Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada) dan Tantangan Demokrasi Lokal di Indonesia

Suyatno Suyatno(1),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpi.v1i2.6586


(1) Universitas Kanjuruhan Universitas Airlangga

Abstract

Direct local leader elections (Pilkada) had replaced indirect local elections. It based on the spirit of people empowerment to participate choosing local leaders more democratic. Responsiveness is an important element besides participation which represent local democracy. These two variables will decide the local elections that can enhance the quality of local democracy. This paper uses qualitative methodology to analyze the data of participation and responsiveness of Pilkada as an important variables in local democracy. People participation in Pilkada is not as high as the participation in New Order elections. Their participation are more substantive because accompanied assessment of the level of responsiveness of a local leader. Incumbent successful running of local responsiveness will get continued success as the next local elections victory. In contrast, incumbent who failed in the implementation of responsiveness will obtain defeat. Victory and defeat incumbent in the election can be stated that the relevance of participation and responsiveness become very important in the local democratic process as a whole.

Keywords

Pilkada; Participation; Responsiveness; Local Democracy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia, “Pilkada Semakin Demokratis Tapi Partisipasi Cenderung Menurun”, Selasa, 10 November 2015, dalam http://bawaslu.go.id/id/berita/pilkada-semakin-demokratis-tapi-partisipasi-cenderung-menurun. Diunduh pada 1 Mei 2016.

BBC Indonesia, “Pilkada serentak, sejumlah calon petahana unggul”, dalam http://www.bbc.com/indonesia/berita_indonesia/2015/12/151210_indonesia_pilkada_petahana. Diunduh pada 1 Mei 2016.

Camille Burnet, Henry Minis, dan Jerry VanSant, Democratic Decentralization, dalam http://www.rti.org/pubs/Democr_Decen.PDF. Diakses 10 Januari 2008.

Dedy Priatmojo, “Lima Faktor Calon Petahana Unggul di Pilkada Serentak”, dalam http://politik.news.viva.co.id/news/read/709835-lima-faktor-calon-petahana-unggul-di-pilkada-serentak. Diunduh pada 5 Mei 2016.

De Tocqueville, A. (2003). Democracy in america (Vol. 10). Regnery Publishing.

Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. JHU Press. Dwiyanto, A. (2006). Reformasi birokrasi publik di Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Easton, D. (1957). An approach to the analysis of political systems. World politics, 9(03), 383-400.

Fatkhurohman, F. (2010). Pilkada Dan Masa Depan Penguatan Demokrasi di Daerah. Jurnal Konstitusi, 3(2).

Fitriyah, F. (2013). Meninjau Ulang Sistem Pilkada Langsung: Masukan Untuk Pilkada Langsung Berkualitas.

Frerks, G. E., Otto, J. M., & Asmerom, H. K. (1996). Decentralization and Development: A Review of Development Administration Literature: In Commemoration of Dr Haile K. Asmerom. Van Vollenhoven Institute for Law and Administration in Non-Western Countries.

Hijri, Y. S. (2016). KPUD, Pilkada Langsung dan Demokrasi Lokal. Jurnal Bestari, 1(37).

Kompas, “Petahana Tetap Kuat di Pilkada 2015”, dalam http://nasional.kompas .com/read/2016/01/07/02205431/Petahana.Tetap.Kuat.di.Pilkada.2015. Di unduh pada 5 Mei 2016.

MacAndrews, C., & Masʼud, M. (1991). Perbandingan Sistem Politik. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Manor, J., & World Bank. (1999). The political economy of democratic decentralization.

Pratikno (2005). ”Demokrasi dalam Pilkada Langsung”, Makalah, Sarasehan Menyongsong Pilkada Langsung, IRCOS-FNSt, Hotel Saphir, Yogyakarta, 25-26 Januari 2005.

Puskapik, “Musim Bergugurannya Calon Incumbent (Petahana) dalam Pilkada, bagaimana dengan Pemalang?” dalam http://www.puskapik.com/ musim-bergugurannya-calon-petahana-incumbent-dalam-pilkada-bagaimana-dengan-pemalang/. Diunduh pada 5 Mei 2016.

Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton university press.

Rondinelli, DA. (1998). "What is Decentralization?" Note prepared for the PREM Knowledge Management System, World Bank, Washington, DC.

Rumesten, I. (2014). Korelasi Perilaku Korupsi Kepala Daerah dengan Pilkada Langsung. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(2).

Saraswati, R. (2014). Reorientasi Hukum Pemilukada yang Mensejahterakan Rakyatnya. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(2).

Simamora, J. (2011). Eksistensi Pemilukada Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Pemerintahan Daerah yang Demokratis. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 23(1), 221-236.

Siri Gloppen, Lise Rakner and Arne Tostensen, Responsiveness to the Concerns of the Poor and Accountability to the Commitment to Poverty Reduction, dalam http://www.undp.org/oslocentre/PAR_Bergen_2002/concerns-poor-issues-paper.pdf. (20 Januari 2015).

Sisk, T. D., Ballington, J., Subiyanto, A., & Maxim, S. (2002). Demokrasi di tingkat lokal: buku panduan International IDEA mengenai keterlibatan, keterwakilan, pengelolaan konflik, dan kepemerintahan. International IDEA.

Smith, B. C., & Smith, B. C. (1985). Decentralization: the territorial dimension of the state (pp. 1-52). London: Allen & Unwin.

Soebagio, H. (2008). Implikasi Golongan Putih Dalam Perspektif Pembangunan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Sumber, 21(8).

Sutoro, E. (2006). Voice, Akses, dan Kawalan Masyarakat, makalah dalam www.ireyogya.org/sutoro/voice_dan_akses_masyarakat.pdf. (2 Pebruari 2006)

Suyatno (2011). Dinamika Demokrasi Tempatan di Indonesia: Kajian Demokrasi Tempatan di Kota Yogyakarta dan Kabupaten Jembrana, Bali, Tesis PhD Universiti Sains Malaysa.

Tempo, “Ini Penyebab Kekalahan Bupati Petahana Bengkalis Riau”, dalam https://m.tempo.co/read/news/2015/12/18/058728852/ini-penyebab-kekalahan-bupati-petahana-bengkalis-riau. Diunduh pada 5 Mei 2016.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2016 Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/