N. Shofiyah, Z. A. I. Supardi, B. Jatmiko


Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengembangkan perangkat pembelajaran menggunakan model 5E untuk meningkatkan keterampilan penalaran ilmiah siswa. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perangkat pembelajaran yang dikembangkan dengan model 5E valid untuk diterapkan di dalam kelas, BAS memiliki keterbacaan yang bagus, keterlaksanaan RPP dikategorikan baik, model pembelajaran 5E secara efektif dapat mening-katkan keterampilan penalaran ilmiah siswa dan siswa memberikan respon yang positif terhadap pembelajaran.


The purpose of this research is to develop the 5E model of learning to improve students’ scientific reasoning skills. The results of this study show that the developed learning model 5E valid to be applied in the classroom, BAS has good readability, keterlaksanaan RPP well categorized, 5E learning model can effectively improve students’ scientific reasoning skills and the students responded positively to the learning.


Scientific reasoning skills; 5E model of instruction

Full Text:



Acisli, S., Yalcin, S. A., & Turgut, U. 2011. Effects of the 5E learning model on students’ academic achievements in movement and force issues. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 15: 2459–2462.

Boddy, N., Watson, K., & Aubusson, P. 2003. A trial of the five es: a referent model for constructivist teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, Kluwer Academic Publisher. Printed in the Netherland. Vol. 33: 27-42.

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J.A., Gardner A., Scotter, P. V., Powell, J.C., Westbrook, A. & andes, N. 2006. The BSCS 5E instructional model: origins and effectiveness. Office Of Science Education National Institutes Of Health. Vol. 3: 1-80.

Dolan, E. & Grady, J. 2009. Recognizing Students’ Scientific Reasoning: A Tool for Categorizing Complexity of Reasoning During Teaching by Inquiry. Journal Science Teacher Education. Vol. 21: 31-55.

Ergin, I. 2008. An example for the effect of 5E Model on the academic success and attitudes levels of students: Inclined projectile motion. Journal of Turkish Science Education. Vol. 5(3): 47-59.

Fraenkel, J. R. Wallen, N. E & Hyun, H. H. 2011. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 8th Ed. Mc GrawHill: United State.

Karplus, R., & Thier, H. 1974. SCIS teacher’s handbook. Berkeler. CA: Science Curriculum Improvement Study.

Karplus, R., et al., 1977. Science teaching and the development of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 14(2): 169-175.

Lawson, A. E., Alkhoury, S., Benford, R., Clark, B. R., & Falconer, K. A. 2000. What kinds of scientific concepts exist? Concept construction and intellectual development in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 37(9): 996-1018.

Metin, M. 2011. Effects of teaching material based 5E Model removed pre-service teachers’ misconceptions about acids-bases. Bulgarian journal of Science and Education Policy. Vol. 5(2): 274-302.

OECD. 2009. Take the Test: Sample Questions from Oecd’s Pisa Assessments. ISBN 978-92-64-05080-8.

Slavin, R. E. 2006. Educational Psychology: Teory and Practice 8th ed. Boston: Pearson.

Thiagarajan, et al. 1974. Instructional Development for Training of Exceptional Children a Sourcebook. Bloomington: Center for Innovation on the Teaching the Handicaped.

Wilson, C., Taylor, J., Kowalski, S., and Carlson, J. 2009. The relative effects of inquiry based and commonplace science teaching on students’ knowledge, reasoning and argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 47 (3): 276-301.


  • There are currently no refbacks.