the transformation into BLU,UNG shows various progress, especially the improvement of financial performance as measured from income level from Non-Tax Revenue (PNBP), and from Revenue Budget and State Expenditure (APBN), while the academic performance, measured from 12 indicators covering tri darma of higher education, has increased significantly compared to when UNG is still part of the Work Unit (SATKER). While the results of gap analysis show that the academic and financial performance perceived by lecturers and UNG employees is higher than the quality of expectedservice. The financial performance of UNG before and after BLU has significant differences, as well as the academic performance.

Keywords

Implementation; Performance; Remuneration; Financial Performance; Academic Performance.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adewale, O & Anthonia, A. 2013. Impact of Organizational Culture on Human Resource Practices: a Study of Selected Nigerian Private Universities. Journal of Competitiveness. 5(4): 115-133.

Bloch, C & Schneider, J. W. 2016. Performance Based Funding Models and Researcher Behavior: Analysis of the Influence of the Norwegian Publication Indicator at the Individual Level. Research Evaluation. 25 (4): 371-382.

Bogt, H. J. Ter., G. Jan, V. H & Berend, V. D. K. 2015. Challenging the NPM Ideas About Performance Management: Selectivity and Differentiation in Outcome-Oriented Performance Budgeting. Financial Accountability & Management in Governments, Public Services and Charities. 31(3): 287-315.

Carlitz, R. 2013. Improving Transparency and Accountability in the Budget Process: an Assessment of Recent Initiatives. Development Policy Review. 31(1):49-67.

Duren, P. 2017. Total Quality Management in Academic Libraries-Best Practices. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries. 1(1): 43-50.

Haryanto, S. 2016. Profitability Identification of National Banking Through Credit, Capital, Capital Structure, Efficiency and Risk Level. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen. 7 (1): 11-21.

Hilmi. 2016. Effect of Social and Environmental Performance Financial of the Company. Eoropean Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research. 4(9):30-59.

Kasih, D.P.D. 2014. The Existence of Public Service Entity ‘Badan Layanan Umum’ To Undertake Governmental Function. JournalAcademic Research International. 5(1): 326-333.

Kurniawan, Y., Purwito, A & Nurani T.W.2016. Pencapaian Indikator Kinerja Bidang Akademik Program Sarjana Pada Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan Institut Pertanian Bogor dalam Perspektif Penjaminan Mutu. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis dan Manajemen (JABM). 2(3): 23-34.

Maharani, A., Adi, W & Muhtar. 2013. Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Sebelum dan Sesudah Penerapan Pola Pengelolaan Keuangan Badan Layanan Umum. JUPE (Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi). 1 (3): 1-10.

Vries, H. D. 2015. Innovation in the Public Sector: a Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Administration. 94(1): 146-166.

Mlambo, V. 2011. An Analysis of Some Factors Affecting Student Academic Performance in an Introductory Biochemistry Course at the University of the West Indies. Caribbean Teaching Scholar. 1(2): 79-92.

Munir, S. 2016. Implementasi Penyusunan Anggaran Badan Layanan Umum dari Perspectif Good Governance (Studi di Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Brawijaya). e-Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik. 2(3).

Murdiati, S. 2014. Analisis Kinerja Keuangan dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Rasio Camel. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen. 5 (1): 12-30.

Murwatiningsih. 2015. Analisys of Perceived Quality of Education Service. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen. 6 (1): 40-54.

Robescu, O & Iancu, A-G. 2016. The Effects of Motivation on Employees Performance in Organizations. Valahian Journal of Economic Studies.7(21): 49-56.

Ryan, T. 2015. Quality Assurance in Higher Education: a Review of Literature. Higher Learning Research Communications. 5(4): 244-257.

Sichigea, D., Florentin, G & Tupangiu, L. 2011. Financial Performance Indicators-Instruments in Lending Decision Making. Finances-Challenges of the Future. 11(13): 168-174.

Sumardi, S. 2008. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Tippet, J & Kluvers, R. 2009. Employee Rewards and Motivation in Non Profit Organizations: Case Study from Australia. International Journal of Business and Management. 4(3): 7-14.

Triani, N. N. A., Lintang, V., Ibnu, Q &Ardiansyah, M. 2014. Model Good University Governance dalam Mendeteksi Fraud di Universitas yang Bersistem BLU. Proceedings: 3rd Economics & Business Research Festival, Business Dynamics Toward Competitive Economics. 13 November 2014.

Widodo, J. 2012. Determinan Kinerja Akademik Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Unnes. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Dinamika Pendidikan. 7(2): 94-101.

Youssef, A., Ben, D & Mounir. 2008. The Impact of ICT on Student Performance in Higher Education: Direct Effects, Indirect Effects and Organisational Change. Revista de Universidad Sociedad del Conocimiento. 5(1): 45-56.

View Counter: Abstract - 522 and PDF - 453

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share