Infrastructure and Labour Productivity Convergence in Gunungkidul Region

Didit Welly Udjianto, Joko Susanto, Purwiyanta Purwiyanta

Abstract


The paper examines whether labour productivity converges or diverges. This research estimates the convergence of labour productivity, and the effects of infrastructure to support this convergence, based on a set panel data comprising 18 districts in Gunungkidul Regency from 2009 to 2016. The secondary data published by the Statistics of DIY is used in this study. The infrastructure includes educational facilities, health facilities and length of the road. A fixed-effect model presents that there is a process of convergence of labour productivity among districts in Gunungkidul Regency. Moreover, the result shows that infrastructure has a positive effect on labour productivity. This research finds that labour productivity, in the lagging districts, tends to grow faster than advanced ones. Thus, the labour productivity gap between districts will disappear. A better educational and health facilities supports the speed of the knowledge transfer process to generate productive labour. For supporting the convergence of labour productivity, the local government has to improve infrastructure especially in lagging districts. Likewise, improvements in road facilities solve the problem of high-cost distribution to increase labour productivity.


Keywords


productivity, labour, convergence, infrastructure

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acemoglu, D. and Johnson, S., 2006. Disease and Development: The Effect of Life Expectancy on Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper Series, No.12269.

Baltagi, Badi, 2005. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Barbieri, Laura, 2006. Panel Cointegration Tests: A Review, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza

Barro, Robert J. and Xavier Sala-i Martin. 2004. Economic Growth 2nd Edition. MIT Press, London.

Chevalier, P.-A., Lecat, R. & Oulton, N. 2012. Convergence of Firm-Level Productivity, Globalisation and Information Technology: Evidence from France. Economics Letters, 116.

Cole Matthew A. and Eric Neumayer, 2007, The Impact of Poor Health on Total Factor Productivity, Journal of Development Studies, 42(6), pp. 918-938

Del Bo, Chiara, Massimo Florio, and Giancarlo Manzi. 2010. Regional Infrastructure and Convergence: Growth Implications in a Spatial Framework, Transition Studies Review, 17(3), pp. 475-493.

de la Fuente A., and Doménech R. (2006) Human Capital In Growth Regressions: How Much Difference Does Data Quality Make? Journal of the European Economic Association 4(1): 1-36.

Cette, Gilbert, Simon Corde and Rémy Lecat, 2012, Firm-level Productivity Dispersion and Conver-gence Working Papers of the Banque de France.

Fingleton B, and López-Bazo E. (2006) Empirical Growth Models With Spatial Effects. Papers in Regional Science 85 (2): 177-219.

Girma, S. & Kneller, R. 2005. Convergence in the UK Service Sector: Firm Level Evidence, 1988–1998. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52(5), 736-746.

Iacovone, Leonard, Luis F. Sánchez-Bayardo and Siddharth Sharma, 2015. Regional Productivity Convergence in Peru, Policy Research Working Paper 7499.

Islam, N., (2003), “What Have We Learnt From The Convergence Debate?”, Journal of Economic Survey, 17 (3), 309-362.

Ito, Tadashi 2010. NAFTA and Productivity Conver-gence between Mexico and the US, Cuadernos de Economía, 47 (Mayo), pp. 15-55.

Jan, Sajjad Ahmad dan A.R. Chaudhary. 2011. Testing the Conditional Convergence Hypothesis for Pakistan. Pak. J. Commer. Soc. Sci., 5(1), pp. 117-128.

Lall, S., Z. Shalizi, and U. Deichmann, 2004. Agglo-meration Economies and Productivity in Indian Industry, Journal of Development Economics, 73(2), pp. 643-673

Lancheros ,Sandra and Chris Milner, 2015. Globali-sation and Regional Productivity Convergence: A Firm-level Analysis from India, Working Paper, University of Nottingham Ningbo China and GEP.

Liew, V.K. S., 2004. Which Lag Length Selection Criteria Should We Employ? Economics Bulletin, 3(33), pp. 1−9.

López-Bazo E; Vayá E, Artís M (2004) Regional Exter-nalities and Growth: Evidence from European Regions. Journal of Regional Science 44 (1): 43-73

Mahmood, Tahir, 2012, Labour Productivity Conver-gence in 52 Industries: A Panel Data Analysis of Some European Countries, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2(3), pp. 320-339

Männasoo, Kadri, Heili Hein And Raul Ruubel, 2016. Regional Productivity Convergence In Advanced And Emerging European Economies, European Policy Analysis, 12.

Mitra, Pritha and Cyril Pouvelle, 2012. Productivity Growth and Structural Reform in Bulgaria: Restarting the Convergence Engine, IMF Working Paper European Department.

Naveed, Amjad dan Nisar Ahmad, 2016, Labour Pro-ductivity Convergence and Structural Changes: Simultaneous Analysis at Country, Regional and Industry Levels, Economic Structures, 5(19), pp. 1-17

Nishimura, K. G., Nakajima, T. & Kiyota, K. 2005. Productivity Convergence at the Firm Level University of Tokyo MMRC Discussion Paper No. 39.

Ozturk, Ilhan, 2001. The Role of Education in Economic Development: A Theoretical Perspective, Journal

of Rural Development and Administration, 33(1), pp. 39-47.

Petrakis P E, Stamatakis D (2002) Growth and Educational Levels: A Comparative Analysis. Economics of Education Review 21 (5): 513–521

Rosenthal S S, Strange W C (2008) The Attenuation of Human Capital Externalities. Journal of Urban Economics 64 (2): 373-389

Sondermann, David, 2012. Productivity in The Euro Area: Any Evidence of Convergence? European Central Bank, Working Paper Series No 1431

Wilkinson, R. and Pickett, K., 2011, The Spirit Level, Bloomsbury Press Kim.

Yang, Yang, 2017. Transport Infrastructure, City Produc¬tivity Growth and Sectoral Reallocation: Evidence from China, RIEI Working Papers 2017-08, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v11i2.16057

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.