Indonesian High School Students’ Perception of Scientific Experiment Using Network Analysis: Differences between Science and Humanities Group

R. Q. Aini, Y. Sya’bandari, A. N. Rusmana, J. K. Lee, S. Shin, M. Ha


Understanding what students know about the scientific experiment is essential for their metacognition and their understanding of scientific inquiry. A total of 425 Indonesian high school students participated in this study. Using an open-ended question, this study examined science and humanities group students’ perception of a scientific experiment by their narrative explanations. Language network analysis method was used to measure and visualize their perception by examining the relationship between each word of response and its patterns underlying the network. After the process of network analysis, nodes “prove”, “observation”, “problem” “hypothesis” only found in science students group while nodes “new” “object” “try” “test” found in humanities students group. This result also perceived that science students group considered a scientific experiment as an inquiry process while humanities students were more likely into the discovery process. The result of this study could support how scientific experiment as a learning activity was taken differently in science and humanities class in high school.


experiment, Semantic Network Analysis (SNA), scientific, students’ perception

Full Text:



Armağan, F. Ö. (2017). Cognitive Structures of Elementary School Students: What is Science?. European Journal of Physics Education, 6(2), 54-73.

Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping Written Knowledge: the Genre and Activity of. Communication in Linguistics-* T.

Bodin, M. (2012).Mapping University Students’ Epistemic Framing of Computational Physics Using Network Analysis. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8(1), 010115.

Bogen, J. (2009). Theory and Observation in Science.

Brewe, E., Kramer, L., & Sawtelle, V. (2012). Investigating Student Communities with Network Analysis of Interactions in a Physics Learning Center. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8(1), 010101.

Bruun, J., & Brewe, E. (2013). Talking and Learning Physics: Predicting Future Grades From Network Measures and Force Concept Inventory Pretest Scores. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 9(2), 020109.

Carolan, B. V. (2013). Social Network Analysis and Education: Theory, Methods & Applications. Sage Publications.

diSessa, A. (2013). A Bird’s-Eye View of the “Pieces” V.“Coherence” Controversy. Vosniadou, S. International Handbook on Conceptual Change, 31-49.

Drieger, P. (2013). Semantic Network Analysis as a Method for Visual Text Analytics. Procedia-Social And Behavioral Sciences, 79, 4-17.

Elgin, M., & Sober, E. (2017). Popper’s Shifting Appraisal of Evolutionary Theory. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 7(1), 31-55.

Evans, J. S. B. (2013). The Psychology of Deductive Reasoning (Psychology revivals). New York: Psychology Press.

Giurgea, M., &Georgescu, L. (2012). Redefining the Role of Experiment in Bacon’s Natural History: How Baconian was Descartes Before Emerging from His Cocoon?. Early Science And Medicine, 17(1-2), 158-180.

Glass, D. J. (2010). A Critique of the Hypothesis, and a Defense of the Question, as a Framework for Experimentation. Clinical Chemistry, 56(7), 1080-1085.

Gooding, D. C. (2012). Experiment and the Making of Meaning: Human Agency in Scientific Observation and Experiment (Vol. 5). Springer Science & Business Media.

Gyllenpalm, J., & Wickman, P. O. (2011).“Experiments” and the Inquiry Emphasis Conflation in Science Teacher Education. Science Education, 95(5), 908-926.

Hairida, H. (2016). The Effectiveness of Using Inquiry-Based Natural Science Module with Authentic Assessment to Improve the Critical Thinking and Inquiry Skills of Junior High School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 209-215.

Harré, R. (2002). Great Scientific Experiments: Twenty Experiments That Changed Our View of the World. Courier Corporation.

Jackson, M., & Cox, D. R. (2013). The Principles of Experimental Design and their Application in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 27-49.

Lee, J. K., & Ha, M. (2012). Semantic Network Analysis of Science Gifted Middle School Students’ Understanding of Fact, Hypothesis, Theory, Law, and Scientificness. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(5), 823-840.

Lee, Jun-Ki & Shin, Sein& Ha, Minsu. (2015). Comparing the Structure of Secondary School Students’ Perception of the Meaning of ‘Experiment’ in Science and Biology. Journal of The Korean Association for Science Education. 35. 997-1006.

Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2015). The Development of Scientific Thinking. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, 1-44.

Liu, S. Y., Lin, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). College Students’ Scientific Epistemological Views and Thinking Patterns in Socioscientific Decision Making. Science Education, 95(3), 497-517.

Longo, C. M. (2011). Designing Inquiry-Oriented Science Lab Activities: Teachers Can Create Inquiry-Oriented Science Lab Activities that Make Real-World Connections. Middle School Journal, 43(1), 6-15.

Malik, S. (2017). Observation Versus Experiment: An Adequate Framework for Analysing Scientific Experimentation?. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 48(1), 71-95.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Silabus Mata Pelajaran IPA: Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Science Subject Syllabus: Junior High School). Jakarta, Indonesia: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

National Research Council.(1996). National Science Education Standards.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (2002). Scientific Research In Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. 2016. PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Oshima, J., Oshima, R., & Matsuzawa, Y. (2012). Knowledge Building Discourse Explorer: A Social Network Analysis Application for Knowledge Building Discourse. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 903-921.

Palmer, D. H. (2009). Student Interest Generated during an Inquiry Skills Lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 147-165.

Park, K. J., Chung, D. H., Ha, M., & Lee, J. K. (2014). High School Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions on the Purpose of Science Learning based on the Semantic Network Analysis. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 34(6), 571-581.

Peters-Burton, E., & Baynard, L. R. (2013). Network Analysis of Beliefs about the Scientific Enterprise: A Comparison of Scientists, Middle School Science Teachers and Eighth-Grade Science Students. International Journal of science education, 35(16), 2801-2837.

Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2009). The Development of Dynamic Inquiry Performances within an Open Inquiry Setting: A Comparison to Guided Inquiry Setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1137-1160.

Sandi-Urena, S., Cooper, M., & Stevens, R. (2012). Effect of Cooperative Problem-Based Lab Instruction on Metacognition and Problem-Solving Skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(6), 700-706.

Schizas, D., Katrana, E., & Stamou, G. (2013). Introducing Network Analysis into Science Education: Methodological Research Examining Secondary School Students’ Understanding of” Decomposition”. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(1), 175-198.

Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment Methodology: Underlying Principles and Essential Elements. Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education, 267-306.

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st-Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110-116.

Van der Hulst, R. C. (2009). Introduction to Social Network Analysis (SNA) as an Investigative tool. Trends in Organized Crime, 12(2), 101-121.

Wong, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2009). From the Horse’s Mouth: What Scientists Say about Scientific Investigation and Scientific Knowledge. Science Education, 93(1), 109-130.

Zeineddin, A., & Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. (2010). Scientific Reasoning and Epistemological Commitments: Coordination of Theory and Evidence Among College Science Students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(9), 1064-1093.


  • There are currently no refbacks.