PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN SCIENCE BERORIENTASI CULTURAL DEVIANCE SOLUTION BERBASIS INKUIRI MENGGUNAKAN ICT UNTUK MENGEMBANGKAN KARAKTER PESERTA DIDIK

I. Akhlis, N. R. Dewi

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini ialah menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran yang mampu berperan serta dalam memberikan solusi terhadap salah satu isu global yaitu cultural deviance melalui penumbuhkembangan kembali nilai ideologi pancasila pada peserta didik. Hasil validasi diperoleh hasil bahwa perangkat sudah layak digunakan meskipun ada perbaikan namun bukan mencangkup konsep. Pada kegiatan simulasi RPP, seluruh rencana kegiatan terlaksana dengan baik. Hasil uji keterbacaan dan validasi instrumen tes menunjukan ada beberapa kata yang perlu direvisi dan dari 8 soal yang direncanakan hanya 5 soal yang teruji valid. Perangkat pembelajaran science berorientasi cultural deviation solution  berbasis inkuiri menggunakan ICT untuk mengembangkan karakter peserta didik memberikan peluang yang besar untuk menumbuh kembangkan nilai tersebut.

 


The purpose of this study is to produce a device capable of learning to participate in finding solutions to one global issue that is cultural deviance through return values of Pancasila ideology on the learner. Results obtained results validate that the device is suitable to be used even though there is improvement but instead covers the concept. In the simulation activity lesson plans, all plans come to fruition activities. Readability test results and instrument validation tests show there are some words that need to be revised and planned from 8 questions only about 5 proven valid. Device-oriented science teaching inquiry-based cultural deviation solution using ICT to develop the character of students presents a great opportunity to cultivate these values.

Keywords

learning devices; cultural deviance solution

Full Text:

PDF

References

Assegaf, A. R. 2003. Kondisi dan Pemicu Kekerasan dalam Pendidikan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Tinggi Agama Islam, 2(1). http://www.ditpertais.net/istiqro/ist02-03.asp [16/02/2010].

Bahbahani, K. 2006. Inside Look: An Interior Portrait of Constructivist Teachers. The Construktivist, 17 (1), Kelowna: British Columbia http://www.odu.edu/educ/act/ journal/vol 17no1/bahbahani.pdf [21/10/2009].

Brooks, J.G. & Brooks, M.G. 1999. In search of understanding: The Case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. http://asimov.coehs.uwosh.edu/~cramer/casestudy1/Concepts/Constructivist.html [27/01/2010].

BSNP. 2017. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 41 tahun 2007 tentang Standar Proses untuk satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Clark, C., Guskey, T., & Benninga, J. 1983. The effectiveness of mastery learning strategies in undergraduate education courses. Journal of Educational Research, 76(4): 210-214.

Direktorat Jendral Perguruan Tinggi. 2007. Pelatihan Metodologi PPKP dan PIPS: Metodologi Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan. Tersedia di http://www.ditnaga-dikti.org/ditnaga/files/PPKP-PIPS/metode_PPKP.pdf [diakses pada 01/11/2009].

Halat, E. 2006. Sex-Related Differences In The Acquisition Of The Van Hiele Levels And Motivation In Learning Geometry. Asia Pacific Education Review Copyright 2006 by Education Research Institute. 7(2): 173-183.

Hidayat, M. A. 2004. Bahan Penelitian Matematika ” Teori-teori Belajar Matematika”. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Kaino, L M. 2008. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) developments, utilization and challenges in ICMI history. www.unige.ch/math/EnsMath/Rome2008/WG4/Papers/KAINO.pdf [31/10/2009].

Thiagarajan, S. 1974. Instructional Development for Teacher of Exceptional Children. Bloomington: Indiana University. www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno... [30/10/2009].

Tinio, V. L. ICT in Education. www.apdip.net/publications/iespprimers/eprimer-edu.pdf [31/10/2009].

Yore, L. D. 2001. What is Meant by Constructivist Science Teaching and

Will the Science Education Community Stay the Course for Meaningful Reform?. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 5 (4). www.unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/yore.html [30/10/2009].

Yager, R. 1991. The constructivist learning model towards real reform in science education. The Science Teacher, 58 (6): 52-57.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.