The Effect of Scaffolding of Information Literacy on the Botanical Literacy of Prospective Biology Teachers

M. S. Sari, S. Sunarmi, K. Mawaddah

Abstract

The present study aims to determine the effect of the scaffolding of information literacy on the botanical literacy of prospective biology teachers. The current study employed an experimental method with a non-equivalent group design. The respondents comprised 120 students in the Biology Education Program of Malang State University (the academic year 2017/2018), divided into the control and experimental groups. Data collection was based on scaffolding information literacy among prospective biology teachers and subsequent botanical literacy tests in multiple-choice format. The botanical literacy test provides nine indicator references. Reliability testing was done using Cronbach's alpha. Data were analyzed through pre-test covariate analysis (p < 0.05) for the control and experimental groups. The present study indicates that the scaffolding of information literacy has a significant effect on botanical literacy among prospective biology teachers. The findings of the current study suggest that innovation in botany learning, in this case, the scaffolding information literacy, can improve the botanical literacy of biology education students. It is necessary to undertake learning innovation with biology education students in a professional manner to enable them to transfer knowledge using scaffolding information literacy to their prospective students. In conclusion, the scaffolding of information literacy has a significant effect on botanical literacy among prospective biology teachers.

Keywords

botanical literacy; prospective; teachers; scaffolding information literacy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aldabbus, S. (2018). Project-based learning: implementation & challenges. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 6(3), 71-79.

Alghail, A. B. A, & Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2016). Academic reading difficulties encountered by international graduate students in a Malaysian university. Issues in Educational Research, 26(3), 369-386.

Boholm, Å., Larsson, S. (2019). What is the problem? A literature review on challenges facing the communication of nanotechnology to the public. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 21, 86.

Bhimani, N. (2011). Information literacy: A 21st-century graduate skill. Middlesex Journal of Educational Technology, 1(1), 44-50.

Bikmaz, F. H., Celebi, O., Ata, A., Ozer, E., Soyak, O., & Recber, H. (2010). Scaffolding strategies are applied by student teachers to teach mathematics. The International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 1, 25-36.

Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning: an integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) approach (2nd ed). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

De Champlain, A. F. (2010). A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education. Medical education, 44(1), 109-117.

Drea, S. (2011). The end of the botany degree in the UK. Bioscience Education, 17(1), 1-7.

Freeman, E., & Lynd-Balta, E. (2010). Developing information literacy skills early in an undergraduate curriculum. College Teaching, 58, 109-115.

Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): measuring undergraduates' evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377.

Hemingway, C., Dahl, W., Haufler, C., & Stuessy, C. (2011). Building botanical literacy. Science, 331(6024) 1535-1536.

Hubbard, K. E., & Dunbar, S. D. (2017). Perceptions of scientific research literature and strategies for reading papers depend on academic career stage. PloS one, 12(12), e0189753.

Lasauskiene, J., & Rauduvaite, A. (2015). Project-based learning at university: teaching experiences of lecturers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 788–792.

Leedy, P., & Ormrud, J. E. (2018). Practical Research: Planning and Design.New York City: Pearson.

Leksono, S. M., Rustaman, N., & Redjeki, S. (2013). Kemampuan profesional guru biologi dalam memahami dan merancang model pembelajaran konservasi biodiversitas di SM. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 32(3), 408-419.

Mishra, K. R. (2013). Vygotskian perspective of teaching-learning. Innovation: International Journal of Applied Research, 1(1), 21-30.

Molenaar, I., Van boxtel, C. A. M., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2011). Metacognitif scaffolding in an innovative learning arrangement. Journal Instructional Science, 39(6), 785-803.

Porter, J. R. (2005). Information literacy in biology education: an example from an advanced cell biology course. Cell Biology Education, 4(4), 335–343.

Ratheeswari, K. (2018). Information communication technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(1), 45-47.

Saglam, A. Ç., Çankaya, I., Üçer, H., & Çetin, M. (2017). The effect of information literacy on teachers' critical thinking disposition. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(3), 31-40.

Sari, M. S., Sunarmi, S., Sulasmi, S., & Eko, S. (2018) Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis proyek terhadap keterampilan literasi botani mahasiswa calon guru biologi. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 9(2), 1-11.

Saripudin, A., & Wardani, S. (2015). Characterized Project based learning to improve critical thinking skill.

Safaruddin, S., Ibrahim, N., Juhaeni, J., Harmilawati, H., & Qadrianti, L. (2020). The Effect of Project-Based Learning Assisted by Electronic Media on Learning Motivation and Science Process Skills. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(1), 22-29.

Sural, S., & Dedebali, D. (2018). A study of curriculum literacy and information literacy levels of teacher candidates in department of social sciences education. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 303–317.

Syukriah, S., Nurmaliah, C., & Abdullah, A. (2020, February). The implementation of project-based learning model to improve students’ learning outcomes. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1460, No. 1, p. 012064). IOP Publishing.

Taber, K. S. (2018). Scaffolding learning: Principles for effective teaching and the design of classroom resources. Effective teaching and learning: Perspectives, strategies and implementation, 1-43.

Tamim, S. R., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Definitions and uses: case study of teachers implementing project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 7(2), 72-101.

Uma, V. (2014). Information Literacy in the Digital Era: Best practices of IGM Library, University of Hyderabad. In National Conference on Role of Library Associations in Promoting Information Literacy in the Knowledge Society, Vijayawada.

Uno, G. E. (2009). Botanical literacy: How and what students should learn about plants. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1753–1759.

van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271–296.

Wu, C. H., Chen, Y. S., & Chen, T. G. (2017). An adaptive e-learning system for enhancing learning performance: Based on dynamic scaffolding theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(3), 903-913.

Zajkov, O., & Mitrevski, B. (2012). Project-based learning: dilemmas and questions! Macedonian Physics Teacher 48, 1-11.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.