MODEL INTEGRASI ATRIBUT ASESMEN FORMATIF (IAAF) DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI SEL UNTUK MENGEMBANGKAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN BERPIKIR ANALITIK MAHASISWA CALON GURU

S. Saptono, N.Y. Rustaman, Saefudin -, A. Widodo

Abstract

Dalam studi ini dikembangkan model integrasi atribut asesmen formatif (IAAF) dalam pembelajaran Biologi Sel untuk mengembangkan kemampuan penalaran dan berpikir analitik mahasiswa calon guru Biologi. Atribut asesmen formatif yang diintegrasikan adalah collaboration, self-assessment, peer-assessment, dan feedback & learning progression. Model yang dikembangkan mencakup pembelajaran interaktif, pembuatan bagan konsep, dan reviu artikel jurnal internasional. Dimensi yang diukur dalam studi ini adalah perkembangan kemampuan mahasiswa membuat bagan konsep, kemampuan mahasiswa melakukan reviu artikel, dan kemampuan penalaran dan berpikir analitik mahasiswa. Hasil studi mengindikasikan bahwa Model IAAF dapat mengembangkan kemampuan penalaran dan berpikir analitik mahasiswa.

 


In this study developed a model of integration of formative assessment attributes (IAAF) in Cell Biology learning to develop reasoning skills and analytical thinking Biology student teachers. Attributes of formative assessment that  integrated is collaboration, self-assessment, peer-assessment, and feedback & learning progression. The model developed includes interactive learning, graphing concepts, and review articles of international journal. Dimensions measured in this study is the development of students’ ability to make a chart of concept, the ability of student conduct review of articles, and the ability to reason and think analytically students. The study results indicate that the IAAF model can develop reasoning skills and analytic thinking students.

Keywords

IAAF Model; Cell Biology; reasoning skills; analytical thinking

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bao, L. et al. 2009. Learning and scientific reasoning. Science, 323,586-587, 30 January 2009.

Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O. & Orion, N. 2006. Development of System Thinking Skills in the Context of Earth System Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 42 (5): 518–560 .

Brookhart, S.M. 2010. How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. Virginia: ASCD.

Crowe, A., Dirks, C. & Wenderoth, M.P. 2008. Biology in Bloom: implementing Bloom’s taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education. 7: 368-381, Winter 2008.

Fencl, H.S. 2010. Development of students’ critical-reasoning skills through content-focused activities in a general education course. Journal of College Science Teaching. May/June 2010: 55-62.

Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. & Marshall, S. 2009. A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice. New York: Routledge.

Furtak, E.M. & Ruiz-Primo, M.A. 2008. Making student’ thinking explicit in writing and discussion: an analysis of formative assessment prompts. Science Education. February, 799-823.

Gotwals, A.W. & Songer, N.B. 2009. Reasoning up and down a food chain: using an assessment framework to investigate students’ middle knowledge. Science Education. 94: 259-28.

Hall, K. & Burke, W.M. 2004. Making Formative Assessment Work. London: McGraw Hill-Education.

Janssen, F.J.J.M., Tigelaar, D.E.H, & Verloop, N. 2009. Developing biology lessons aimed at teaching for understanding: a domain-specific heuristic for student teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 20: 1-20.

Kitchen, E. et al. 2003. Teaching cell biology in the large-enrollment classroom: methods to promote analytical thinking and assessment of their effectiveness. Cell Biology Education. 2: 180–194, Fall 2003.

Lawson, A.E., Banks, D.L. & Logvin, M. 2007. Self-efficacy, reasoning ability, and achievement in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 4 (5): 706-724.

Lynd-Balta, E. 2006. Using literature and innovative assessments to ignite interest and cultivate critical thinking skills in an undergraduate neuroscience course. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 5: 167–174, Summer 2006.

McManus, S. 2008. “Attributes of effective formative assessment”. Paper prepared for the Formative Assessment for Teachers and Students (FAST). State Collaborative on Assessment and Student Standards (SCASS) of the CCSSO (The Council of Chief State School Officers). Department of Public Instruction.

National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Noblitt, L., Vance, D.E. & Smith, M.L.D. 2010. A comparison of case study and traditional teaching methods for improvement of oral communication and critical-thinking skills. Journal of College Science Teaching. May/June 2010, 26-32.

Odom, A.L. & Kelly, P.V. 2001. Integrating concept mapping and the learning cycle to teach diffusion and osmosis concepts to high school biology students. Journal of Science Education. 85 (6): 615-635.

Quitadamo, I.J. & Kurtz, M.J. 2007. Learning to improve: using writing to increase critical thinking performance in general education biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 6: 140–154, Summer 2007.

Reynolds, J. & Moskovitz, C. 2008. Calibrated peer review assignments in science courses: are they designed to promote critical thinking and writing skills? Journal of College Science Teaching, Nov/Dec 2008, 60-66.

Saptono, S. & Rustaman, N.Y. 2011. Undergraduate students’ reasoning and analytical thinking skills in cell biology. Proceeding International Seminar of Science Education. Sekolah Pascasarjana UPI, 12 November 2011.

Smith, M.K., Wood, W. B. & Knight, J. K. 2008. The genetics concept assessment: a new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 7: 422–430, Winter 2008.

Tanner, K. & Allen, D. 2004. Approaches to biology teaching and learning: from assays to assessments—on collecting evidence in science teaching. Cell Biology Education. 3: 69–74, Summer 2004.

Torrance, H. & Pryor, J. 2002. Investigating Formative Assessment: Teaching, Learning and Assessment in the Classroom. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Wilson, C.D. 2006. Assessing students’ ability to trace matter in dynamic systems in cell biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 5: 323–331, Winter 2006.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.