Assessing Prospective Biology Teachers (PBTs) Perceptions on Thinking as a 21st Century Skill: A Case Study at Islamic University

M. Haviz, L. Lufri, I. M. Maris


The explanatory mixed-method was conducted to assess prospective biology teachers’ (PBTs) perceptions on thinking as 21st century skills. Data were collected using a quantitative survey method, and an interview with PBTs from Islamic University. 168 (14 men and 154 women) of 195 PBTs participated in filling out the questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of 24 statements of aspects of critical thinking, problem-solving, creativity, metacognition of the 21st century skill. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and alpha Cronbach tests were used to determine the quality of the instrument. Statistic descriptive, ANOVA, and correlation tests were conducted to analyze the quantitative data. Triangulation was conducted on the results of the interview. The results of the study indicate that (a) most male and female PBTs at Islamic universities have high skills in critical thinking and metacognition; (b) most male and female PBTs at Islamic universities have insufficient skills in problemsolving and creativity skills; (c) the results of this study also showed that there is no relationship between gender and PBTs skills. This study suggested that teachers and education managers in Islamic universities need to apply integrative learning by paying attention to the skills needed by PBTs. Learning applied in classrooms should be based on 21st century skills.


prospective biology teachers (PBTs); thinking; 21st century skill

Full Text:



Afandi, A., Sajidan, S., Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2019). Development Frameworks of the Indonesian Partnership 21st-Century Skills Standards for Prospective Science Teachers: A Delphi Study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 89-100.

Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. M. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ TPACK competencies for spreadsheet integration: insights from a mathematics-specific instructional technology course. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(5), 605-625.

Alfarhan, U. F., & Dauletova, V. (2019). Revisiting the gender academic achievement gap: evidence from a unique environment. Gender and Education, 31(7), 827-848.

Argaw, A. S., Haile, B. B., Ayalew, B. T., & Kuma, S. G. (2016). The effect of problem based learning (PBL) instruction on students’ motivation and problem solving skills of physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 857-871.

Ashraf, K. A. (2018). The relationship between Jordanian students’ 21st century skills (Cs21) and academic achievement in science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(2), 82-94.

Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2017). Investigating variables predicting Turkish preâ€service teachers’ integration of ICT into teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 552-570.

Bahri, A., & Corebima, A. D. (2015). The contribution of learning motivation and metacognitive skill on cognitive learning outcome of students within different learning strategies. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(4), 487-500.

Bakır, S., & Öztekin, E. (2014). Creative thinking levels of preservice science teachers in terms of different variables. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(2), 231-242.

Chai, C. S., Deng, F., Tsai, P. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Assessing multidimensional students’ perceptions of twenty-first-century learning practices. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(3), 389-398.

Chang, P. S., Lee, S. H., & Wen, M. L. (2020). Metacognitive inquiry activities for instructing the central dogma concept:‘button code’and ‘beaded bracelet making’. Journal of Biological Education, 54(1), 47-62.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. L. (2018). Integrated curriculum as an effective way to teach 21st century capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 31-50.

Duran, M., & Dökme, İ. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student’s critical-thinking

Fisher, A. (2011). Critical thinking: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Fitriani, H., Asy'ari, M., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2019). Exploring the Prospective Teachers’ Critical Thinking and Critical Analysis Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(3), 379-390.

Fonseca, M. J., Costa, P., Lencastre, L., & Tavares, F. (2012). Multidimensional analysis of high-school students' perceptions about biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 46(3), 129-139.

Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st century skills: What are they and how do we assess them?. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245-249.

Greenstein, L. M. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. Corwin Press.

Greiff, S., & Kyllonen, P. (2016). Contemporary assessment challenges: the measurement of 21st century skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 243-244.

Hadjichambis, A. C., Georgiou, Y., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Kyza, E. A., & Mappouras, D. (2016). Investigating the effectiveness of an inquiry-based intervention on human reproduction in relation to students’ gender, prior knowledge and motivation for learning in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 50(3), 261-274.

Haviz, M. (2016). Designing and developing the integrated learning model on embryology. Transylvanian Review, (4), 1043-1052.

