The Implementation of Science, Technology and Society Environment (STSE)-Based Learning for Developing Pre-Service General Science Teachers’ Understanding of the Nature of Science by Empirical Evidence

S. Gathong, S. Chamrat


The objective of this research was to study the outcomes of teaching method based on Science, Technology, Society, and Environment (STSE) in enhancing the nature of science understanding, emphasizing the empirical evidence among 23 pre-service general science teachers at one of Rajabhat Universities in the upper northern region, Thailand. The samples were selected using the purposive random sampling technique from a population of bachelor education program students who enrolled in the second semester in the academic year of 2016. The research instruments consisted of questionnaires and ten learning management plans based on the concept of Science, Technology, Society, and Environment (STSE) emphasizing on empirical evidence covering ten environmental issues in the upper northern region. Such learning managements have steps for students to utilize empirical evidence to create the nature of science understanding.  Mean and standard deviation were applied to data analysis, then the results were presented descriptively. The research found that the pre-service teachers had a better understanding of the nature of science after studying with the statistical significance and were satisfied with the implementation of the teaching method.


nature of science, nature of science understanding, scientific evidence, Science, Technology and Society Environment (STSE)

Full Text:



Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Nature of science in science education: Toward a coherent framework for synergistic research and development. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1041-1060). Springer, Dordrecht.

Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Teaching with and about the nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 22(9), 2087-2107.

Akcay, H., & Yager, R. E. (2010). The impact of a science/technology/society teaching approach on student learning in five domains. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 602-611.

Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518-542.

Allchin, D. (2014). From science studies to scientific literacy: A view from the classroom. Science & Education, 23(9), 1911-1932.

American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (2009). Benchmark online. Retrieve from

Bell, R.L., Sterrling, D., Maeng, J.,& Peters, E.(2010). Teaching about scientific inquiry and nature of science. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the Virginia Association of Science Teachers, Hampton, VA.

Clough, M. (2018). Teaching and learning about the nature of science. Science & Education, 27(1-2), 1-5.

Clough, M. P. (2011). Teaching and assessing the nature of science: how to effectively incorporate the nature of science in your classroom. The Science Teacher, 78(6), 56–60.

Faikhamta, C. (2013). The development of in-service science teachers’ understandings of and orientations to teaching the nature of science within a PCK-based NOS course. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 847-869.

Gathong, S., & Chamrat, S. (2019, March). Pre-service teachers’ teaching practice of science technology society environment (STSE) learning approach integrated nature of science during internships. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2081, No. 1, p. 030004). AIP Publishing.

Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science education, 95(1), 145-167.

Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2011). Models of Teaching (8th Edition). Boston: Pearson Education.

Kampourakis, K. (2016). The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 667-682.

Lalitanurak, P., & Faikhamta, C. (2011). Views on the nature of science of student teachers in the project for the Promotion of Science and Mathematics Talented Teachers (PSMT). Songklanakarin Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 17(5), 223-254.

Lederman, N. G. (2013). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 845-894). Routledge.

Lederman, N. G., & Abell, S. K. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2). Routledge.

Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 1(3), 138-147.

Magee, P. A., & Flessner, R. (2011). Five Strategies to Support all Teachers: Suggestions to Get Off the Slippery Slope of” Cookbook” Science Teaching. Science & Children, 48(7), 34-36.

Mansour, N. (2009). Science-technology-society (STS) a new paradigm in science education. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29(4), 287-297.

Ministry of Education. (2017). Indicators and concepts for science subjects (B.E.2560 edition) according to Basic education curriculum B.E. 2551. Bangkok: Chumnumsahakorn Publishing.

Nation Science Teacher Association [NSTA]. (1993). Science/technology/society :a new effort for providing appropriate science for all. Washington D.C.: The Nation Science Teacher Association.

National Research Council [NRC]. (1996).National Science Education Standards. Washington D.C.: The National Academic Press.

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: for states, by states. Washington: The National Academies Press.

Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on. Science education, 95(4), 601-626.

Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2014). Tensions and Opportunities: A Baseline Study of Teachers’ Views of Environmental Education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(3), 265-283.

Pisa, O. E. C. D. (2015). Draft science framework. Retrieved from http://www. OECD. org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft PISA 2015 Science Framework. Pdf.

Solomon, J. (1993). Teaching science, technology and society. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press

Vayssettes, S. (Ed.). (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic and financial literacy. OECD Publishing.

Yager, R. E. (Ed.). (1992). The status of science-technology-society reform efforts around the world. ICASE.

Yoruk, N., Morgil, İ., & Secken, N. (2009). The Effects of Science, Technology, Society and Environment (STSE) Education on Students’ Career Planning. Online Submission, 6(8), 68-74.

Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58


  • There are currently no refbacks.