Can Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity be Taught to Indonesian High School Students?

Y. S. Dua, D. G. Blair, T. Kaur, R. K. Choudhary

Abstract

The detections of gravitational waves, which culminated in the 2017 physics Noble Prize award have again confirmed the triumph of the theory of general relativity. This theory, together with quantum mechanics, forms the backbones of our modern understanding of the world and significantly contributes to modern technologies we are using today. Despite the importance of these theories, they are still rarely part of high school physics curricula worldwide, including the Indonesian physics curriculum, due to assumptions that these theories are too difficult for students to grasp. However, there has been a growing interest to bring these theories to younger students and general public and there is growing evidence that appropriate teaching can result in measurable learning. The purpose of this research was to explore the impact of activity-based learning using models and analogies on high school students’ conceptual understanding of general relativity related concepts. It was conducted in one class of 31 students who participated in a three-week period program. Testing of their conceptual understanding used identical pre/post-tests. The results indicated a strong and statistically significant improvement in students’ conceptual understanding with a large effect size. Interestingly, the results showed that the change in conceptual understanding to physics of girls was higher than boys.

 

 

Keywords

general relativity; activity based learning; models and analogies; conceptual understanding

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aubusson, P. J., Aubusson, P., Harrison, A. G., & Ritchie, S. M. (Eds.). (2006). Metaphor and analogy in science education (Vol. 30). Springer Science & Business Media.

Baldy, E. (2007). A new educational perspective for teaching gravity. International Journal of Science Education, 29(14), 1767-1788.

Blair, D. (2012). Testing the theory: taking Einstein to primary schools. The conversation.

Blair, D., Henriksen, E. K., & Hendry, M. (2016). Why don’t we teach Einstein’s theories in schools. The conversation.

Buabeng, I., Conner, L., & Winter, D. (2016). Physics teachers’ views on their initial teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(7), 3.

Budiyanto, J. (2009). Fisika: Untuk SMA/MA Kelas XII. Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Jakarta, 298.

Cheng, T. P. (2009). Relativity, gravitation and cosmology: a basic introduction (Vol. 11). Oxford University Press.

Choudhary, R. K., Foppoli, A., Kaur, T., Blair, D. G., Zadnik, M., & Meagher, R. (2018). Can a short intervention focused on gravitational waves and quantum physics improve students’ understanding and attitude?. Physics Education, 53(6), 065020.

Choudhary, R., Kraus, U., Kersting, M., Blair, D., Zahn, C., Zadnik, M., & Meagher, R. (2019). Einsteinian Physics in the Classroom: Integrating Physical and Digital Learning Resources in the Context of an International Research Collaboration. The Physics Educator, 1(04), 1950016.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences {Ind cd. Hillsdale. NJ: Erihaum.

Coll, R. K., France, B., & Taylor, I. (2005). The role of models/and analogies in science education: implications from research. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 183-198.

Henriksen, E. K., Bungum, B., Angell, C., Tellefsen, C. W., Frågåt, T., & Bøe, M. V. (2014). Relativity, quantum physics and philosophy in the upper secondary curriculum: challenges, opportunities and proposed approaches. Physics Education, 49(6), 678.

Huggins, E. (2018). Curved spacetime (gravity) tells mass (energy) how to move. The Physics Teacher, 56(9), 591-595.

JonÄne, L. (2015). Using Analogies in Teaching Physics: A Study on Latvian Teachers’ Views and Experience. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(2), 53-73.

Kanginan, M. (2004). Seribu pena fisika untuk SMA kelas XII. Jakarta Erlangga.

Kaur, T., Blair, D., MoSschilla, J., Stannard, W., & Zadnik, M. (2017). Teaching Einsteinian physics at schools: part 1, models and analogies for relativity. Physics Education, 52(6), 065012.

Kaur, T., Blair, D., Moschilla, J., & Zadnik, M. (2017). Teaching Einsteinian physics at schools: part 2, models and analogies for quantum physics. Physics Education, 52(6), 065013.

Kaur, T., Blair, D., Moschilla, J., Stannard, W., & Zadnik, M. (2017). Teaching Einsteinian physics at schools: part 3, review of research outcomes. Physics Education, 52(6), 065014.

Kersting, M., Henriksen, E. K., Bøe, M. V., & Angell, C. (2018). General relativity in upper secondary school: Design and evaluation of an online learning environment using the model of educational reconstruction. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 010130.

Kersting, M., & Steier, R. (2018). Understanding curved spacetime. Science & Education, 27(7-8), 593-623.

Made, A. I., & Setiawan, H. (2008). Fisika Untuk SMA dan MA Kelas XII. Jakarta: Penerbit Piranti Darma Kalokatama.

Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual 4th edition: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS version 18. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press. Retrieved on from http://www. allenandunwin. com/spss.

Pitts, M., Venville, G., Blair, D., & Zadnik, M. (2014). An exploratory study to investigate the impact of an enrichment program on aspects of Einsteinian physics on year 6 students. Research in Science Education, 44(3), 363-388.

Ryston, M. (2019, August). Interactive animations as a tool in teaching general relativity to upper secondary school students. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1286, No. 1, p. 012049). IOP Publishing.

Stannard, W. B. (2018). Why do things fall? How to explain why gravity is not a force. Physics Education, 53(2), 025007.

Velentzas, A., & Halkia, K. (2013). The use of thought experiments in teaching physics to upper secondary-level students: Two examples from the theory of relativity. International Journal of Science Education, 35(18), 3026-3049.

Walwema, G. B., French, D. A., Verley, J. D., & Burrows, A. C. (2016). Is classical mechanics a prerequisite for learning physics of the 20th century?. Physics Education, 51(6), 065022.

Weinberg, S. (1972). Gravitation and cosmology: principles and applications of the general theory of relativity.

Yavaş, P. Ü., & Kizilcik, H. Ş. (2016). Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Difficulties in Understanding Special Relativity Topics. European Journal of Physics Education, 7(1), 13-24.

Zahn, C., & Kraus, U. (2014). Sector models—A toolkit for teaching general relativity: I. Curved spaces and spacetimes. European Journal of Physics, 35(5), 055020.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.