Kombinasi untuk Penguatan Demokrasi: Kapasitas Lembaga Representasi Politik di Surakarta oleh PDI-P dan KOMPIP

Aris Setiawan Yodi

Abstract


The dynamicity of democratization in Indonesia has been running for a long time since President Soeharto eras felt and tend to be stagnant if they not deemed declined. Some of democratic institutions that have fundamental role in representing society in public policy legislations are exactly in lower point. This research was conducted to map the representation of capacity for formal and informal institution of democracy. How the capacity for representation formal and informal representation institutions in Surakarta? Through the PDI-P and KOMPIP Solo, two important institution which role the democratization process in Surakarta. Hopefully, it can be used as a reference to start cooperation between democratic institutions. This research is intended to expose the collaboration between formal and informal institutions that has different strengths and weaknesses among others. PDI-P has settle form of political capacity and big masses. Meanwhile, the capacity of KOMPIP is very technocratic, which is seen from some training efforts and empowerment of citizens with hard skill and soft skill things. It indicates, if the two institutions with different characters are able to cooperate well, it will guarantee the democratic life in Indonesia.


Keywords


Democracy; Representation; Surakarta; PDI-P Surakarta; KOMPIP Solo

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmadi, Rulam. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Ardianto, H. T. (2011). Pembentukan Struktur Negosiasi Kota Surakarta: Kritik Nalar Best Practices dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik), 15(2), 124-139.

Arif, Akbarudin dan Baruno, Suryo. (2009). Berguru Advokasi Kepada Forum Warga Solo: Kompip.

Detik.com. PDIP Masih Unggul di Solo, diakses melalui news.detik.com/berita/127210/pdip- masih-unggul-di-solo tanggal 25 Maret 2016.

Diamond, L. J., & Morlino, L. (2004). An overview. Journal of democracy, 15(4), 20-31.

Hanif, Hasrul dkk. (2013). Survey Terhadap Pakar Tentang Demokrasi di Indonesia: Panduan Substansi. Yogyakarta: PWD UGM dan University Of Oslo.

Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on politics, 2(4), 725-740.

Huda, Eko. 2012. Viva.co.id: Penggusuran Damai PKL Ala Satpol PP Solo. Diakses melalui http://fokus.news.viva.co.id/news/read/279899-pesan-damai-dari-satpol-pp-solo tanggal 1 April 2016.

Kaho, Josef R. (2012). Analisis Hubungan Pusat dan Daerah di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: POLGOV UGM.

KPU Surakarta. (2016). Data diolah dari Sub Bagian Teknis Pemilu dan Hubungan Partisipasi Masyarakat.

Lay, C. (2013). From Populism to Democratic Polity: Problems and Challenges in Solo, Indonesia. In Democratization in the Global South (pp. 254-276). Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Lay, C. (2017). Political linkages between CSOs and parliament in Indonesia: a case study of political linkages in drafting the Aceh Governance Law. Asian Journal of Political Science, 25(1), 130-150.

Shiraishi, T., & Farid, H. (1977). Zaman bergerak: radikalisme rakyat di Jawa 1912-1926. Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Paskarina, Caroline dkk. (2015). Berebut Kontrol Atas Kesejahteraan: Kasus-Kasus Politisasi Demokrasi di Tingkat Lokal.Yogyakarta: Polgov UGM.

Poltracking Indonesia. 2015. Refleksi 17 Tahun Reformasi, diakses 5 Februari 2016, dari www.poltracking.com.

Presidenri.go.id. 2016. Prioritas Kaum Marjinal. Diakses melalui http://presidenri.go.id/prioritas/kaum-marjinal.html tanggal 23 Juni 2016.

Rozaki, Abdur dkk. 2014. Menuju Representasi Substantif: Potret Representasi Konstituensi dan Komunikasi Politik Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah. Yogyakarta: IRE

Savirani, Amalinda dkk. (2013). Ringkasan Eksekutif Hasil Survei Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: PWD UGM dan UiO

Simanjuntak, B. A. (Ed.). (2013). Dampak otonomi daerah di Indonesia: merangkai sejarah politik dan pemerintahan Indonesia. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Sunaryo, Arie. 2014. www.merdeka.com: Megawati Kumpulkan Kader PDIP di Solo, diakses melalui http://www.merdeka.com/politik/megawati-kumpulkan-kader-pdip-di-solo.html tanggal 26 Maret 2016.

Talkshow Kick Andy, Metro TV: 23 april 2016.Tim Peneliti Fisipol UGM. (2014). Laporan Penelitian Publik Distrust. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada

Trnquist, O. (2013). Assessing dynamics of democratisation: Transformative politics, new institutions, and the case of Indonesia. Springer.

Trnquist, O., Webster, N., & Stokke, K. (Eds.). (2009). Rethinking popular representation. Springer.

TribunSolo. 2016. http://solotribunnews.com: Aktivitas Unik Walikota Solo Saat Car Free Day. Diakses melalui http://solo.tribunnews.com/2016/04/10/aktivitas-unik-wali-kota-solo-saat- car-free-day tanggal 15 April 2016.

Wawancara dengan Akbarudin Arif, Aktivis Kompip Solo dan mantan Direktur Kompip Solo, taggal 2 April 2016.

Wawancara dengan Eko, Aktivis Kompip Solo dan saat ini menjabat sebagai Direktur Kompip Solo, tanggal 12 April 2016.Wawancara dengan Putut Gunawan, Wakil Ketua Umum Bidang Pemenangan Pemilu, DPC PDI-P Surakarta, tanggal 8 April 2016.

www.erepublik.com. 2013. Kaum Marjinal Adalah Kita. Diakses melalui http://www.erepublik.com/id/article/-sosialist-ids-kaum-marjinal-adalah-tanggungjawab-kita- 2259034/1/20.

www.joglosemar.co 2015. Ini susunan pengurus DPC PDI Perjuangan Kota Solo yang Baru. Diakses melalui http://joglosemar.co/2015/03/ini-susunan-pengurus-dpc-pdi-perjuangan- kota-solo-yang-baru.html tanggal 26 Maret 2016.

www.kbbi.web.id diakses tanggal 15 Januari 2016.

www.pdiperjuangan.id, diakses melalui www.pdiperjuangan.id tanggal 26 Maret 2016.

www.pwd.polgov.id, Data Compilation Surakarta, diakses tanggal 15 Januari 2016.

www.surakarta.go.id, diakses tanggal 8 Maret 2016.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpi.v2i2.9397

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2017 Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/