Haviz, M., Karomah, H., Delfita, R., Umar, M. I. A., & Maris, I. M. (2018). Revisiting generic science skills as 21st century skills on biology learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3), 355-363.

Haviz, M., Lufri, L., Fauzan, A., & Effendi, Z. M. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Integratif Pada Biologi Perkembangan Hewan: Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan. Ta'dib, 15(1), 1-14.

Holland, D. D., & Piper, R. T. (2014). A technology integration education (TIE) model: Millennial preservice teachers' motivations about technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) competencies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(3), 257-294.

Hudha, M. N., & Batlolona, J. R. (2017). How are the physics critical thinking skills of the students taught by using inquiry-discovery through empirical and theorethical overview?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 691-697.

Jia, Y., Oh, Y. J., Sibuma, B., LaBanca, F., & Lorentson, M. (2016). Measuring twenty-first century skills: development and validation of a scale for in-service and pre-service teachers. Teacher Development, 20(2), 229-252.

Larson, L. C., & Miller, T. N. (2011). 21st century skills: Prepare students for the future. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(3), 121-123.

Listiana, L., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., & Suarsini, E. (2016). Empowering students’ metacognitive skills through new teaching strategy (group investigation integrated with think talk write) in biology classroom. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(3), 391.

Lucas, B. (2016). A five-dimensional model of creativity and its assessment in schools. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 278-290.

Maryuningsih, Y., Hidayat, T., Riandi, R., & Rustaman, N. Y. (2019, February). Critical thinking skills of prospective biology teacher on the chromosomal basic of inheritance learning through online discussion forums. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157, No. 2, p. 022090). IOP Publishing.

Nawani, J., von Kotzebue, L., Spangler, M., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2019). Engaging students in constructing scientific explanations in biology classrooms: a lesson-design model. Journal of Biological Education, 53(4), 378-389.

Pedersen, J. M. (2019). Gender Achievement Gaps: Reexamining the Transformational Debate. Childhood Education, 95(5), 74-78.

Prokop, P., & FanÄoviÄová, J. (2019). The perception of toxic and non-toxic plants by children and adolescents with regard to gender: implications for teaching botany. Journal of Biological Education, 53(4), 463-473.

Sang, G., Liang, J. C., Chai, C. S., Dong, Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). Teachers’ actual and preferred perceptions of twenty-first century learning competencies: a Chinese perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(3), 307-317.

Sladek, R. M., Bond, M. J., & Phillips, P. A. (2010). Age and gender differences in preferences for rational and experiential thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 907-911.

Sondergeld, T. A., & Johnson, C. C. (2019). Development and validation of a 21st century Skills Assessment: Using an iterative multimethod approach. School Science and Mathematics, 119(6), 312-326.

Å pernjak, A., & Å orgo, A. (2018). Differences in acquired knowledge and attitudes achieved with traditional, computer-supported and virtual laboratory biology laboratory exercises. Journal of Biological Education, 52(2), 206-220.

Suhr, D. D. (2018). Exploratory of confirmatory factor analysis? Statistics and data analysis. Paper 200-31.

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296.

Teo, P. (2019). Teaching for the 21st century: A case for dialogic pedagogy. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 170-178.

Wang, Y., Lavonen, J., & Tirri, K. (2018). Aims for learning 21st century competencies in national primary science curricula in China and Finland. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2081-2095.

Warren, F., Mason-Apps, E., Hoskins, S., Azmi, Z., & Boyce, J. (2018). The role of implicit theories, age, and gender in the creative performance of children and adults. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 98-109.

Yerdelen-Damar, S., Özdemir, Ö. F., & Ünal, C. (2015). Pre-service Physics Teachers' Metacognitive Knowledge about Their Instructional Practices. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5).

Zainuddin, Z., & Attaran, M. (2016). Malaysian students’ perceptions of flipped classroom: A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 660-670.

Zainuddin, Z., & Perera, C. J. (2019). Exploring students’ competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(1), 115-126.


  • There are currently no refbacks.