Increasing Creative Thinking of Students by Learning Organization with STEAM Education

D. N. Ahmad, M. M. Astriani, M. Alfahnum, L. Setyowati


The purpose of this research is to analyze the changes in learning between learning before using the STEAM method and learning after using the STEAM method. Where the researchers analyzed the process of student activities in learning, namely in the course of making learning media to determine the ability of students to think creatively in developing the students' knowledge. In obtaining research data, researchers used an assessment score reference instrument, where the final product assessment was assessed by subject lecturers, learning media expert lecturers, and linguistics (language) lecturers. To find out whether there is a change in the ability to think creatively in each learning process before and after learning, the researcher uses a hypothesis test using the t-test. To find out whether there is a change in ability positively, namely the ability to think creatively in each learning process before and after learning, the researcher uses a hypothesis test using the t-test to find out this. It can be seen from the increase in the average learning outcomes before and after with an increase in the difference of 2.26 from the average before using the STEAM method in learning, which is 78.26. The results of the analysis test explain that the learning method using STEAM in learning has a positive impact on learning where students experience a significant average increase before and after being given learning using the STEAM method by providing hands-on experience through the project work process.


STEAM; creative; learning

Full Text:



Colucci-Gray, L., Burnard, P., Cooke, C., Davies, R., Gray, D., & Trowsdale, J. (2017). Reviewing the potential and challenges of developing STEAM education through creative pedagogies for 21st learning: how can school curricula be broadened towards a more responsive, dynamic, and inclusive form of education?.

Connor, A. M., Karmokar, S., & Whittington, C. (2015). From STEM to STEAM: Strategies for Enhancing Engineering & Technology Education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 5(2).

Daugherty, M. K. (2013). The Prospect of an" A" in STEM Education. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(2).

Fardah, D. K. (2012). Analisis proses dan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam matematika melalui tugas open-ended. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 3(2), 91-99.

Gates, A. E. (2017). Benefits of a STEAM collaboration in Newark, New Jersey: Volcano simulation through a glass-making experience. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(1), 4-11.

LaJevic, L. (2013). Arts Integration: What Is Really Happening in the Elementary Classroom?. Journal for Learning through the Arts, 9(1), 1-28.

Lestari, T. P., Sarwi, S., & Sumarti, S. S. (2018). STEM-based Project Based Learning model to increase science process and creative thinking skills of 5th grade. Journal of primary education, 7(1), 18-24.

Liao, C. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education, 69(6), 44-49.

Marshall, J. (2014). Transdisciplinarity and art integration: Toward a new understanding of art-based learning across the curriculum. Studies in Art Education, 55(2), 104-127.

Martin, A. J., Mansour, M., Anderson, M., Gibson, R., Liem, G. A., & Sudmalis, D. (2013). The role of arts participation in students’ academic and nonacademic outcomes: A longitudinal study of school, home, and community factors. Journal of Educational psychology, 105(3), 709.

Muskania, R. T., & Wilujeng, I. (2017). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Project-Based Learning Untuk Membekali Foundational Knowledge Dan Meningkatkan Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(1), 34-43.

National Art Education Association [NAEA]. (2016). Using art education to build a stronger workforce.

Payton, F., White, A., & Mullins, T. (2017). STEM majors, art thinkers–issues of duality, rigor and inclusion. Journal of STEM Education, 18(3).

Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). What Does Creativity Look Like in the STEAM Classroom?. Circe magazine: steam edition, 66.

Permanasari, A., Rubini, B., & Nugroho, O. F. (2021). STEM Education in Indonesia: Science Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 2(1), 7-16.

Plucker, J. A., Guo, J., & Dilley, A. (2018). Guided programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. In APA handbook of giftedness and talent. (pp. 387-397). American Psychological Association.

Purnamasari, I., Khasanah, I., & Wahyuni, S. (2020, February). Digital literacy for children based on steam in family education. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1464, No. 1, p. 012032). IOP Publishing.

Putra, T. T. (2012). Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dengan pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1).

Putra, S. R. (2013). Desain belajar mengajar kreatif berbasis sains.

Quigley, C., Herro, D., & Jamil, F. (2017). Developing a STEAM classroomassessment of learning experiences. School Science & Mathematics, 117(1-2), 1-12.

Rabkin, N., & Hedberg, E. C. (2011). Arts Education in America: What the Declines Mean for Arts Participation. Based on the 2008 Survey of Public Participation in the Arts. Research Report# 52. National Endowment for the Arts.

Rahmawati, A., & Purnomo, E. A. (2017). Penerapan PjBL untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif pada Workshop Pendidikan Matematika. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Internasional.

Rahmawati, Y., Agustin, M. A., Ridwan, A., Erdawati, E., Darwis, D., & Rafiuddin, R. (2019, December). The development of chemistry students’ 21 century skills through a STEAM project on electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1402, No. 5, p. 055049). IOP Publishing.

Root-Bernstein, R. (2015). Arts and crafts as adjuncts to STEM education to foster creativity in gifted and talented students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 203-212.

Rosidi, I., Ibrahim, M., & Tjandrakirana, T. (2013). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Menggunakan Perangkat Pembelajaran Biologi Dengan Pendekatan TASC (Thinking Actively In Social Context). JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 2(2), 250-257.

Sani, R. A. (2016). Penilaian autentik. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Swaminathan, S., & Schellenberg, E. G. (2015). Arts education, academic achievement and cognitive ability. In P. P. Tinio, & J. K. Smith (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts (pp. 364–384). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, P. C. (2016). Why is a STEAM curriculum perspective crucial to the 21st century?.

Thuneberg, H., Salmi, H., & Fenyvesi, K. (2017). Hands-on math and art exhibition promoting science attitudes and educational plans. Education Research International, 2017.

Wilson, B., & Hawkins, B. (2019). Art and science in a transdisciplinary curriculum. CIRCE MAGAZINE: STEAM EDITION, 27.

Yamin, M., Saputra, A., & Deswila, N. (2021). Enhancing Critical Thinking in Analyzing Short Story “The Lazy Jack†Viewed from Identity Theory. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 3(1), 30-39.

Zubaidah, S. (2020). Self Regulated Learning: Pembelajaran dan Tantangan pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Prosiding SNPBS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi dan Saintek) Ke-5.


  • There are currently no refbacks.