S. R. Yunus, I. G. M. Sanjaya, B. Jatmiko


Penelitian bertujuan untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar fisika siswa auditorik dengan mengimplemetasikan pembelajaran fisika berbasis guided inquiry. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) keterlaksanaan pembelajaran berjalan dengan baik sesuai dengan RPP, (2) peningkatan hasil belajar kognitif baik produk maupun proses siswa meningkat dengan baik, dan (3) respons siswa terhadap pembelajaran positif. Berdasarkan hasil temuan dapat disimpulkan bahwa implementasi pembelajaran fisika berbasis guided inquiry dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa auditorik.


The aim of this study was to increase learning outcomes by implementing learning physics based on guided inquiry. The results showed that (1) learning process was good in accordance with RPP, (2) the learning outcomes of product and process increase effectively, (3) student respond to learning was positive. According to the findings above it could be conclude that the implementation of learning physics based on guided inquiry is able to increase learning outcomes of auditory learner.


Guided Inquiry; Auditory Learner; Learning outcomes

Full Text:



Bilgin, M. 2009. The effects of guided inquiry instruction incorporating a cooperative learning approach on university students’ achievement of acid and bases concepts and attitude toward guided inquiry instruction. Academic Journals. Scientific Research and Essay. Vol.4 (10): 1038-1046.

Brickman. 2009. Effect of Inquiry-based learning on Students’ science literacy skill and confidence. International journal for the scholarship of teaching and learning. Vol. 3 (2).

DePorter & Hernacki. 2006. Quantum Learning. PT. Mizan Pustaka: Bandung.

Jabot, M & Kautz,C. H. 2003. A model for preparing pre service physics teachers using inquiry-based methods. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. Vol. 1 (4).

Minderhout & Loertscher. 2007. Lecture-free biochemistry a process oriented guided inquiry approach. Biochemistry And Molecular Biology Education. Vol. 35 (3): 172–180.

Nugraheni, E. 2006. Gaya Belajar dan Strategi Belajar Mahasiswa Jarak Jauh: Kasus di universitas terbuka. Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh. Vol. 7 (1): 68 -82.

Penger, S. 2008. Comparison, validation and implications of learning style theories in higher education in Slovenia: An Experiential And Theoretical Case. International Business & Economics Research. Vol. 7 (12).

Trundle. 2010. The Effect of Guided Inquiry-Based Instruction on Middle School Students’ Understanding of Lunar Concepts. Res SCI Educ. Vol. 40:451–478.

Wenning, C. J. 2005. Levels of inquiry: Levels of inquiry: Hierarchies of pedagogical practices and inquiry processes. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. Vol. 2 (3), Illinois State University Physics Dept.

Wenning, C.J & Wenning, R. 2006. A generic model for inquiry – oriented labs in post secondary introductory Physics. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. Vol. 2 (3), Illinois State University Physics Dept.

Wenning, Carl J. 2007. Assessing inquiry skills as a component of scientific literacy. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. Vol. 5 (4), Illinois State University Physics Dept.

Wenning, Carl J. 2010. Levels of inquiry: Using inquiry spectrum learning sequences to teach science. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. Vol. 4 (2), Illinois State University Physics Dept.

Yunus, S. R. 2012. Learning physics based on guided inquiry for auditory learner at SMA Negeri 18 Surabaya. Proceeding of international seminar ”Sang Guru” dengan tema “Sang Guru for Betterment of Education. Surabaya, 08 September 2012

Zawadzki. 2009. Is process-oriented guided-inquiry learning (POGIL) suitable as a teaching method in Thailand’s higher education? Asian Journal on Education and Learning. Thailand. As. J. Education.Vol. 1(2), 66-74.


  • There are currently no refbacks.