The Evaluation of Science Learning Program, Technology and Society Application of Audio Bio Harmonic System with Solar Energy to Improve Crop Productivity

D. Rosana, N. Kadarisman, A. Maryanto, A. Sugiharsono


One of the greatest challenges in science learning is how to integrate a wide range of basic scientific concepts of physics, chemistry, and biology into an integrated learning material. Research-based teaching material in this area is still very poor and does not much involve students of science education in its implementation as part of the learning program science technology and society (STS). The purpose of this study is to get the result of evaluation of the teaching and learning of STS in the form of public service in Kulon Progo, Yogyakarta. The program to improve crop productivity through the application of Audio Bio Harmonic System (ABHS) with solar energy have been selected for utilizing the natural animal sounds to open stomata of the leaves conducted during foliar fertilization, making it suitable for integrated science lessons. Component of evaluation model used is Stufflebeam model evaluation (CIPP). CIPP evaluation in these activities resulted in two aspects: The first aspect was improving the skills of students and farmers in using ABHS, and these two aspects, namely food crop productivity; (1) cayenne increased 76.4%, (2) increased red onions (56.3%) and (3) of maize increased by 67.8%. Besides, it was also the effect of the application of ABHS on the rate of plant growth. The outcome of this study is the STS teaching materials and appropriate technology of ABHS with solar energy.


evaluation; science technology and society; audio bioharmonic; crop productivity

Full Text:



Akcay, Behiye, & Akcay, Hakan. 2015. Effectiveness of Science-Technology-Society (STS) Instruction on Student Understanding of the Nature of Science and Attitudes toward Science. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 3 (1), 37-45.

Altieri, M. A. (1999). The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 74(1), 19-31.

Bakar Elif, Senol Bal, & Akcay Hakan. 2006. Preservice science teachers beliefs about science –technology And their implication in society. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2 (3), 18-32.

Butin, D. W. (2003). Of what use is it? Multiple conceptualizations of service learning within education. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1674-1692.

Daryanto, H. (2008). Evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Donald, P. F., Green, R. E., & Heath, M. F. (2001). Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268(1462), 25-29.

The driver, R., Leach, J., Miller, R., & Scott, P. 2000. Young people’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.

El-Sawy, B. I., Radawan, E. A., & Hassan, N. A. (2000). Growth and yield of potato as affected by soil and foliar potassium application. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ, 25(9), 5843-5850.

El-Tantawy, I. M., El-Ghamry, A. M., & Habib, A. H. (2009). Effect of chicken manure and manure compost tea on potato yield and soil fertility. J. Agric. Sci, 34, 659-668.

Gelmon, S. B. 2000. Challenges in assessing service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Special Issue, 84–90.

Ghozali, Imam. 2008. Model Persamaan Struktural Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan. Program Amos 16.0. Badan Penerbit UNDIP. Semarang.

Holland, B. A. (2001). A Comprehensive Model for Assessing Service‐Learning and Community‐University Partnerships. New Directions for Higher Education, 2001(114), 51-60.

Isaac, S., & Michael, W. B. (1971). Handbook in research and evaluation.

Karayan, S., & Gathercoal, P. (2005). Assessing service-learning in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(3), 79-92.

Koliba, C. J., Campbell, E. K., & Shapiro, C. (2006). The practice of service learning in local school-community contexts. Educational Policy, 20(5), 683-717.

Lawlor, D. W. (2002). Carbon and nitrogen assimilation in relation to yield: mechanisms are the key to understanding production systems. Journal of experimental Botany, 53(370), 773-787.

Lewis, T., & Dibley, G. C. (1970). Air movement near windbreaks and a hypothesis of the mechanism of the accumulation of airborne insects. Annals of Applied Biology, 66(3), 477-484.

Lewis, T., & Stephenson, J. W. (1966). The permeability of artificial windbreaks and the distribution of flying insects in the leeward sheltered zone. Annals of Applied Biology, 58(3), 355-363.

Mabry, J. B. (1998). Pedagogical Variations in Service-Learning and Student Outcomes: How Time, Contact, and Reflection Matter. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 5, 32-47.

Mickleburgh, S. P., Hutson, A. M., & Racey, P. A. (2002). A review of the global conservation status of bats. Oryx, 36(01), 18-34.

Moore, D. T. (1999). Behind the wizard’s curtain: A challenge to the true believer. NSEE Quarterly, 25(1), 1.

Nurosis, J. M. (1986). SPSS/PC+ for the imbbc/xt/at.

Connor, O. RJ & Shrubb, M. 1986. Farming and Birds.

Prabowo, S. A. (2015). The effectiveness of scientific based learning towards science process skill mastery of PGSD students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(1), 15-19.

Putra, P. D. A., & Iqbal, M. (2016). Implementation of serious games inspired by baluran national park to improve students’critical thinking ability. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 101-108.

Shangguan, Z., Shao, M., & Dyckmans, J. (2000). Effects of nitrogen nutrition and water deficit on net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence in winter wheat. Journal of Plant Physiology, 156(1), 46-51.

Sofowora, O. A., & Adekomi, B. (2012). Improving science, technology and mathematics education in Nigeria: A case study of Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 10(1), 1-8.

Steinke, P., & Buresh, S. (2002). Cognitive outcomes of service-learning: Reviewing the past and glimpsing the future. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 8(2), 5.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The use of experimental design in educational evaluation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8(4), 267-274.

Stufflebeam, D. L, Shinkfield, A. J. 1985. Systematic evalaution. U.S.A. Massachu-setts: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

Sugiyono, M. P. K. (2008). kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 124.

Verboom, B., & Spoelstra, K. (1999). Effects of food abundance and wind on the use of tree lines by an insectivorous bat, Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 77(9), 1393-1401.

Rosana, D. (2014). Pengembangan Soft Skills Mahasiswa Program Kelas Internasional melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Konteks untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Proses dan Hasil Belajar Mekanika. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1).

Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2011). Evaluasi program pendidikan.

Wijayanti, A., & Basyar, M. A. K. (2016). The development of thematic–integrated e-portfolio media web blog based to increase the scientific literacy of elementary teacher education program’s student. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2).

Wijanto, S.H. 2008. Struktural equation modeling dengan lisrel 8. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Worthen, B.R & Sanders, J.R. 1981. Educa-tional Evaluation: Theory and practice. Ohio: Charles A. Jones Publishing Company Worthington.

Yager, R. E. (1992). The STS approach parallels constructivist practices. Science Education International, 3(2), 18-20.

Yulianto, Y. (2012). Penerapan teknologi sonic bloom dan pupuk organik untuk peningkatan produksi bawang merah (Studi Kasus Bawang Merah di Brebes, Jawa Tengah). AGROLAND, 15(3).

Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-Learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57-84.

Zoller, U. (2012). Science education for global sustainability: What is necessary for teaching, learning, and assessment strategies?.


  • There are currently no refbacks.