Y. N. Pratiwi, S. Rahayu, F. Fajaroh


The aim of this research was to investigate the difference in students’ critical thinking which learnt cooperatively using different learning context. Quasy experimental postest only control group design was chosen as experimental design using two equivalent classes as the sample. The first class (15 MIA 5, n = 30) was taught using socioscientific issues (SSI) as the learning context and the second one (15 MIA 6, n = 30) was not. The research instrument was a test consisted of 16 items of multiple choice questionsdeveloped based on Ennis’ critical thinking indicators. This instrument have been validated and its reliability approved with r = 0,765. Students’ post-test scores were analyzed using t-test with SPSS 16 for Windows. The result showed that statistically students’ critical thinking skills betweentwo classes was significanly different (Asym. Sig = 0,037). Students who taught using SSI have higher score (73,96) than the one wasn’t (66,04). Result shows that using socioscientific issues (SSI) as learning context has significant effect on high school students’ critical thinking skills.


cooperative learning; socioscientific issues; critical thinking skills

Full Text:



Chang, R. & Overby, J. 2011. General Chemistry The Essential Concepts Sixth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research Fourth Edition. Boston:Pearson Education, Inc.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2009. Rencana Strategis Pendidikan Nasional 2005-2009. (Online), ( restra-depdiknas.pdf), diakses 6 April 2015.

Domènech, A. M. & Márquez, C.2013. Promoting Students’ Critical Thinking through the Design of Scientific Researches Related to a SSI: The Case of ADHD. ESERA Conference Proceding.

Eggert, S., Ostermeyer, F., Hasselhorn, M., & Bögeholz, S. 2012. Socioscientific Decision Making in the Science Classroom: The Effect of Embedded Metacognitive Instructions on Students’ Learning Outcomes. Research Article Education Research International,

Ennis, R. H. 1993. Critical Thinking Assessment. Theory into Practice, (32) 3: 179-186.

Ennis, R. H. 2011. The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. (Online), ( 000.pdf), diakses pada 6 Februari 2015.

Facione, P. A. 2013. Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. California: Measured Reasons and The California Academic Press.

Felder, R. M. & Brent, R. 2007. Cooperative Learning, Active Learning: Models from the Analytical Sciences, P.A. Mabrouk (ed), ACS Symposium Series 970 Chapter 4 halaman 34–53. Washington: American Chemical Society.

Friedman, T. 2007. The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T.,&Stanne, M. E. 2000. Cooperative Learning Methods: A meta-analysis. (Online), (, diakes 8 Februari 2015.

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2013. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 64 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (Online), ( dokumen/Permendikbud%20No%2064%20Tahun%202013.pdf), diakses 4 Februari 2015.

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2013. Salinan Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 69 Tahun 2013 tentang Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah. (Online), ( lopen/wpcontent/files/03_Permendikbud_ Nomor_69_Tahun_2013_tentang_Kerangka_Dasar_dan_Struktur_Kurikulum_SMA-MA_-_Biro_Hukor.pdf), diakses 4 Februari 3015.

Klimovienė, G., Urbonienė, J., & Barzdžiukienė, R. 2006. Developing Critical Thinking through Cooperative Learning.Studies about Languages, 9: 77-85.

Kolstø, S. D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K., Mestad, I., Quale, A., Tonning, A. S. V., & Ulvik, M. 2006. Science Students’ Critical Examination of Scientific Information Related to Socioscientific Issues. Science Education, 90 (4): 632-655.

Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. 2013. Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry as Contexts for the Learning of Science and Achievement of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3): 138-147.

Lee, H. S., Liu, O. L., Pallant, A., Roohr, K. C., Pryputniewicz, S., & Buck, Z. E. 2014. Assessment of Uncertainty-Infused Scientific Argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5): 581–605.

Mahdi, J. G. 2014. Student Attitudes towards Chemistry: an Examination of Choices and Preferences. American Journal of Educational Research, 2 (6): 351-356.

National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington: National Academy Press.

Nezami, N. R., Asgari, M., & Dinarvand, H. 2013. The Effect of Cooperative Learning On the Critical Thinking of High School Students. Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3 (19): 2508-2514.

Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. 2003. How Literacy in Its Fundamental Sense Is Central to Scientific Literacy. Science Education, 87 (2): 224-240.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2015. OECD Database. (Online). (, diakses 18 Maret 2015.

Rahayu, S. 2014.Inovasi Pembelajaran Kimia Abad 21 dan Perkembangan Riset Kimia.Menuju Masyarakat Berliterasi Sains: Harapan dan Tantangan Kurikulum 2013. Malang, 6 September 2014.

Ratcliffe, M. & Grace, M. 2003. Science Education for Citizenship: Teaching Socio-Scientific Issues. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Sadler, T. D. & Zeidler, D. L. 2004. The Morality of Socioscientific Issues: Construal and Resolution of Genetic Engineering Dilemmas. Science Education. 88 (1): 4-27.

Tal, T. & Kedmi, Y. 2006. Teaching socioscientific issues: classroom culture and students’ performances. Cultural Science Education. DOI 10.1007/s11422-006-9026-9.

Valdez, A. V., Lomoljo, A., Dumrang, S. P., & Didatar, M. M. 2015. Developing Critical Thinking through Activity –Based and Cooperative Learning Approach in TeachingHigh School Chemistry.International Journal of Social Science and Humanity.5(1) : 139-141.


  • There are currently no refbacks.